通过 LCA 和 LCCA 比较冷喷涂、大气等离子喷涂和高速氧燃料工艺沉积 WC-Co 涂层的效果。

IF 3.4 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Heliyon Pub Date : 2024-10-05 eCollection Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38961
E Rúa Ramirez, A Silvello, E Torres Diaz, F Tornese, M G Gnoni, I Garcia Cano
{"title":"通过 LCA 和 LCCA 比较冷喷涂、大气等离子喷涂和高速氧燃料工艺沉积 WC-Co 涂层的效果。","authors":"E Rúa Ramirez, A Silvello, E Torres Diaz, F Tornese, M G Gnoni, I Garcia Cano","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, an environmental and economic assessment of WC-Co coatings deposited by Cold Gas Spray (CGS), Atmospheric Plasma Spray (APS) and High Velocity Oxy Fuel (HVOF) spray technologies is carried out. Using SimaPro LCA software, several environmental impact categories are analyzed to compare their environmental performance. The economic analysis includes capital and operating expenditures. The results have highlighted that all three processes exhibit low environmental impact in terms of CO2 emissions but the performance of the CGS process is heavily influenced by the low deformability of WC-Co, while the APS process is affected by high electricity consumption. In terms of economic analysis, the HVOF process exhibits the best performance, while the CGS process requires most time to deposit the coating, and consequently, it is the process where the workforce component is most significant. These results depend on the fact that CGS might not be the most suitable deposition technique for fabricating WC-Co coatings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12894,"journal":{"name":"Heliyon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of cold spray, atmospheric plasma spray and high velocity oxy fuel processes for WC-Co coatings deposition through LCA and LCCA.\",\"authors\":\"E Rúa Ramirez, A Silvello, E Torres Diaz, F Tornese, M G Gnoni, I Garcia Cano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this study, an environmental and economic assessment of WC-Co coatings deposited by Cold Gas Spray (CGS), Atmospheric Plasma Spray (APS) and High Velocity Oxy Fuel (HVOF) spray technologies is carried out. Using SimaPro LCA software, several environmental impact categories are analyzed to compare their environmental performance. The economic analysis includes capital and operating expenditures. The results have highlighted that all three processes exhibit low environmental impact in terms of CO2 emissions but the performance of the CGS process is heavily influenced by the low deformability of WC-Co, while the APS process is affected by high electricity consumption. In terms of economic analysis, the HVOF process exhibits the best performance, while the CGS process requires most time to deposit the coating, and consequently, it is the process where the workforce component is most significant. These results depend on the fact that CGS might not be the most suitable deposition technique for fabricating WC-Co coatings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heliyon\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492586/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heliyon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38961\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heliyon","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38961","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对冷气体喷雾(CGS)、大气等离子体喷雾(APS)和高速氧燃料(HVOF)喷雾技术沉积的 WC-Co 涂层进行了环境和经济评估。使用 SimaPro LCA 软件分析了几个环境影响类别,以比较它们的环境性能。经济分析包括资本支出和运营支出。结果表明,就二氧化碳排放量而言,三种工艺对环境的影响都较小,但 CGS 工艺的性能受到 WC-Co 低变形性的严重影响,而 APS 工艺则受到高耗电量的影响。从经济角度分析,HVOF 工艺的性能最好,而 CGS 工艺沉积涂层所需的时间最长,因此,该工艺的劳动力成本最高。这些结果说明,CGS 可能不是最适合制造 WC-Co 涂层的沉积技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of cold spray, atmospheric plasma spray and high velocity oxy fuel processes for WC-Co coatings deposition through LCA and LCCA.

In this study, an environmental and economic assessment of WC-Co coatings deposited by Cold Gas Spray (CGS), Atmospheric Plasma Spray (APS) and High Velocity Oxy Fuel (HVOF) spray technologies is carried out. Using SimaPro LCA software, several environmental impact categories are analyzed to compare their environmental performance. The economic analysis includes capital and operating expenditures. The results have highlighted that all three processes exhibit low environmental impact in terms of CO2 emissions but the performance of the CGS process is heavily influenced by the low deformability of WC-Co, while the APS process is affected by high electricity consumption. In terms of economic analysis, the HVOF process exhibits the best performance, while the CGS process requires most time to deposit the coating, and consequently, it is the process where the workforce component is most significant. These results depend on the fact that CGS might not be the most suitable deposition technique for fabricating WC-Co coatings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heliyon
Heliyon MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
2793
期刊介绍: Heliyon is an all-science, open access journal that is part of the Cell Press family. Any paper reporting scientifically accurate and valuable research, which adheres to accepted ethical and scientific publishing standards, will be considered for publication. Our growing team of dedicated section editors, along with our in-house team, handle your paper and manage the publication process end-to-end, giving your research the editorial support it deserves.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信