利用临床直觉提高表型驱动优先排序的准确性。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Martha A. Beckwith , Daniel Danis , Yasemin Bridges , Julius O.B. Jacobsen , Damian Smedley , Peter N. Robinson
{"title":"利用临床直觉提高表型驱动优先排序的准确性。","authors":"Martha A. Beckwith ,&nbsp;Daniel Danis ,&nbsp;Yasemin Bridges ,&nbsp;Julius O.B. Jacobsen ,&nbsp;Damian Smedley ,&nbsp;Peter N. Robinson","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2024.101292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Clinical intuition is commonly incorporated into the differential diagnosis as an assessment of the likelihood of candidate diagnoses based either on the patient population being seen in a specific clinic or on the signs and symptoms of the initial presentation. Algorithms to support diagnostic sequencing in individuals with a suspected rare genetic disease do not yet incorporate intuition and instead assume that each Mendelian disease has an equal pretest probability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The LIkelihood Ratio Interpretation of Clinical AbnormaLities (LIRICAL) algorithm calculates the likelihood ratio of clinical manifestations represented by Human Phenotype Ontology terms to rank candidate diagnoses. The initial version of LIRICAL assumed an equal pretest probability for each disease in its calculation of the posttest probability (where the test is diagnostic exome or genome sequencing). We introduce Clinical Intuition for Likelihood Ratios (ClintLR), an extension of the LIRICAL algorithm that boosts the pretest probability of groups of related diseases deemed to be more likely.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average rank of the correct diagnosis in simulations using ClintLR showed a statistically significant improvement over a range of adjustment factors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ClintLR successfully encodes clinical intuition to improve ranking of rare diseases in diagnostic sequencing. ClintLR is freely available at <span><span>https://github.com/TheJacksonLaboratory/ClintLR</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":"27 1","pages":"Article 101292"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging clinical intuition to improve accuracy of phenotype-driven prioritization\",\"authors\":\"Martha A. Beckwith ,&nbsp;Daniel Danis ,&nbsp;Yasemin Bridges ,&nbsp;Julius O.B. Jacobsen ,&nbsp;Damian Smedley ,&nbsp;Peter N. Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gim.2024.101292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Clinical intuition is commonly incorporated into the differential diagnosis as an assessment of the likelihood of candidate diagnoses based either on the patient population being seen in a specific clinic or on the signs and symptoms of the initial presentation. Algorithms to support diagnostic sequencing in individuals with a suspected rare genetic disease do not yet incorporate intuition and instead assume that each Mendelian disease has an equal pretest probability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The LIkelihood Ratio Interpretation of Clinical AbnormaLities (LIRICAL) algorithm calculates the likelihood ratio of clinical manifestations represented by Human Phenotype Ontology terms to rank candidate diagnoses. The initial version of LIRICAL assumed an equal pretest probability for each disease in its calculation of the posttest probability (where the test is diagnostic exome or genome sequencing). We introduce Clinical Intuition for Likelihood Ratios (ClintLR), an extension of the LIRICAL algorithm that boosts the pretest probability of groups of related diseases deemed to be more likely.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average rank of the correct diagnosis in simulations using ClintLR showed a statistically significant improvement over a range of adjustment factors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ClintLR successfully encodes clinical intuition to improve ranking of rare diseases in diagnostic sequencing. ClintLR is freely available at <span><span>https://github.com/TheJacksonLaboratory/ClintLR</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genetics in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genetics in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360024002260\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360024002260","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:临床直觉通常被纳入鉴别诊断中,作为根据特定诊所就诊的患者群体或最初表现的体征和症状对候选诊断可能性的评估。支持对疑似罕见遗传病患者进行诊断测序的算法尚未纳入直觉,而是假定每种孟德尔疾病的检测前概率相同:LIRICAL算法计算人类表型本体(HPO)术语所代表的临床表现的似然比,对候选诊断进行排序。LIRICAL 算法的初始版本在计算检测后概率时假定每种疾病的检测前概率相同(检测为诊断性外显子组或基因组测序)。我们引入了临床直觉似然比(Clinical Intuition for Likelihood Ratios,ClintLR),它是 LIRICAL 算法的扩展,可提高被认为更有可能的相关疾病组的检测前概率:结果:在使用 ClintLR 的模拟实验中,正确诊断的平均等级在一系列调整因素的作用下有显著的统计学改善:结论:ClintLR 成功地编码了临床直觉,提高了诊断测序中罕见病的排序。ClintLR 可在 https://github.com/TheJacksonLaboratory/ClintLR 免费获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leveraging clinical intuition to improve accuracy of phenotype-driven prioritization

Purpose

Clinical intuition is commonly incorporated into the differential diagnosis as an assessment of the likelihood of candidate diagnoses based either on the patient population being seen in a specific clinic or on the signs and symptoms of the initial presentation. Algorithms to support diagnostic sequencing in individuals with a suspected rare genetic disease do not yet incorporate intuition and instead assume that each Mendelian disease has an equal pretest probability.

Methods

The LIkelihood Ratio Interpretation of Clinical AbnormaLities (LIRICAL) algorithm calculates the likelihood ratio of clinical manifestations represented by Human Phenotype Ontology terms to rank candidate diagnoses. The initial version of LIRICAL assumed an equal pretest probability for each disease in its calculation of the posttest probability (where the test is diagnostic exome or genome sequencing). We introduce Clinical Intuition for Likelihood Ratios (ClintLR), an extension of the LIRICAL algorithm that boosts the pretest probability of groups of related diseases deemed to be more likely.

Results

The average rank of the correct diagnosis in simulations using ClintLR showed a statistically significant improvement over a range of adjustment factors.

Conclusion

ClintLR successfully encodes clinical intuition to improve ranking of rare diseases in diagnostic sequencing. ClintLR is freely available at https://github.com/TheJacksonLaboratory/ClintLR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genetics in Medicine
Genetics in Medicine 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.80%
发文量
857
审稿时长
1.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health. GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信