印度胃肠病学家和胃肠病学研究员对幽门螺杆菌感染管理的实践模式以及国家和国际指南遵守情况的调查。

IF 2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Vaneet Jearth, Ashutosh Ishan Yadav, Jimil Shah, Anupam Kumar Singh, Sridhar Sundaram, Vishal Sharma, Usha Dutta, Govind Makharia, Manas Kumar Panigrahi
{"title":"印度胃肠病学家和胃肠病学研究员对幽门螺杆菌感染管理的实践模式以及国家和国际指南遵守情况的调查。","authors":"Vaneet Jearth, Ashutosh Ishan Yadav, Jimil Shah, Anupam Kumar Singh, Sridhar Sundaram, Vishal Sharma, Usha Dutta, Govind Makharia, Manas Kumar Panigrahi","doi":"10.1007/s12664-024-01694-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients and primary care providers alike benefit greatly from the expertise of gastroenterologists when it comes to managing Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. However, information on gastroenterologists' practices in the management of H. pylori infection is scarce in this part of the world. This study aimed at evaluating the practice patterns of gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows in India.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey of gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows working in India.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 207 gastroenterologists and 53 fellows filled out the questionnaire. Responses were received from all around India. Approximately 70% of respondents perceive H. pylori to be a gastric pathogen, while 20% regard it as a commensal bacterium. While the proportion of respondents who chose a test and treat method (34.6%) for uninvestigated dyspepsia without alarm symptoms was comparable to empirical proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy (38.8%), about one-fifth chose a scope and treat strategy in this setting. Even in the absence of alarm signs, more than half of respondents (61.5%) preferred endoscopic biopsy to detect H. pylori. While rapid urease testing (RUT) was the preferred modality (80%) for detecting H. pylori, about one-third preferred single-site RUT (from the antrum). Only 40% followed the Updated Sydney protocol, while performing biopsies and a majority (78.8%) are unable to discontinue PPIs before testing for H. pylori. PPI-clarithromycin-based triple treatment was the preferred regimen (67%) for first-line eradication, while nearly a quarter of respondents did not utilize bismuth due to concerns about adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survey reveals a lack of adherence to the current H. pylori guidelines for diagnosis, testing and treatment among gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows in India. It is vital that scientific societies simplify guidelines, investigate challenges to their effective implementation and execute targeted interventions to increase adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":13404,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of practice patterns and adherence to national and international guidelines on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection among gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows in India.\",\"authors\":\"Vaneet Jearth, Ashutosh Ishan Yadav, Jimil Shah, Anupam Kumar Singh, Sridhar Sundaram, Vishal Sharma, Usha Dutta, Govind Makharia, Manas Kumar Panigrahi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12664-024-01694-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients and primary care providers alike benefit greatly from the expertise of gastroenterologists when it comes to managing Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. However, information on gastroenterologists' practices in the management of H. pylori infection is scarce in this part of the world. This study aimed at evaluating the practice patterns of gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows in India.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey of gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows working in India.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 207 gastroenterologists and 53 fellows filled out the questionnaire. Responses were received from all around India. Approximately 70% of respondents perceive H. pylori to be a gastric pathogen, while 20% regard it as a commensal bacterium. While the proportion of respondents who chose a test and treat method (34.6%) for uninvestigated dyspepsia without alarm symptoms was comparable to empirical proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy (38.8%), about one-fifth chose a scope and treat strategy in this setting. Even in the absence of alarm signs, more than half of respondents (61.5%) preferred endoscopic biopsy to detect H. pylori. While rapid urease testing (RUT) was the preferred modality (80%) for detecting H. pylori, about one-third preferred single-site RUT (from the antrum). Only 40% followed the Updated Sydney protocol, while performing biopsies and a majority (78.8%) are unable to discontinue PPIs before testing for H. pylori. PPI-clarithromycin-based triple treatment was the preferred regimen (67%) for first-line eradication, while nearly a quarter of respondents did not utilize bismuth due to concerns about adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survey reveals a lack of adherence to the current H. pylori guidelines for diagnosis, testing and treatment among gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows in India. It is vital that scientific societies simplify guidelines, investigate challenges to their effective implementation and execute targeted interventions to increase adherence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-024-01694-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-024-01694-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在治疗幽门螺旋杆菌(H. pylori)感染方面,患者和初级保健提供者都能从消化内科医生的专业知识中获益匪浅。然而,世界上有关胃肠病学家治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的信息却很少。本研究旨在评估印度胃肠病学家和胃肠病学研究员的实践模式:方法:这是一项针对在印度工作的胃肠病学家和胃肠病学研究员的横断面问卷调查:共有 207 名消化内科医生和 53 名研究员填写了问卷。收到的答复来自印度各地。约 70% 的受访者认为幽门螺杆菌是一种胃部病原体,20% 的受访者认为它是一种共生细菌。对于未经调查但无报警症状的消化不良,选择检测和治疗方法的受访者比例(34.6%)与经验性质子泵抑制剂(PPI)疗法(38.8%)相当,但约五分之一的受访者在这种情况下选择了范围和治疗策略。即使在没有报警信号的情况下,超过一半的受访者(61.5%)也会选择内镜活检来检测幽门螺杆菌。虽然快速尿素酶检测(RUT)是检测幽门螺杆菌的首选方法(80%),但约三分之一的受访者倾向于单点 RUT(从胃窦)。只有 40% 的人在进行活检时遵循了最新的悉尼方案,大多数人(78.8%)在检测幽门螺杆菌前无法停用 PPI。PPI-卡里霉素三联疗法是一线根除幽门螺杆菌的首选方案(67%),而近四分之一的受访者因担心不良反应而未使用铋剂:调查显示,印度的胃肠病学家和胃肠病学研究员缺乏对现行幽门螺杆菌诊断、检测和治疗指南的遵守。至关重要的是,科学协会应简化指南,调查有效实施指南所面临的挑战,并采取有针对性的干预措施来提高指南的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A survey of practice patterns and adherence to national and international guidelines on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection among gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows in India.

