利用人工智能提高早期结直肠癌的内窥镜识别率:当前证据与未来方向。

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2024-10-10 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2403-3103
Ayla Thijssen, Ramon-Michel Schreuder, Nikoo Dehghani, Marieke Schor, Peter H N de With, Fons van der Sommen, Jurjen J Boonstra, Leon M G Moons, Erik J Schoon
{"title":"利用人工智能提高早期结直肠癌的内窥镜识别率:当前证据与未来方向。","authors":"Ayla Thijssen, Ramon-Michel Schreuder, Nikoo Dehghani, Marieke Schor, Peter H N de With, Fons van der Sommen, Jurjen J Boonstra, Leon M G Moons, Erik J Schoon","doi":"10.1055/a-2403-3103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Artificial intelligence (AI) has great potential to improve endoscopic recognition of early stage colorectal carcinoma (CRC). This scoping review aimed to summarize current evidence on this topic, provide an overview of the methodologies currently used, and guide future research. <b>Methods</b> A systematic search was performed following the PRISMA-Scr guideline. PubMed (including Medline), Scopus, Embase, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library were searched up to January 2024. Studies were eligible for inclusion when using AI for distinguishing CRC from colorectal polyps on endoscopic imaging, using histopathology as gold standard, reporting sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy as outcomes. <b>Results</b> Of 5024 screened articles, 26 were included. Computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system classification categories ranged from two categories, such as lesions suitable or unsuitable for endoscopic resection, to five categories, such as hyperplastic polyp, sessile serrated lesion, adenoma, cancer, and other. The number of images used in testing databases varied from 69 to 84,585. Diagnostic performances were divergent, with sensitivities varying from 55.0% to 99.2%, specificities from 67.5% to 100% and accuracies from 74.4% to 94.4%. <b>Conclusions</b> This review highlights that using AI to improve endoscopic recognition of early stage CRC is an upcoming research field. We introduced a suggestions list of essential subjects to report in research regarding the development of endoscopy CADx systems, aiming to facilitate more complete reporting and better comparability between studies. There is a knowledge gap regarding real-time CADx system performance during multicenter external validation. Future research should focus on development of CADx systems that can differentiate CRC from premalignant lesions, while providing an indication of invasion depth.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 10","pages":"E1102-E1117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the endoscopic recognition of early colorectal carcinoma using artificial intelligence: current evidence and future directions.\",\"authors\":\"Ayla Thijssen, Ramon-Michel Schreuder, Nikoo Dehghani, Marieke Schor, Peter H N de With, Fons van der Sommen, Jurjen J Boonstra, Leon M G Moons, Erik J Schoon\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2403-3103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Artificial intelligence (AI) has great potential to improve endoscopic recognition of early stage colorectal carcinoma (CRC). This scoping review aimed to summarize current evidence on this topic, provide an overview of the methodologies currently used, and guide future research. <b>Methods</b> A systematic search was performed following the PRISMA-Scr guideline. PubMed (including Medline), Scopus, Embase, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library were searched up to January 2024. Studies were eligible for inclusion when using AI for distinguishing CRC from colorectal polyps on endoscopic imaging, using histopathology as gold standard, reporting sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy as outcomes. <b>Results</b> Of 5024 screened articles, 26 were included. Computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system classification categories ranged from two categories, such as lesions suitable or unsuitable for endoscopic resection, to five categories, such as hyperplastic polyp, sessile serrated lesion, adenoma, cancer, and other. The number of images used in testing databases varied from 69 to 84,585. Diagnostic performances were divergent, with sensitivities varying from 55.0% to 99.2%, specificities from 67.5% to 100% and accuracies from 74.4% to 94.4%. <b>Conclusions</b> This review highlights that using AI to improve endoscopic recognition of early stage CRC is an upcoming research field. We introduced a suggestions list of essential subjects to report in research regarding the development of endoscopy CADx systems, aiming to facilitate more complete reporting and better comparability between studies. There is a knowledge gap regarding real-time CADx system performance during multicenter external validation. Future research should focus on development of CADx systems that can differentiate CRC from premalignant lesions, while providing an indication of invasion depth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"12 10\",\"pages\":\"E1102-E1117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466514/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2403-3103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2403-3103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的 人工智能(AI)在提高早期结直肠癌(CRC)的内窥镜识别能力方面具有巨大潜力。本范围综述旨在总结有关该主题的现有证据,概述目前使用的方法,并为未来研究提供指导。方法 按照 PRISMA-Scr 指南进行了系统性检索。对截至 2024 年 1 月的 PubMed(包括 Medline)、Scopus、Embase、IEEE Xplore 和 ACM 数字图书馆进行了检索。凡使用人工智能在内窥镜成像上区分 CRC 和结直肠息肉、使用组织病理学作为金标准、报告灵敏度、特异性或准确性作为结果的研究均符合纳入条件。结果 在筛选出的 5024 篇文章中,有 26 篇被纳入。计算机辅助诊断(CADx)系统分类从适合或不适合内镜切除的病变等两个类别到增生性息肉、无柄锯齿状病变、腺瘤、癌症和其他等五个类别不等。测试数据库中使用的图像数量从 69 幅到 84,585 幅不等。诊断性能各不相同,灵敏度从 55.0% 到 99.2% 不等,特异度从 67.5% 到 100% 不等,准确度从 74.4% 到 94.4% 不等。结论 本综述强调,使用人工智能提高早期 CRC 的内镜识别率是一个即将到来的研究领域。我们提出了一份建议清单,列出了内镜 CADx 系统开发研究中需要报告的基本主题,旨在促进更完整的报告和研究之间更好的可比性。在多中心外部验证过程中,有关实时 CADx 系统性能的知识还存在空白。未来的研究应侧重于开发能区分 CRC 和恶性前病变的 CADx 系统,同时提供侵袭深度的指示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the endoscopic recognition of early colorectal carcinoma using artificial intelligence: current evidence and future directions.

Background and study aims Artificial intelligence (AI) has great potential to improve endoscopic recognition of early stage colorectal carcinoma (CRC). This scoping review aimed to summarize current evidence on this topic, provide an overview of the methodologies currently used, and guide future research. Methods A systematic search was performed following the PRISMA-Scr guideline. PubMed (including Medline), Scopus, Embase, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library were searched up to January 2024. Studies were eligible for inclusion when using AI for distinguishing CRC from colorectal polyps on endoscopic imaging, using histopathology as gold standard, reporting sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy as outcomes. Results Of 5024 screened articles, 26 were included. Computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system classification categories ranged from two categories, such as lesions suitable or unsuitable for endoscopic resection, to five categories, such as hyperplastic polyp, sessile serrated lesion, adenoma, cancer, and other. The number of images used in testing databases varied from 69 to 84,585. Diagnostic performances were divergent, with sensitivities varying from 55.0% to 99.2%, specificities from 67.5% to 100% and accuracies from 74.4% to 94.4%. Conclusions This review highlights that using AI to improve endoscopic recognition of early stage CRC is an upcoming research field. We introduced a suggestions list of essential subjects to report in research regarding the development of endoscopy CADx systems, aiming to facilitate more complete reporting and better comparability between studies. There is a knowledge gap regarding real-time CADx system performance during multicenter external validation. Future research should focus on development of CADx systems that can differentiate CRC from premalignant lesions, while providing an indication of invasion depth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信