医用大麻持卡人身份与止吐药过度使用之间的关系。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Alan P Baltz, Cheng Peng, Laura Gressler, Sajjad Bhatti, Kanna Lewis
{"title":"医用大麻持卡人身份与止吐药过度使用之间的关系。","authors":"Alan P Baltz, Cheng Peng, Laura Gressler, Sajjad Bhatti, Kanna Lewis","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The conscientious prescribing of antiemetics by chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) risk was highlighted in the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) \"Choosing Wisely\" recommendations. The pharmacologic properties of medical marijuana (MMJ) may allow for decreased incidence of CINV; however, little is known about the effects of MMJ on the use of antiemetics. This study aimed to determine if MMJ cardholder status, which enables access to MMJ, is associated with antiemetic overuse among patients with cancer. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This population-based secondary data analysis examined a retrospective cohort derived from the linked Arkansas All Payers Claims Database (2013-2020) and MMJ cardholder registry (2013-2019). The cohort consisted of 20,558 patients with cancer aged 18 and older with a chemotherapy claim in an outpatient setting within 12 months of a cancer diagnosis. Exposure was a registration to receive an MMJ card that permitted access to MMJ. The primary outcome of interest was antiemetic overuse, as characterized by the ASCO recommendation. Antiemetic use associated with chemotherapy was identified through filled prescriptions and medical claims. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for baseline demographic and prescription characteristics, was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of antiemetic overuse among MMJ cardholders compared with non-MMJ cardholders. <b>Results:</b> Among 20,558 eligible patients, 436 (2.1%) had an MMJ card at some point in the study period. Antiemetic overuse was identified in 7.5% of chemotherapy cycles. Compared with non-MMJ cardholders, MMJ cardholders were less likely to experience antiemetics overuse (aOR: 0.76, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Patients with fewer chemotherapy cycles and younger in age had higher odds of antiemetic overuse compared with those with more chemotherapy cycles. The risk of antiemetic overuse did not differ based on gender and rurality of residency. Route of chemotherapy administration, CINV risk category, and type of cancer also impacted the odds of antiemetic overuse. <b>Discussion:</b> The findings indicate that MMJ cardholders are significantly less likely to experience antiemetic overuse than non-MMJ cardholders. Further investigation into the use, effectiveness, and safety of cannabis for CINV mitigation is needed to inform patient and provider decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Medical Marijuana Cardholder Status and Antiemetic Overuse.\",\"authors\":\"Alan P Baltz, Cheng Peng, Laura Gressler, Sajjad Bhatti, Kanna Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/can.2024.0083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The conscientious prescribing of antiemetics by chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) risk was highlighted in the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) \\\"Choosing Wisely\\\" recommendations. The pharmacologic properties of medical marijuana (MMJ) may allow for decreased incidence of CINV; however, little is known about the effects of MMJ on the use of antiemetics. This study aimed to determine if MMJ cardholder status, which enables access to MMJ, is associated with antiemetic overuse among patients with cancer. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This population-based secondary data analysis examined a retrospective cohort derived from the linked Arkansas All Payers Claims Database (2013-2020) and MMJ cardholder registry (2013-2019). The cohort consisted of 20,558 patients with cancer aged 18 and older with a chemotherapy claim in an outpatient setting within 12 months of a cancer diagnosis. Exposure was a registration to receive an MMJ card that permitted access to MMJ. The primary outcome of interest was antiemetic overuse, as characterized by the ASCO recommendation. Antiemetic use associated with chemotherapy was identified through filled prescriptions and medical claims. