Dong Kee Jang, Young Suk Park, Moon-Won Yoo, Sun-Hwi Hwang, Seong-Yeob Ryu, Oh Kyoung Kwon, Hoon Hur, Hong Man Yoon, Bang Wool Eom, Hye Seong Ahn, Taeil Son, Kyo Young Song, Han Hong Lee, Min-Gew Choi, Ji Yeong An, Sang-Il Lee, Sang Hyub Lee, Do Joong Park
{"title":"熊去氧胆酸治疗胃癌远端胃切除术后胆汁反流的疗效:PEGASUS-D 随机临床试验的二次分析。","authors":"Dong Kee Jang, Young Suk Park, Moon-Won Yoo, Sun-Hwi Hwang, Seong-Yeob Ryu, Oh Kyoung Kwon, Hoon Hur, Hong Man Yoon, Bang Wool Eom, Hye Seong Ahn, Taeil Son, Kyo Young Song, Han Hong Lee, Min-Gew Choi, Ji Yeong An, Sang-Il Lee, Sang Hyub Lee, Do Joong Park","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have been conducted on the prevention of bile reflux in gastric cancer patients who have undergone gastrectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in preventing bile reflux after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a secondary analysis of the PEGASUS-D trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Adults with a diagnosis of gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy were enrolled. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive 300 mg of UDCA, 600 mg of UDCA, or placebo at a ratio of 1:1:1. UDCA and placebo were administered daily for 52 weeks. The primary outcomes included bile reflux symptoms at each time point, percentage of participants with bile reflux, and the grade of gastritis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 521 participants who underwent randomization, 151, 164, and 150 participants were analyzed from the 300 mg UDCA, 600 mg UDCA, and placebo groups, respectively. The difference in symptoms between the three groups was not significant. Bile reflux was less evident in the UDCA group than in the placebo group; however, this difference was significant only in the 300-mg group at 12 months post-operation (odds ratio, 0.44; P = 0.0076). A significant reduction in gastritis was also observed in the 300-mg group at 12 months post-operation (odds ratio, 0.50; P = 0.0368) compared to the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that UDCA administration significantly reduced bile reflux and gastritis by approximately 50% at the 12 months-postoperative follow-up in patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid for bile reflux after distal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: A secondary analysis of the PEGASUS-D randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Dong Kee Jang, Young Suk Park, Moon-Won Yoo, Sun-Hwi Hwang, Seong-Yeob Ryu, Oh Kyoung Kwon, Hoon Hur, Hong Man Yoon, Bang Wool Eom, Hye Seong Ahn, Taeil Son, Kyo Young Song, Han Hong Lee, Min-Gew Choi, Ji Yeong An, Sang-Il Lee, Sang Hyub Lee, Do Joong Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have been conducted on the prevention of bile reflux in gastric cancer patients who have undergone gastrectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in preventing bile reflux after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a secondary analysis of the PEGASUS-D trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Adults with a diagnosis of gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy were enrolled. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive 300 mg of UDCA, 600 mg of UDCA, or placebo at a ratio of 1:1:1. UDCA and placebo were administered daily for 52 weeks. The primary outcomes included bile reflux symptoms at each time point, percentage of participants with bile reflux, and the grade of gastritis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 521 participants who underwent randomization, 151, 164, and 150 participants were analyzed from the 300 mg UDCA, 600 mg UDCA, and placebo groups, respectively. The difference in symptoms between the three groups was not significant. Bile reflux was less evident in the UDCA group than in the placebo group; however, this difference was significant only in the 300-mg group at 12 months post-operation (odds ratio, 0.44; P = 0.0076). A significant reduction in gastritis was also observed in the 300-mg group at 12 months post-operation (odds ratio, 0.50; P = 0.0368) compared to the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that UDCA administration significantly reduced bile reflux and gastritis by approximately 50% at the 12 months-postoperative follow-up in patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002127\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid for bile reflux after distal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: A secondary analysis of the PEGASUS-D randomized clinical trial.
Background: Few studies have been conducted on the prevention of bile reflux in gastric cancer patients who have undergone gastrectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in preventing bile reflux after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer.
Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of the PEGASUS-D trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Adults with a diagnosis of gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy were enrolled. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive 300 mg of UDCA, 600 mg of UDCA, or placebo at a ratio of 1:1:1. UDCA and placebo were administered daily for 52 weeks. The primary outcomes included bile reflux symptoms at each time point, percentage of participants with bile reflux, and the grade of gastritis.
Results: Among 521 participants who underwent randomization, 151, 164, and 150 participants were analyzed from the 300 mg UDCA, 600 mg UDCA, and placebo groups, respectively. The difference in symptoms between the three groups was not significant. Bile reflux was less evident in the UDCA group than in the placebo group; however, this difference was significant only in the 300-mg group at 12 months post-operation (odds ratio, 0.44; P = 0.0076). A significant reduction in gastritis was also observed in the 300-mg group at 12 months post-operation (odds ratio, 0.50; P = 0.0368) compared to the placebo group.
Conclusions: This study showed that UDCA administration significantly reduced bile reflux and gastritis by approximately 50% at the 12 months-postoperative follow-up in patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.