百日咳疫苗研究的文献计量分析和知识图谱:1994 年至 2023 年的趋势。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Caixia Tan, Yuanyuan Xiao, Siyao Chen, Ting Liu, Juan Zhou, Sisi Zhang, Yiran Hu, Jingxiang Zhou, Zhongyan She, Biyue Tian, Anhua Wu, Chunhui Li
{"title":"百日咳疫苗研究的文献计量分析和知识图谱:1994 年至 2023 年的趋势。","authors":"Caixia Tan, Yuanyuan Xiao, Siyao Chen, Ting Liu, Juan Zhou, Sisi Zhang, Yiran Hu, Jingxiang Zhou, Zhongyan She, Biyue Tian, Anhua Wu, Chunhui Li","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02414-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to use bibliometric methods to explore the evolving landscape, hotspots, and emerging frontiers of pertussis vaccine research, providing deeper insights into the current research landscape and guiding future vaccine development efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of the Web of Science Core Collection database (WoSCC) from January 1, 1994, to December 31, 2023, employing search terms related to vaccination (vacc* or immun*) and pertussis (pertussis, Whooping Cough, Bordetella pertussis, B. pertussis, Bordetella pertussis infection, or B. pertussis infection) in the Title or Author keywords fields. Bibliometrics analysis of pertussis research was performed utilizing the bibliometrix-biblioshiny package in RStudio, alongside CiteSpace and VOSviewer software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2,623 records were analyzed, comprising 89.63% (n = 2,351) original research articles and 10.37% (n = 272) review articles. The study revealed that academic research on the pertussis vaccine was growing at a rate of 4.64% per year. The United States and Canada lead in the number of publications. GlaxoSmithKline and the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention- United States emerged as leading institutions, with Halperin SA and Locht C as the most active authors. Vaccine was the most influential journal. Most studies focused on vaccine effectiveness duration, vaccination schedules for high-risk groups, and people's attitudes toward vaccination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis showed increasing interest of researchers in pertussis literature, yet current research mainly emphasized expanding vaccine coverage and optimizing strategies, neglecting new vaccine development. This emphasized the need for prioritizing novel pertussis vaccines to tackle the resurgence challenge.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bibliometrics analysis and knowledge mapping of pertussis vaccine research: trends from 1994 to 2023.\",\"authors\":\"Caixia Tan, Yuanyuan Xiao, Siyao Chen, Ting Liu, Juan Zhou, Sisi Zhang, Yiran Hu, Jingxiang Zhou, Zhongyan She, Biyue Tian, Anhua Wu, Chunhui Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s15010-024-02414-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to use bibliometric methods to explore the evolving landscape, hotspots, and emerging frontiers of pertussis vaccine research, providing deeper insights into the current research landscape and guiding future vaccine development efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of the Web of Science Core Collection database (WoSCC) from January 1, 1994, to December 31, 2023, employing search terms related to vaccination (vacc* or immun*) and pertussis (pertussis, Whooping Cough, Bordetella pertussis, B. pertussis, Bordetella pertussis infection, or B. pertussis infection) in the Title or Author keywords fields. Bibliometrics analysis of pertussis research was performed utilizing the bibliometrix-biblioshiny package in RStudio, alongside CiteSpace and VOSviewer software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2,623 records were analyzed, comprising 89.63% (n = 2,351) original research articles and 10.37% (n = 272) review articles. The study revealed that academic research on the pertussis vaccine was growing at a rate of 4.64% per year. The United States and Canada lead in the number of publications. GlaxoSmithKline and the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention- United States emerged as leading institutions, with Halperin SA and Locht C as the most active authors. Vaccine was the most influential journal. Most studies focused on vaccine effectiveness duration, vaccination schedules for high-risk groups, and people's attitudes toward vaccination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis showed increasing interest of researchers in pertussis literature, yet current research mainly emphasized expanding vaccine coverage and optimizing strategies, neglecting new vaccine development. This emphasized the need for prioritizing novel pertussis vaccines to tackle the resurgence challenge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-024-02414-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-024-02414-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在利用文献计量学方法探索百日咳疫苗研究的发展态势、热点和新兴前沿,从而深入了解当前的研究态势并指导未来的疫苗研发工作:我们对 1994 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日期间的 Web of Science Core Collection 数据库 (WoSCC) 进行了全面检索,在标题或作者关键词字段中使用了与疫苗接种(疫苗*或免疫*)和百日咳(百日咳、百日咳、百日咳博德特氏菌、百日咳杆菌、百日咳博德特氏菌感染或百日咳杆菌感染)相关的检索词。利用 RStudio 中的 bibliometrix-biblioshiny 软件包以及 CiteSpace 和 VOSviewer 软件对百日咳研究进行了文献计量学分析:共分析了 2,623 条记录,其中 89.63%(n = 2,351 篇)为原创研究文章,10.37%(n = 272 篇)为综述文章。研究显示,有关百日咳疫苗的学术研究以每年 4.64% 的速度增长。美国和加拿大的论文数量居首位。葛兰素史克公司和美国疾病控制与预防中心成为领先机构,Halperin SA 和 Locht C 是最活跃的作者。疫苗》是最有影响力的期刊。大多数研究集中在疫苗有效期、高风险人群的疫苗接种计划以及人们对疫苗接种的态度等方面:我们的分析表明,研究人员对百日咳文献的兴趣与日俱增,但目前的研究主要强调扩大疫苗覆盖面和优化策略,而忽视了新疫苗的开发。这强调了优先开发新型百日咳疫苗以应对百日咳复发挑战的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bibliometrics analysis and knowledge mapping of pertussis vaccine research: trends from 1994 to 2023.

Purpose: This study aims to use bibliometric methods to explore the evolving landscape, hotspots, and emerging frontiers of pertussis vaccine research, providing deeper insights into the current research landscape and guiding future vaccine development efforts.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of the Web of Science Core Collection database (WoSCC) from January 1, 1994, to December 31, 2023, employing search terms related to vaccination (vacc* or immun*) and pertussis (pertussis, Whooping Cough, Bordetella pertussis, B. pertussis, Bordetella pertussis infection, or B. pertussis infection) in the Title or Author keywords fields. Bibliometrics analysis of pertussis research was performed utilizing the bibliometrix-biblioshiny package in RStudio, alongside CiteSpace and VOSviewer software.

Results: In total, 2,623 records were analyzed, comprising 89.63% (n = 2,351) original research articles and 10.37% (n = 272) review articles. The study revealed that academic research on the pertussis vaccine was growing at a rate of 4.64% per year. The United States and Canada lead in the number of publications. GlaxoSmithKline and the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention- United States emerged as leading institutions, with Halperin SA and Locht C as the most active authors. Vaccine was the most influential journal. Most studies focused on vaccine effectiveness duration, vaccination schedules for high-risk groups, and people's attitudes toward vaccination.

Conclusion: Our analysis showed increasing interest of researchers in pertussis literature, yet current research mainly emphasized expanding vaccine coverage and optimizing strategies, neglecting new vaccine development. This emphasized the need for prioritizing novel pertussis vaccines to tackle the resurgence challenge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infection
Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
224
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases. Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease. Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases. Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases. Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies. Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections. In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信