经导管主动脉瓣新一代设备植入术后患者之前因心衰住院对临床预后的影响:LAPLACE-TAVI 登记的启示。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Motoki Fukutomi, Takayuki Onishi, Tomo Ando, Ryosuke Higuchi, Kenichi Hagiya, Mike Saji, Itaru Takamisawa, Nobuo Iguchi, Morimasa Takayama, Atsushi Shimizu, Jun Shimizu, Shinichiro Doi, Shinya Okazaki, Kei Sato, Harutoshi Tamura, Hiroaki Yokoyama, Shuichiro Takanashi, Tetsuya Tobaru
{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣新一代设备植入术后患者之前因心衰住院对临床预后的影响:LAPLACE-TAVI 登记的启示。","authors":"Motoki Fukutomi, Takayuki Onishi, Tomo Ando, Ryosuke Higuchi, Kenichi Hagiya, Mike Saji, Itaru Takamisawa, Nobuo Iguchi, Morimasa Takayama, Atsushi Shimizu, Jun Shimizu, Shinichiro Doi, Shinya Okazaki, Kei Sato, Harutoshi Tamura, Hiroaki Yokoyama, Shuichiro Takanashi, Tetsuya Tobaru","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A history of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement is associated with the prognosis of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, the impact of prior HHF on clinical outcomes after contemporary TAVI using new-generation transcatheter heart valves (THVs) has not been thoroughly investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the aLliAnce for exPloring cLinical prospects of AortiC valvE disease (LAPLACE)-TAVI registry, we investigated 2,752 patients who underwent TAVI with new-generation THVs with a median follow-up of 627 days. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and heart failure readmission after TAVI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with a history of HHF (n = 809) showed a higher 30-day mortality than patients without prior HHF (n = 1,943). A Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the prior HHF group showed a higher incidence of the primary outcome than the non-prior HHF group (27.4% vs. 16.4%, log-rank p = 0.001). In a Cox regression analysis, prior HHF was significantly associated with the risk of the primary outcome, even after adjusting for covariates (hazard ratio, 1.344; 95% confidence interval, 1.103-1.638; p = 0.003). A subanalysis showed that the prior HHF group with ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 50% had a higher risk of the primary outcome than the non-prior HHF group, whereas the prior HHF group with EF < 50% had the worst outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A history of prior HHF is associated with worse outcomes in patients with severe AS, both in those with preserved EF and those with reduced EF, even after TAVI using new-generation devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of prior hospitalization for heart failure on clinical outcomes of patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with new-generation devices: Insights from the LAPLACE-TAVI registry.\",\"authors\":\"Motoki Fukutomi, Takayuki Onishi, Tomo Ando, Ryosuke Higuchi, Kenichi Hagiya, Mike Saji, Itaru Takamisawa, Nobuo Iguchi, Morimasa Takayama, Atsushi Shimizu, Jun Shimizu, Shinichiro Doi, Shinya Okazaki, Kei Sato, Harutoshi Tamura, Hiroaki Yokoyama, Shuichiro Takanashi, Tetsuya Tobaru\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.31261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A history of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement is associated with the prognosis of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, the impact of prior HHF on clinical outcomes after contemporary TAVI using new-generation transcatheter heart valves (THVs) has not been thoroughly investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the aLliAnce for exPloring cLinical prospects of AortiC valvE disease (LAPLACE)-TAVI registry, we investigated 2,752 patients who underwent TAVI with new-generation THVs with a median follow-up of 627 days. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and heart failure readmission after TAVI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with a history of HHF (n = 809) showed a higher 30-day mortality than patients without prior HHF (n = 1,943). A Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the prior HHF group showed a higher incidence of the primary outcome than the non-prior HHF group (27.4% vs. 16.4%, log-rank p = 0.001). In a Cox regression analysis, prior HHF was significantly associated with the risk of the primary outcome, even after adjusting for covariates (hazard ratio, 1.344; 95% confidence interval, 1.103-1.638; p = 0.003). A subanalysis showed that the prior HHF group with ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 50% had a higher risk of the primary outcome than the non-prior HHF group, whereas the prior HHF group with EF < 50% had the worst outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A history of prior HHF is associated with worse outcomes in patients with severe AS, both in those with preserved EF and those with reduced EF, even after TAVI using new-generation devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31261\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31261","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)或手术主动脉瓣置换术前的心力衰竭(HHF)住院史与重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的预后有关。然而,对于使用新一代经导管心脏瓣膜(TAVI)进行当代TAVI术后,既往HHF对临床预后的影响尚未进行深入研究:方法: 我们利用新一代经导管心脏瓣膜(THV)临床前景评估(LAPLACE)-TAVI 登记数据,对 2752 名接受 TAVI 的患者进行了调查,中位随访时间为 627 天。主要结果是全因死亡率和TAVI术后心衰再入院率:结果:有HHF病史的患者(809人)的30天死亡率高于无HHF病史的患者(1943人)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,既往有HHF病史组的主要结局发生率高于无HHF病史组(27.4%对16.4%,log-rank p = 0.001)。在 Cox 回归分析中,即使调整了协变量,既往 HHF 仍与主要结局的风险显著相关(危险比为 1.344;95% 置信区间为 1.103-1.638;P = 0.003)。一项子分析表明,射血分数(EF)≥50%的既往HHF组发生主要结局的风险高于非既往HHF组,而射血分数(EF)≥50%的既往HHF组发生主要结局的风险高于非既往HHF组:既往HHF史与重度AS患者较差的预后有关,无论是EF保留的患者还是EF降低的患者,即使在使用新一代设备进行TAVI后也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of prior hospitalization for heart failure on clinical outcomes of patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with new-generation devices: Insights from the LAPLACE-TAVI registry.

Background: A history of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement is associated with the prognosis of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, the impact of prior HHF on clinical outcomes after contemporary TAVI using new-generation transcatheter heart valves (THVs) has not been thoroughly investigated.

Methods: Using data from the aLliAnce for exPloring cLinical prospects of AortiC valvE disease (LAPLACE)-TAVI registry, we investigated 2,752 patients who underwent TAVI with new-generation THVs with a median follow-up of 627 days. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and heart failure readmission after TAVI.

Results: Patients with a history of HHF (n = 809) showed a higher 30-day mortality than patients without prior HHF (n = 1,943). A Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the prior HHF group showed a higher incidence of the primary outcome than the non-prior HHF group (27.4% vs. 16.4%, log-rank p = 0.001). In a Cox regression analysis, prior HHF was significantly associated with the risk of the primary outcome, even after adjusting for covariates (hazard ratio, 1.344; 95% confidence interval, 1.103-1.638; p = 0.003). A subanalysis showed that the prior HHF group with ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 50% had a higher risk of the primary outcome than the non-prior HHF group, whereas the prior HHF group with EF < 50% had the worst outcome.

Conclusion: A history of prior HHF is associated with worse outcomes in patients with severe AS, both in those with preserved EF and those with reduced EF, even after TAVI using new-generation devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信