进入医学博士项目的女性人数比以往任何时候都多。她们的未来会怎样?

IF 6.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Lawrence F Brass, Myles H Akabas
{"title":"进入医学博士项目的女性人数比以往任何时候都多。她们的未来会怎样?","authors":"Lawrence F Brass, Myles H Akabas","doi":"10.1172/jci.insight.184715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The earliest MD/PhD programs were small and enrolled mostly men. Here we show that since 2014 there has been a steady increase in the number of women in MD/PhD programs, reaching parity with men in 2023. This change was due to an increase in female applicants, a decrease in male applicants, and an increase in the acceptance rate for women, which had previously been lower than for men. Data from the National MD/PhD Program Outcomes Study show that training duration has been similar for men and women, as have most choices of medical specialties and workplaces. However, women were less likely to have full-time faculty appointments, fewer had NIH grants, and those in the most recent graduation cohort at the time of the survey reported spending less time on research than men. Previously-cited reasons for these differences include disproportionate childcare responsibilities, a paucity of role models, insufficient recognition, and gender bias. Institutions can and should address these obstacles, but training programs can help by preparing their graduates to succeed despite the systemic obstacles. The alternative is a persistent gender gap in the physician-scientist workforce, lost opportunities to benefit from diverse perspectives, and a diminished impact of valuable training resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":14722,"journal":{"name":"JCI insight","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More women than ever are entering MD-PhD programs. What lies ahead for them?\",\"authors\":\"Lawrence F Brass, Myles H Akabas\",\"doi\":\"10.1172/jci.insight.184715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The earliest MD/PhD programs were small and enrolled mostly men. Here we show that since 2014 there has been a steady increase in the number of women in MD/PhD programs, reaching parity with men in 2023. This change was due to an increase in female applicants, a decrease in male applicants, and an increase in the acceptance rate for women, which had previously been lower than for men. Data from the National MD/PhD Program Outcomes Study show that training duration has been similar for men and women, as have most choices of medical specialties and workplaces. However, women were less likely to have full-time faculty appointments, fewer had NIH grants, and those in the most recent graduation cohort at the time of the survey reported spending less time on research than men. Previously-cited reasons for these differences include disproportionate childcare responsibilities, a paucity of role models, insufficient recognition, and gender bias. Institutions can and should address these obstacles, but training programs can help by preparing their graduates to succeed despite the systemic obstacles. The alternative is a persistent gender gap in the physician-scientist workforce, lost opportunities to benefit from diverse perspectives, and a diminished impact of valuable training resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCI insight\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCI insight\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.184715\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCI insight","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.184715","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最早的医学博士/博士项目规模较小,主要招收男性。我们在此表明,自 2014 年以来,医学博士/博士项目中的女性人数稳步增长,到 2023 年达到与男性人数持平。这一变化的原因是女性申请者的增加、男性申请者的减少以及女性录取率的提高,而此前女性录取率一直低于男性。全国医学博士/博士项目成果研究》的数据显示,男性和女性的培训时间相似,对医学专业和工作场所的选择也大多相似。然而,与男性相比,女性获得全职教职的可能性较低,获得美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)基金资助的人数较少,而且在调查时,最近一批毕业的女性在研究方面花费的时间也较少。之前提到的造成这些差异的原因包括:过重的育儿责任、缺乏榜样、认可度不够以及性别偏见。教育机构可以也应该解决这些障碍,但培训项目也可以帮助毕业生克服系统性障碍,取得成功。否则,医生-科学家队伍中的性别差距就会持续存在,失去从多元化视角中获益的机会,宝贵的培训资源的作用也会减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
More women than ever are entering MD-PhD programs. What lies ahead for them?

The earliest MD/PhD programs were small and enrolled mostly men. Here we show that since 2014 there has been a steady increase in the number of women in MD/PhD programs, reaching parity with men in 2023. This change was due to an increase in female applicants, a decrease in male applicants, and an increase in the acceptance rate for women, which had previously been lower than for men. Data from the National MD/PhD Program Outcomes Study show that training duration has been similar for men and women, as have most choices of medical specialties and workplaces. However, women were less likely to have full-time faculty appointments, fewer had NIH grants, and those in the most recent graduation cohort at the time of the survey reported spending less time on research than men. Previously-cited reasons for these differences include disproportionate childcare responsibilities, a paucity of role models, insufficient recognition, and gender bias. Institutions can and should address these obstacles, but training programs can help by preparing their graduates to succeed despite the systemic obstacles. The alternative is a persistent gender gap in the physician-scientist workforce, lost opportunities to benefit from diverse perspectives, and a diminished impact of valuable training resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JCI insight
JCI insight Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
1.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: JCI Insight is a Gold Open Access journal with a 2022 Impact Factor of 8.0. It publishes high-quality studies in various biomedical specialties, such as autoimmunity, gastroenterology, immunology, metabolism, nephrology, neuroscience, oncology, pulmonology, and vascular biology. The journal focuses on clinically relevant basic and translational research that contributes to the understanding of disease biology and treatment. JCI Insight is self-published by the American Society for Clinical Investigation (ASCI), a nonprofit honor organization of physician-scientists founded in 1908, and it helps fulfill the ASCI's mission to advance medical science through the publication of clinically relevant research reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信