自体细胞疗法在不断变化的监管环境中的临床应用:患者体验和看法调查。

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2024-08-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.141002.2
Ubaka Ogbogu, Nevicia Case
{"title":"自体细胞疗法在不断变化的监管环境中的临床应用:患者体验和看法调查。","authors":"Ubaka Ogbogu, Nevicia Case","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.141002.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Clinical treatments involving autologous cell-based therapies (ACBT) remain prevalent despite a lack of scientific backing and an evolving regulatory landscape aimed at assessing their safety and efficacy for clinical adoption. This study seeks to assess patients' experiences and perceptions of clinical treatments involving ACBT and their knowledge and views of the regulatory context and associated governance issues. <b>Methods</b>: An anonymous online survey of 181 participants who have been treated or are in the process of being treated with ACBT was conducted. Recruitment was via social media platforms. Data was collected through Qualtrics and analyzed using SPSS 29 for the quantitative responses and NVivo 1.7.1 for the qualitative responses. <b>Results</b>: Several themes emerged from the data, including the prominent role of healthcare providers throughout the patient journey, informational practices during the clinical encounter, the high prevalence of pay-for-participation trials, patients' gaps in regulatory knowledge, and patients' priorities regarding clinical trials and regulation of ACBT. <b>Conclusions</b>: The study makes a novel contribution to the literature by providing the first analysis of patients' experiences and perceptions of an emerging cell-based therapy within an evolving regulatory landscape. The findings serve as a valuable resource for developing policy, promoting scientific rigor, and ensuring ethical oversight of ACBT and other upcoming cell-based therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489844/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical use of autologous cell-based therapies in an evolving regulatory landscape: A survey of patient experiences and perceptions.\",\"authors\":\"Ubaka Ogbogu, Nevicia Case\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/f1000research.141002.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Clinical treatments involving autologous cell-based therapies (ACBT) remain prevalent despite a lack of scientific backing and an evolving regulatory landscape aimed at assessing their safety and efficacy for clinical adoption. This study seeks to assess patients' experiences and perceptions of clinical treatments involving ACBT and their knowledge and views of the regulatory context and associated governance issues. <b>Methods</b>: An anonymous online survey of 181 participants who have been treated or are in the process of being treated with ACBT was conducted. Recruitment was via social media platforms. Data was collected through Qualtrics and analyzed using SPSS 29 for the quantitative responses and NVivo 1.7.1 for the qualitative responses. <b>Results</b>: Several themes emerged from the data, including the prominent role of healthcare providers throughout the patient journey, informational practices during the clinical encounter, the high prevalence of pay-for-participation trials, patients' gaps in regulatory knowledge, and patients' priorities regarding clinical trials and regulation of ACBT. <b>Conclusions</b>: The study makes a novel contribution to the literature by providing the first analysis of patients' experiences and perceptions of an emerging cell-based therapy within an evolving regulatory landscape. The findings serve as a valuable resource for developing policy, promoting scientific rigor, and ensuring ethical oversight of ACBT and other upcoming cell-based therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"F1000Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489844/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"F1000Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.141002.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.141002.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管自体细胞疗法(ACBT)缺乏科学依据,而且旨在评估其临床应用安全性和有效性的监管环境也在不断变化,但涉及自体细胞疗法的临床治疗仍很普遍。本研究旨在评估患者对涉及 ACBT 的临床治疗的体验和看法,以及他们对监管环境和相关管理问题的了解和看法。研究方法对 181 名接受过或正在接受 ACBT 治疗的参与者进行匿名在线调查。通过社交媒体平台进行招募。数据通过 Qualtrics 收集,并使用 SPSS 29 对定量回答进行分析,使用 NVivo 1.7.1 对定性回答进行分析。结果从数据中发现了几个主题,包括医疗服务提供者在整个患者治疗过程中的突出作用、临床诊疗过程中的信息实践、付费参与试验的高流行率、患者在监管知识方面的差距以及患者在 ACBT 临床试验和监管方面的优先考虑事项。结论:本研究首次分析了患者在不断变化的监管环境中对新兴细胞疗法的体验和看法,为文献做出了新的贡献。研究结果是制定政策、促进科学严谨性、确保对 ACBT 和其他即将推出的细胞疗法进行伦理监督的宝贵资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical use of autologous cell-based therapies in an evolving regulatory landscape: A survey of patient experiences and perceptions.

Background: Clinical treatments involving autologous cell-based therapies (ACBT) remain prevalent despite a lack of scientific backing and an evolving regulatory landscape aimed at assessing their safety and efficacy for clinical adoption. This study seeks to assess patients' experiences and perceptions of clinical treatments involving ACBT and their knowledge and views of the regulatory context and associated governance issues. Methods: An anonymous online survey of 181 participants who have been treated or are in the process of being treated with ACBT was conducted. Recruitment was via social media platforms. Data was collected through Qualtrics and analyzed using SPSS 29 for the quantitative responses and NVivo 1.7.1 for the qualitative responses. Results: Several themes emerged from the data, including the prominent role of healthcare providers throughout the patient journey, informational practices during the clinical encounter, the high prevalence of pay-for-participation trials, patients' gaps in regulatory knowledge, and patients' priorities regarding clinical trials and regulation of ACBT. Conclusions: The study makes a novel contribution to the literature by providing the first analysis of patients' experiences and perceptions of an emerging cell-based therapy within an evolving regulatory landscape. The findings serve as a valuable resource for developing policy, promoting scientific rigor, and ensuring ethical oversight of ACBT and other upcoming cell-based therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信