Kawaiola C Aoki, Danielle Lazzara, Gregory Bartos, Eduardo Weiss, Eli R Saleeby
{"title":"莫氏手术中非黑色素瘤皮肤癌的手术边缘:皮肤镜与肉眼对比","authors":"Kawaiola C Aoki, Danielle Lazzara, Gregory Bartos, Eduardo Weiss, Eli R Saleeby","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) offers high cure rates for nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) but relies on precise margin assessment, traditionally initiated by the naked eye. Dermoscopy has emerged as a potential tool to improve margin delineation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of dermoscopic versus naked eye evaluation in marking initial MMS margins for NMSC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, prospective study on patients with NMSC undergoing MMS was conducted. Patients were randomized into dermoscopy and naked eye groups. Statistical analysis was performed using statistical package for social sciences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 127 patients were enrolled, with 63 in the naked eye group and 64 in the dermoscopy group. No significant differences in age, sex distribution, or histological subtype were found. The average number of MMS stages and accuracy of initial margins were comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite its potential, the authors' study found no significant reduction in total MMS stages using dermoscopy. Novel imaging modalities or standardized dermoscopic criteria should be explored to enhance margin assessment accuracy and improve outcomes in NMSC treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dermoscopic evaluation of presurgical margins does not effectively assess lateral/deep margins nor contribute to a reduction in total MMS stages. Improving the authors' understanding of presurgical margin assessment techniques can lead to better treatment outcomes for NMSC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical Margins of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers in Mohs Surgery: Dermoscopy Versus Naked Eye.\",\"authors\":\"Kawaiola C Aoki, Danielle Lazzara, Gregory Bartos, Eduardo Weiss, Eli R Saleeby\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) offers high cure rates for nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) but relies on precise margin assessment, traditionally initiated by the naked eye. Dermoscopy has emerged as a potential tool to improve margin delineation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of dermoscopic versus naked eye evaluation in marking initial MMS margins for NMSC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, prospective study on patients with NMSC undergoing MMS was conducted. Patients were randomized into dermoscopy and naked eye groups. Statistical analysis was performed using statistical package for social sciences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 127 patients were enrolled, with 63 in the naked eye group and 64 in the dermoscopy group. No significant differences in age, sex distribution, or histological subtype were found. The average number of MMS stages and accuracy of initial margins were comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite its potential, the authors' study found no significant reduction in total MMS stages using dermoscopy. Novel imaging modalities or standardized dermoscopic criteria should be explored to enhance margin assessment accuracy and improve outcomes in NMSC treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dermoscopic evaluation of presurgical margins does not effectively assess lateral/deep margins nor contribute to a reduction in total MMS stages. Improving the authors' understanding of presurgical margin assessment techniques can lead to better treatment outcomes for NMSC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatologic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatologic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004455\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004455","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Surgical Margins of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers in Mohs Surgery: Dermoscopy Versus Naked Eye.
Background: Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) offers high cure rates for nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) but relies on precise margin assessment, traditionally initiated by the naked eye. Dermoscopy has emerged as a potential tool to improve margin delineation.
Objective: To compare the efficacy of dermoscopic versus naked eye evaluation in marking initial MMS margins for NMSC.
Methods: A multicenter, prospective study on patients with NMSC undergoing MMS was conducted. Patients were randomized into dermoscopy and naked eye groups. Statistical analysis was performed using statistical package for social sciences.
Results: A total of 127 patients were enrolled, with 63 in the naked eye group and 64 in the dermoscopy group. No significant differences in age, sex distribution, or histological subtype were found. The average number of MMS stages and accuracy of initial margins were comparable between groups.
Discussion: Despite its potential, the authors' study found no significant reduction in total MMS stages using dermoscopy. Novel imaging modalities or standardized dermoscopic criteria should be explored to enhance margin assessment accuracy and improve outcomes in NMSC treatment.
Conclusion: Dermoscopic evaluation of presurgical margins does not effectively assess lateral/deep margins nor contribute to a reduction in total MMS stages. Improving the authors' understanding of presurgical margin assessment techniques can lead to better treatment outcomes for NMSC.
期刊介绍:
Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including:
-Ambulatory phlebectomy-
Blepharoplasty-
Body contouring-
Chemical peels-
Cryosurgery-
Curettage and desiccation-
Dermabrasion-
Excision and closure-
Flap Surgery-
Grafting-
Hair restoration surgery-
Injectable neuromodulators-
Laser surgery-
Liposuction-
Microdermabrasion-
Microlipoinjection-
Micropigmentation-
Mohs micrographic surgery-
Nail surgery-
Phlebology-
Sclerotherapy-
Skin cancer surgery-
Skin resurfacing-
Soft-tissue fillers.
Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.