Background: Patients and primary care providers alike benefit greatly from the expertise of gastroenterologists when it comes to managing Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. However, information on gastroenterologists' practices in the management of H. pylori infection is scarce in this part of the world. This study aimed at evaluating the practice patterns of gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows in India.

Method: This was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey of gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows working in India.

Results: Total 207 gastroenterologists and 53 fellows filled out the questionnaire. Responses were received from all around India. Approximately 70% of respondents perceive H. pylori to be a gastric pathogen, while 20% regard it as a commensal bacterium. While the proportion of respondents who chose a test and treat method (34.6%) for uninvestigated dyspepsia without alarm symptoms was comparable to empirical proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy (38.8%), about one-fifth chose a scope and treat strategy in this setting. Even in the absence of alarm signs, more than half of respondents (61.5%) preferred endoscopic biopsy to detect H. pylori. While rapid urease testing (RUT) was the preferred modality (80%) for detecting H. pylori, about one-third preferred single-site RUT (from the antrum). Only 40% followed the Updated Sydney protocol, while performing biopsies and a majority (78.8%) are unable to discontinue PPIs before testing for H. pylori. PPI-clarithromycin-based triple treatment was the preferred regimen (67%) for first-line eradication, while nearly a quarter of respondents did not utilize bismuth due to concerns about adverse effects.

Conclusion: The survey reveals a lack of adherence to the current H. pylori guidelines for diagnosis, testing and treatment among gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows in India. It is vital that scientific societies simplify guidelines, investigate challenges to their effective implementation and execute targeted interventions to increase adherence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Gastroenterology aims to help doctors everywhere practise better medicine and to influence the debate on gastroenterology. To achieve these aims, we publish original scientific studies, state-of -the-art special articles, reports and papers commenting on the clinical, scientific and public health factors affecting aspects of gastroenterology. We shall be delighted to receive articles for publication in all of these categories and letters commenting on the contents of the Journal or on issues of interest to our readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信