远程缺血周围调节抑制急性心肌梗死患者的心脏交感神经激活:随机对照试验。

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Takumi Kondo, Masahiro Seo, Tetsuya Watanabe, Takahisa Yamada, Takashi Morita, Masato Kawasaki, Atsushi Kikuchi, Tsutomu Kawai, Yuji Nishimoto, Jun Nakamura, Takeshi Fujita, Masanao Tanichi, Yongchol Chang, Yasushi Sakata, Masatake Fukunami
{"title":"远程缺血周围调节抑制急性心肌梗死患者的心脏交感神经激活:随机对照试验。","authors":"Takumi Kondo, Masahiro Seo, Tetsuya Watanabe, Takahisa Yamada, Takashi Morita, Masato Kawasaki, Atsushi Kikuchi, Tsutomu Kawai, Yuji Nishimoto, Jun Nakamura, Takeshi Fujita, Masanao Tanichi, Yongchol Chang, Yasushi Sakata, Masatake Fukunami","doi":"10.1007/s00259-024-06934-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Remote ischemic periconditioning (RIPC) has demonstrated cardioprotective effects and improved clinical outcomes as an adjunct to emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, whether RIPC affects the cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in patients with STEMI remains unclear. This study investigated the effects of RIPC on cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in patients with STEMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively assigned patients with STEMI who underwent emergent PCI to receive RIPC or no procedure (control group) upon arrival at the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The primary endpoint was cardiac sympathetic nerve activity assessed through the washout rate (WR) in cardiac <sup>123</sup>I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (<sup>123</sup>I-MIBG) imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the RIPC (n = 62) and control (n = 60) groups had similar demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline. Multivariable linear regression models revealed that the culprit lesion of the left anterior descending artery and hemoglobin level were significantly and independently associated with WR at discharge. WRs of the groups differed insignificantly at discharge. However, the RIPC group (n = 49) showed significantly lower WR than the control group (n = 47) at 1 year after discharge (p = 0.027). In the single-photon emission computed tomography analysis at 1 year after discharge, the RIPC group demonstrated significantly higher late uptake (p = 0.021) and lower WR (p = 0.013) in the nonculprit lesion, with a non-significant decrease in WR for the culprit lesion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RIPC can suppress augmented cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in patients with STEMI, particularly in nonculprit lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"1060-1072"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote ischemic periconditioning suppresses cardiac sympathetic activation in acute myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Takumi Kondo, Masahiro Seo, Tetsuya Watanabe, Takahisa Yamada, Takashi Morita, Masato Kawasaki, Atsushi Kikuchi, Tsutomu Kawai, Yuji Nishimoto, Jun Nakamura, Takeshi Fujita, Masanao Tanichi, Yongchol Chang, Yasushi Sakata, Masatake Fukunami\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00259-024-06934-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Remote ischemic periconditioning (RIPC) has demonstrated cardioprotective effects and improved clinical outcomes as an adjunct to emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, whether RIPC affects the cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in patients with STEMI remains unclear. This study investigated the effects of RIPC on cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in patients with STEMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively assigned patients with STEMI who underwent emergent PCI to receive RIPC or no procedure (control group) upon arrival at the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The primary endpoint was cardiac sympathetic nerve activity assessed through the washout rate (WR) in cardiac <sup>123</sup>I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (<sup>123</sup>I-MIBG) imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the RIPC (n = 62) and control (n = 60) groups had similar demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline. Multivariable linear regression models revealed that the culprit lesion of the left anterior descending artery and hemoglobin level were significantly and independently associated with WR at discharge. WRs of the groups differed insignificantly at discharge. However, the RIPC group (n = 49) showed significantly lower WR than the control group (n = 47) at 1 year after discharge (p = 0.027). In the single-photon emission computed tomography analysis at 1 year after discharge, the RIPC group demonstrated significantly higher late uptake (p = 0.021) and lower WR (p = 0.013) in the nonculprit lesion, with a non-significant decrease in WR for the culprit lesion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RIPC can suppress augmented cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in patients with STEMI, particularly in nonculprit lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1060-1072\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-024-06934-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-024-06934-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的作为 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者紧急经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的辅助治疗手段,远程缺血预处理(RIPC)具有心脏保护作用并能改善临床预后。然而,RIPC 是否会影响 STEMI 患者的心脏交感神经活动仍不清楚。本研究探讨了 RIPC 对 STEMI 患者心脏交感神经活动的影响:我们对接受急诊 PCI 的 STEMI 患者进行了前瞻性分配,让他们在到达心导管室时接受 RIPC 或不接受任何手术(对照组)。主要终点是通过心脏123I-甲碘苄基胍(123I-MIBG)成像的洗脱率(WR)评估心脏交感神经活性:RIPC组(n = 62)和对照组(n = 60)患者的基线人口统计学特征和临床特征相似。多变量线性回归模型显示,左前降支动脉的罪魁祸首病变和血红蛋白水平与出院时的WR显著且独立相关。各组出院时的 WR 差异不大。然而,出院 1 年后,RIPC 组(n = 49)的 WR 明显低于对照组(n = 47)(p = 0.027)。在出院 1 年后的单光子发射计算机断层扫描分析中,RIPC 组非病灶的晚期摄取量明显增加(p = 0.021),WR 明显降低(p = 0.013),而病灶的 WR 降幅不明显:结论:RIPC 可抑制 STEMI 患者增强的心脏交感神经活动,尤其是在非结节性病变中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Remote ischemic periconditioning suppresses cardiac sympathetic activation in acute myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial.

Remote ischemic periconditioning suppresses cardiac sympathetic activation in acute myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: Remote ischemic periconditioning (RIPC) has demonstrated cardioprotective effects and improved clinical outcomes as an adjunct to emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, whether RIPC affects the cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in patients with STEMI remains unclear. This study investigated the effects of RIPC on cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in patients with STEMI.

Methods: We prospectively assigned patients with STEMI who underwent emergent PCI to receive RIPC or no procedure (control group) upon arrival at the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The primary endpoint was cardiac sympathetic nerve activity assessed through the washout rate (WR) in cardiac 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) imaging.

Results: Patients in the RIPC (n = 62) and control (n = 60) groups had similar demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline. Multivariable linear regression models revealed that the culprit lesion of the left anterior descending artery and hemoglobin level were significantly and independently associated with WR at discharge. WRs of the groups differed insignificantly at discharge. However, the RIPC group (n = 49) showed significantly lower WR than the control group (n = 47) at 1 year after discharge (p = 0.027). In the single-photon emission computed tomography analysis at 1 year after discharge, the RIPC group demonstrated significantly higher late uptake (p = 0.021) and lower WR (p = 0.013) in the nonculprit lesion, with a non-significant decrease in WR for the culprit lesion.

Conclusion: RIPC can suppress augmented cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in patients with STEMI, particularly in nonculprit lesions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信