继发于聚维酮碘的接触性皮炎:系统综述。

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Harriet Kennedy
{"title":"继发于聚维酮碘的接触性皮炎:系统综述。","authors":"Harriet Kennedy","doi":"10.1111/cod.14712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cutaneous reactions to povidone (PVP)-iodine are widely reported; however, distinction between allergic and irritant reactions can be challenging. Free iodine is responsible for irritant reactions and is released when PVP-iodine is in a liquid state. The aim of this study was to review the clinical presentation and results of patch testing in patients with PVP-iodine contact dermatitis. A systematic review was conducted by searching Pubmed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases for reports of contact dermatitis secondary to PVP-iodine. Data were collated including study design, patient age and gender identity, iodine exposure, skin biopsy findings, and patch test methodology and results. The search revealed 187 reports with 38 eligible studies; 30 case reports/case series and 8 retrospective cohort studies. Overall, there were 223 patients with PVP-iodine contact dermatitis. The commonest reaction was irritant contact dermatitis (51%), followed by allergic contact dermatitis (40%) and contact dermatitis not further specified (9%). Irritant reactions were characterised by burn-like morphology and, when due to surgical skin disinfectant, were often distant from the surgical incision site. Patch testing was most often performed with a 10% PVP-iodine aqueous solution; however, irritant reactions in controls occur. Various testing methods including iodine in petrolatum, ethanol, dried powder, and open application testing were described. Most reactions to PVP-iodine are irritant and patch testing using a closed-chamber method yields inconsistent results due to risk of irritation from free iodine release over the 2-day occlusion time. Surgeons should be aware of the risk of prolonged skin contact with wet iodine solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contact dermatitis secondary to povidone-iodine: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Harriet Kennedy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cod.14712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cutaneous reactions to povidone (PVP)-iodine are widely reported; however, distinction between allergic and irritant reactions can be challenging. Free iodine is responsible for irritant reactions and is released when PVP-iodine is in a liquid state. The aim of this study was to review the clinical presentation and results of patch testing in patients with PVP-iodine contact dermatitis. A systematic review was conducted by searching Pubmed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases for reports of contact dermatitis secondary to PVP-iodine. Data were collated including study design, patient age and gender identity, iodine exposure, skin biopsy findings, and patch test methodology and results. The search revealed 187 reports with 38 eligible studies; 30 case reports/case series and 8 retrospective cohort studies. Overall, there were 223 patients with PVP-iodine contact dermatitis. The commonest reaction was irritant contact dermatitis (51%), followed by allergic contact dermatitis (40%) and contact dermatitis not further specified (9%). Irritant reactions were characterised by burn-like morphology and, when due to surgical skin disinfectant, were often distant from the surgical incision site. Patch testing was most often performed with a 10% PVP-iodine aqueous solution; however, irritant reactions in controls occur. Various testing methods including iodine in petrolatum, ethanol, dried powder, and open application testing were described. Most reactions to PVP-iodine are irritant and patch testing using a closed-chamber method yields inconsistent results due to risk of irritation from free iodine release over the 2-day occlusion time. Surgeons should be aware of the risk of prolonged skin contact with wet iodine solution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contact Dermatitis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contact Dermatitis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14712\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Dermatitis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14712","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

聚维酮(PVP)-碘引起的皮肤反应屡见报端,但要区分过敏反应和刺激性反应却很困难。游离碘是刺激性反应的元凶,当聚维酮-碘处于液态时游离碘就会释放出来。本研究旨在回顾 PVP-碘接触性皮炎患者的临床表现和斑贴试验结果。通过搜索 Pubmed、MEDLINE 和 Google Scholar 数据库中有关继发于 PVP-iodine 的接触性皮炎的报道,进行了系统性综述。整理的数据包括研究设计、患者年龄和性别特征、碘接触情况、皮肤活检结果以及斑贴试验方法和结果。搜索结果显示有 187 篇报告,其中 38 篇符合条件;30 篇病例报告/病例系列和 8 篇回顾性队列研究。共有 223 名患者患有 PVP-碘接触性皮炎。最常见的反应是刺激性接触性皮炎(51%),其次是过敏性接触性皮炎(40%)和未进一步说明的接触性皮炎(9%)。刺激性反应以烧灼样形态为特征,如果是手术皮肤消毒剂引起的,则通常远离手术切口部位。斑贴试验最常用的是 10%PVP-碘水溶液,但对照组也会出现刺激性反应。描述了各种测试方法,包括将碘溶于凡士林油、乙醇、干粉和开放应用测试。PVP-iodine 的大多数反应都是刺激性的,使用密闭室方法进行贴片测试会产生不一致的结果,这是因为在 2 天的闭塞时间内,游离碘的释放可能会造成刺激。外科医生应注意皮肤长时间接触湿碘溶液的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contact dermatitis secondary to povidone-iodine: A systematic review.

Cutaneous reactions to povidone (PVP)-iodine are widely reported; however, distinction between allergic and irritant reactions can be challenging. Free iodine is responsible for irritant reactions and is released when PVP-iodine is in a liquid state. The aim of this study was to review the clinical presentation and results of patch testing in patients with PVP-iodine contact dermatitis. A systematic review was conducted by searching Pubmed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases for reports of contact dermatitis secondary to PVP-iodine. Data were collated including study design, patient age and gender identity, iodine exposure, skin biopsy findings, and patch test methodology and results. The search revealed 187 reports with 38 eligible studies; 30 case reports/case series and 8 retrospective cohort studies. Overall, there were 223 patients with PVP-iodine contact dermatitis. The commonest reaction was irritant contact dermatitis (51%), followed by allergic contact dermatitis (40%) and contact dermatitis not further specified (9%). Irritant reactions were characterised by burn-like morphology and, when due to surgical skin disinfectant, were often distant from the surgical incision site. Patch testing was most often performed with a 10% PVP-iodine aqueous solution; however, irritant reactions in controls occur. Various testing methods including iodine in petrolatum, ethanol, dried powder, and open application testing were described. Most reactions to PVP-iodine are irritant and patch testing using a closed-chamber method yields inconsistent results due to risk of irritation from free iodine release over the 2-day occlusion time. Surgeons should be aware of the risk of prolonged skin contact with wet iodine solution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contact Dermatitis
Contact Dermatitis 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
30.90%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Contact Dermatitis is designed primarily as a journal for clinicians who are interested in various aspects of environmental dermatitis. This includes both allergic and irritant (toxic) types of contact dermatitis, occupational (industrial) dermatitis and consumers" dermatitis from such products as cosmetics and toiletries. The journal aims at promoting and maintaining communication among dermatologists, industrial physicians, allergists and clinical immunologists, as well as chemists and research workers involved in industry and the production of consumer goods. Papers are invited on clinical observations, diagnosis and methods of investigation of patients, therapeutic measures, organisation and legislation relating to the control of occupational and consumers".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信