{"title":"巴贝西亚原虫病:英国感染证据分析》。","authors":"Michael J Cook, Basant K Puri","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S485759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human babesiosis is caused when erythrocytes are invaded by <i>Babesia</i>. Infection can occur from the bite of an infected tick, blood transfusion or congenitally. Issues related to the infecting species, symptomology and testing technology are discussed and the implications of accurate incidence and prevalence of the disease discussed. Human babesiosis is considered to be relatively rare in the UK. With a considerable number of non-specific symptoms and diagnostic testing limitations, it is probable that true positives are being missed. Based on co-infection data for <i>Borrelia</i> and <i>Babesia</i> from Rhode Island and Connecticut, and on <i>Borrelia</i> seropositivity data from northeastern France, the prevalence of babesiosis in those aged under 35 years, 35 to 44 years, 45 to 54 years and 55 years and over would be expected to be 0.6%, 1.8%, 2.8% and 3.5%, respectively. Based on the prevalence of infections in ticks and canines and a disease model previously published, it is estimated that the UK incidence of human babesiosis is likely to be approximately 18,500 cases per year.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11488525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Babesiosis: Analysis of the Evidence for Infections in the United Kingdom.\",\"authors\":\"Michael J Cook, Basant K Puri\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IJGM.S485759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Human babesiosis is caused when erythrocytes are invaded by <i>Babesia</i>. Infection can occur from the bite of an infected tick, blood transfusion or congenitally. Issues related to the infecting species, symptomology and testing technology are discussed and the implications of accurate incidence and prevalence of the disease discussed. Human babesiosis is considered to be relatively rare in the UK. With a considerable number of non-specific symptoms and diagnostic testing limitations, it is probable that true positives are being missed. Based on co-infection data for <i>Borrelia</i> and <i>Babesia</i> from Rhode Island and Connecticut, and on <i>Borrelia</i> seropositivity data from northeastern France, the prevalence of babesiosis in those aged under 35 years, 35 to 44 years, 45 to 54 years and 55 years and over would be expected to be 0.6%, 1.8%, 2.8% and 3.5%, respectively. Based on the prevalence of infections in ticks and canines and a disease model previously published, it is estimated that the UK incidence of human babesiosis is likely to be approximately 18,500 cases per year.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11488525/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S485759\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S485759","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Babesiosis: Analysis of the Evidence for Infections in the United Kingdom.
Human babesiosis is caused when erythrocytes are invaded by Babesia. Infection can occur from the bite of an infected tick, blood transfusion or congenitally. Issues related to the infecting species, symptomology and testing technology are discussed and the implications of accurate incidence and prevalence of the disease discussed. Human babesiosis is considered to be relatively rare in the UK. With a considerable number of non-specific symptoms and diagnostic testing limitations, it is probable that true positives are being missed. Based on co-infection data for Borrelia and Babesia from Rhode Island and Connecticut, and on Borrelia seropositivity data from northeastern France, the prevalence of babesiosis in those aged under 35 years, 35 to 44 years, 45 to 54 years and 55 years and over would be expected to be 0.6%, 1.8%, 2.8% and 3.5%, respectively. Based on the prevalence of infections in ticks and canines and a disease model previously published, it is estimated that the UK incidence of human babesiosis is likely to be approximately 18,500 cases per year.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas.
A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal.
As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.