文化与 ICD-11 人格障碍:对不同种族群体临床实践的影响。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Luis Hualparuca-Olivera, Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Julio Torales, Cristian Ramos-Vera, Dayana Ramos-Campos, Luis Córdova-Gónzales, Elsa Vigo-Ayasta
{"title":"文化与 ICD-11 人格障碍:对不同种族群体临床实践的影响。","authors":"Luis Hualparuca-Olivera, Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Julio Torales, Cristian Ramos-Vera, Dayana Ramos-Campos, Luis Córdova-Gónzales, Elsa Vigo-Ayasta","doi":"10.1177/00207640241288205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Personality disorder (PD) in ICD-11 is defined primarily by self and interpersonal dysfunction and optionally by other qualifiers. This definition is inseparable from relativism of cultural determinants.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This review aimed to synthesize the relevant aspects of the influence of culture on clinical practice and health management for this condition, aligning them to the ICD-11 PD model.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In Scopus, we systematically searched for studies that included the text strings: cultur* | personality AND (disorder* OR patholog*) without any restrictions on publication date or language or other exclusion criteria, up to November 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evidence suggests that cultural variables in ethnic groups (Western and non-Western) such as the individualist/collectivist philosophy, historical/generational trauma, immigration, acculturation, religion, and gender influence the etiology, semiology, epidemiology, evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, and management of health services for ICD-11 PD. We discuss the limitations and propose future lines of research on this topic based on our knowledge and experience. In this review, we provide the scientific community and clinicians with relevant cultural information to guide their practice and propose strategies to manage PD from the ICD-11 model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More research is needed using mixed study methodologies on stigma, the experiences of patients, clinicians, and health agencies, to reduce the care gaps and achieve a culturally comprehensive, inclusive, and competent use of this new model.</p>","PeriodicalId":14304,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"207640241288205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Culture and ICD-11 personality disorder: Implications for clinical practice across diverse ethnic groups.\",\"authors\":\"Luis Hualparuca-Olivera, Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Julio Torales, Cristian Ramos-Vera, Dayana Ramos-Campos, Luis Córdova-Gónzales, Elsa Vigo-Ayasta\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00207640241288205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Personality disorder (PD) in ICD-11 is defined primarily by self and interpersonal dysfunction and optionally by other qualifiers. This definition is inseparable from relativism of cultural determinants.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This review aimed to synthesize the relevant aspects of the influence of culture on clinical practice and health management for this condition, aligning them to the ICD-11 PD model.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In Scopus, we systematically searched for studies that included the text strings: cultur* | personality AND (disorder* OR patholog*) without any restrictions on publication date or language or other exclusion criteria, up to November 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evidence suggests that cultural variables in ethnic groups (Western and non-Western) such as the individualist/collectivist philosophy, historical/generational trauma, immigration, acculturation, religion, and gender influence the etiology, semiology, epidemiology, evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, and management of health services for ICD-11 PD. We discuss the limitations and propose future lines of research on this topic based on our knowledge and experience. In this review, we provide the scientific community and clinicians with relevant cultural information to guide their practice and propose strategies to manage PD from the ICD-11 model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More research is needed using mixed study methodologies on stigma, the experiences of patients, clinicians, and health agencies, to reduce the care gaps and achieve a culturally comprehensive, inclusive, and competent use of this new model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"207640241288205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640241288205\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640241288205","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在ICD-11中,人格障碍(PD)的定义主要是自我和人际交往功能障碍,也可选择其他限定词。该定义与文化决定因素的相对性密不可分。目的:本综述旨在综合文化对临床实践和健康管理的影响的相关方面,并将其与 ICD-11 PD 模型相统一:在Scopus中,我们系统地搜索了截至2022年11月包含以下文本字符串的研究:Cultur* | personality AND (disorder* OR patholog*),没有任何出版日期、语言或其他排除标准的限制:有证据表明,种族群体(西方和非西方)中的文化变量,如个人主义/集体主义哲学、历史/世代创伤、移民、文化适应、宗教和性别等,会影响 ICD-11 PD 的病因学、符号学、流行病学、评估、诊断、治疗和医疗服务管理。我们根据自己的知识和经验讨论了这一课题的局限性,并提出了未来的研究方向。在这篇综述中,我们为科学界和临床医生提供了相关的文化信息,以指导他们的实践,并提出了从 ICD-11 模式管理 PD 的策略:需要使用混合研究方法对耻辱感、患者、临床医生和医疗机构的经验进行更多研究,以减少护理差距,实现文化上全面、包容和胜任地使用这一新模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Culture and ICD-11 personality disorder: Implications for clinical practice across diverse ethnic groups.

Background: Personality disorder (PD) in ICD-11 is defined primarily by self and interpersonal dysfunction and optionally by other qualifiers. This definition is inseparable from relativism of cultural determinants.

Aims: This review aimed to synthesize the relevant aspects of the influence of culture on clinical practice and health management for this condition, aligning them to the ICD-11 PD model.

Method: In Scopus, we systematically searched for studies that included the text strings: cultur* | personality AND (disorder* OR patholog*) without any restrictions on publication date or language or other exclusion criteria, up to November 2022.

Results: Evidence suggests that cultural variables in ethnic groups (Western and non-Western) such as the individualist/collectivist philosophy, historical/generational trauma, immigration, acculturation, religion, and gender influence the etiology, semiology, epidemiology, evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, and management of health services for ICD-11 PD. We discuss the limitations and propose future lines of research on this topic based on our knowledge and experience. In this review, we provide the scientific community and clinicians with relevant cultural information to guide their practice and propose strategies to manage PD from the ICD-11 model.

Conclusions: More research is needed using mixed study methodologies on stigma, the experiences of patients, clinicians, and health agencies, to reduce the care gaps and achieve a culturally comprehensive, inclusive, and competent use of this new model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
1.30%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, established in 1954, is a leading publication dedicated to the field of social psychiatry. It serves as a platform for the exchange of research findings and discussions on the influence of social, environmental, and cultural factors on mental health and well-being. The journal is particularly relevant to psychiatrists and multidisciplinary professionals globally who are interested in understanding the broader context of psychiatric disorders and their impact on individuals and communities. Social psychiatry, as a discipline, focuses on the origins and outcomes of mental health issues within a social framework, recognizing the interplay between societal structures and individual mental health. The journal draws connections with related fields such as social anthropology, cultural psychiatry, and sociology, and is influenced by the latest developments in these areas. The journal also places a special emphasis on fast-track publication for brief communications, ensuring that timely and significant research can be disseminated quickly. Additionally, it strives to reflect its international readership by publishing state-of-the-art reviews from various regions around the world, showcasing the diverse practices and perspectives within the psychiatric disciplines. This approach not only contributes to the scientific understanding of social psychiatry but also supports the global exchange of knowledge and best practices in mental health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信