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for baseline demographic and prescription characteristics, was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of antiemetic overuse among MMJ cardholders compared with non-MMJ cardholders. <b>Results:</b> Among 20,558 eligible patients, 436 (2.1%) had an MMJ card at some point in the study period. Antiemetic overuse was identified in 7.5% of chemotherapy cycles. Compared with non-MMJ cardholders, MMJ cardholders were less likely to experience antiemetics overuse (aOR: 0.76, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Patients with fewer chemotherapy cycles and younger in age had higher odds of antiemetic overuse compared with those with more chemotherapy cycles. The risk of antiemetic overuse did not differ based on gender and rurality of residency. Route of chemotherapy administration, CINV risk category, and type of cancer also impacted the odds of antiemetic overuse. <b>Discussion:</b> The findings indicate that MMJ cardholders are significantly less likely to experience antiemetic overuse than non-MMJ cardholders. Further investigation into the use, effectiveness, and safety of cannabis for CINV mitigation is needed to inform patient and provider decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2024.0083\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2024.0083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)的 "明智选择"(Choosing Wisely)建议强调,化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)风险患者应谨慎使用止吐药。医用大麻(MMJ)的药理特性可能会降低 CINV 的发生率;然而,人们对医用大麻对使用止吐药的影响知之甚少。本研究旨在确定能够获得医用大麻的持卡人身份是否与癌症患者过度使用止吐药有关。材料与方法:这项基于人群的二次数据分析研究了一个回顾性队列,该队列来自于阿肯色州所有支付者索赔数据库(2013-2020 年)和 MMJ 持卡人登记表(2013-2019 年)。该队列由 20,558 名 18 岁及以上癌症患者组成,他们在确诊癌症后 12 个月内曾在门诊接受过化疗。暴露是指登记领取允许使用 MMJ 的 MMJ 卡。根据 ASCO 建议,主要研究结果是过度使用止吐药。通过已开具的处方和医疗报销单确定了与化疗相关的止吐药使用情况。在对基线人口统计学特征和处方特征进行调整后,采用多变量逻辑回归法计算出持有 MMJ 卡的患者与未持有 MMJ 卡的患者相比,过度使用止吐药的调整几率比 (aOR)。结果显示在 20558 名符合条件的患者中,有 436 人(2.1%)在研究期间的某个时间持有 MMJ 卡。在 7.5% 的化疗周期中发现了过度使用止吐药的情况。与未持有 MMJ 卡的患者相比,持有 MMJ 卡的患者不太可能过度使用止吐药(aOR:0.76,p < 0.001)。与化疗周期较多的患者相比,化疗周期较少、年龄较轻的患者出现止吐药过度使用的几率更高。止吐药过度使用的风险因性别和居住地的不同而无差异。化疗给药途径、CINV 风险类别和癌症类型也会影响过度使用止吐药的几率。讨论:研究结果表明,MMJ持卡人过度使用止吐药的几率明显低于非MMJ持卡人。需要进一步调查大麻用于缓解 CINV 的使用情况、有效性和安全性,以便为患者和医疗服务提供者的决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association Between Medical Marijuana Cardholder Status and Antiemetic Overuse.

Introduction: The conscientious prescribing of antiemetics by chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) risk was highlighted in the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) "Choosing Wisely" recommendations. The pharmacologic properties of medical marijuana (MMJ) may allow for decreased incidence of CINV; however, little is known about the effects of MMJ on the use of antiemetics. This study aimed to determine if MMJ cardholder status, which enables access to MMJ, is associated with antiemetic overuse among patients with cancer. Materials and Methods: This population-based secondary data analysis examined a retrospective cohort derived from the linked Arkansas All Payers Claims Database (2013-2020) and MMJ cardholder registry (2013-2019). The cohort consisted of 20,558 patients with cancer aged 18 and older with a chemotherapy claim in an outpatient setting within 12 months of a cancer diagnosis. Exposure was a registration to receive an MMJ card that permitted access to MMJ. The primary outcome of interest was antiemetic overuse, as characterized by the ASCO recommendation. Antiemetic use associated with chemotherapy was identified through filled prescriptions and medical claims. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for baseline demographic and prescription characteristics, was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of antiemetic overuse among MMJ cardholders compared with non-MMJ cardholders. Results: Among 20,558 eligible patients, 436 (2.1%) had an MMJ card at some point in the study period. Antiemetic overuse was identified in 7.5% of chemotherapy cycles. Compared with non-MMJ cardholders, MMJ cardholders were less likely to experience antiemetics overuse (aOR: 0.76, p < 0.001). Patients with fewer chemotherapy cycles and younger in age had higher odds of antiemetic overuse compared with those with more chemotherapy cycles. The risk of antiemetic overuse did not differ based on gender and rurality of residency. Route of chemotherapy administration, CINV risk category, and type of cancer also impacted the odds of antiemetic overuse. Discussion: The findings indicate that MMJ cardholders are significantly less likely to experience antiemetic overuse than non-MMJ cardholders. Further investigation into the use, effectiveness, and safety of cannabis for CINV mitigation is needed to inform patient and provider decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
164
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信