T3T4上尿路尿路上皮癌患者腹腔镜、机器人和开放式肾切除术加膀胱袖带切除术的疗效:一项多中心回顾性研究。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Jen-Kai Fang, Hsin-Chih Yeh, Hsiang-Ying Lee, Han-Yu Weng, Ta-Yao Tai, Chao-Yuan Huang, Jian-Hua Hong, Chih-Chin Yu, Shu-Yu Wu, Shiu-Dong Chung, Chung-You Tsai, Thomas Y Hsueh, Allen W Chiu, Yuan-Hong Jiang, Yu Khun, Lee, I-Hsuan Alan Chen, Jen-Tai Lin, Yung-Tai Chen, Chang-Min Lin, Ian-Seng Cheong, Hsu-Che Huang, Shih-Hsiu Lo, Wei-Yu Lin, Jen-Shu Tseng, Chia-Chang Wu, Shian-Shiang Wang, Yi-Huei Chang, Chao-Hsiang Chang
{"title":"T3T4上尿路尿路上皮癌患者腹腔镜、机器人和开放式肾切除术加膀胱袖带切除术的疗效:一项多中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Jen-Kai Fang, Hsin-Chih Yeh, Hsiang-Ying Lee, Han-Yu Weng, Ta-Yao Tai, Chao-Yuan Huang, Jian-Hua Hong, Chih-Chin Yu, Shu-Yu Wu, Shiu-Dong Chung, Chung-You Tsai, Thomas Y Hsueh, Allen W Chiu, Yuan-Hong Jiang, Yu Khun, Lee, I-Hsuan Alan Chen, Jen-Tai Lin, Yung-Tai Chen, Chang-Min Lin, Ian-Seng Cheong, Hsu-Che Huang, Shih-Hsiu Lo, Wei-Yu Lin, Jen-Shu Tseng, Chia-Chang Wu, Shian-Shiang Wang, Yi-Huei Chang, Chao-Hsiang Chang","doi":"10.1186/s12894-024-01622-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision is the standard treatment for high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The role of minimally invasive surgery in treating locally advanced UTUC remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgeries for managing locally advanced UTUC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 705 patients with locally advanced UTUC from multiple institutions throughout Taiwan. Perioperative outcomes and oncological outcomes, such as cancer-specific survival, overall survival, disease-free survival and bladder-free survival, were compared between the open, laparoscopic and robotic groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The minimally invasive group had better overall and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates. The 2-year CSS rates of the open, laparoscopic and robotic groups were 71%, 83%, and 77% respectively (p < 0.001). The robotic group had similar outcomes to the laparoscopic group. (p = 0.061, 0.825, 0.341 for OS, CSS, DFS respectively.) More lymph node dissections were performed and more lymph nodes were harvested in the robotic group (p = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results demonstrated that minimally invasive surgery, including laparoscopic and robotic surgery, for locally advanced UTUC resulted in oncological outcomes that are non-inferior to those of open surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":"24 1","pages":"231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of laparoscopic, robotic and open nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision in patients with T3T4 upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-center retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Jen-Kai Fang, Hsin-Chih Yeh, Hsiang-Ying Lee, Han-Yu Weng, Ta-Yao Tai, Chao-Yuan Huang, Jian-Hua Hong, Chih-Chin Yu, Shu-Yu Wu, Shiu-Dong Chung, Chung-You Tsai, Thomas Y Hsueh, Allen W Chiu, Yuan-Hong Jiang, Yu Khun, Lee, I-Hsuan Alan Chen, Jen-Tai Lin, Yung-Tai Chen, Chang-Min Lin, Ian-Seng Cheong, Hsu-Che Huang, Shih-Hsiu Lo, Wei-Yu Lin, Jen-Shu Tseng, Chia-Chang Wu, Shian-Shiang Wang, Yi-Huei Chang, Chao-Hsiang Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12894-024-01622-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision is the standard treatment for high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The role of minimally invasive surgery in treating locally advanced UTUC remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgeries for managing locally advanced UTUC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 705 patients with locally advanced UTUC from multiple institutions throughout Taiwan. Perioperative outcomes and oncological outcomes, such as cancer-specific survival, overall survival, disease-free survival and bladder-free survival, were compared between the open, laparoscopic and robotic groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The minimally invasive group had better overall and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates. The 2-year CSS rates of the open, laparoscopic and robotic groups were 71%, 83%, and 77% respectively (p < 0.001). The robotic group had similar outcomes to the laparoscopic group. (p = 0.061, 0.825, 0.341 for OS, CSS, DFS respectively.) More lymph node dissections were performed and more lymph nodes were harvested in the robotic group (p = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results demonstrated that minimally invasive surgery, including laparoscopic and robotic surgery, for locally advanced UTUC resulted in oncological outcomes that are non-inferior to those of open surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Urology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492713/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01622-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01622-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肾切除加膀胱袖带切除术是高危上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)的标准治疗方法。微创手术在治疗局部晚期UTUC中的作用仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较开腹手术、腹腔镜手术和机器人手术治疗局部晚期UTUC的效果:我们回顾性研究了来自台湾多家医疗机构的705例局部晚期UTUC患者。比较了开腹组、腹腔镜组和机器人组的围手术期结果和肿瘤学结果,如癌症特异性生存率、总生存率、无病生存率和无膀胱生存率:结果:微创组的总生存率和癌症特异性生存率(CSS)更高。开腹组、腹腔镜组和机器人组的2年CSS率分别为71%、83%和77%(P 结论:我们的研究结果表明,微创手术是治疗膀胱癌的最佳方法:我们的研究结果表明,微创手术(包括腹腔镜手术和机器人手术)治疗局部晚期UTUC的肿瘤效果并不亚于开腹手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of laparoscopic, robotic and open nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision in patients with T3T4 upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-center retrospective study.

Background: Nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision is the standard treatment for high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The role of minimally invasive surgery in treating locally advanced UTUC remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgeries for managing locally advanced UTUC.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 705 patients with locally advanced UTUC from multiple institutions throughout Taiwan. Perioperative outcomes and oncological outcomes, such as cancer-specific survival, overall survival, disease-free survival and bladder-free survival, were compared between the open, laparoscopic and robotic groups.

Results: The minimally invasive group had better overall and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates. The 2-year CSS rates of the open, laparoscopic and robotic groups were 71%, 83%, and 77% respectively (p < 0.001). The robotic group had similar outcomes to the laparoscopic group. (p = 0.061, 0.825, 0.341 for OS, CSS, DFS respectively.) More lymph node dissections were performed and more lymph nodes were harvested in the robotic group (p = 0.009).

Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that minimally invasive surgery, including laparoscopic and robotic surgery, for locally advanced UTUC resulted in oncological outcomes that are non-inferior to those of open surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Urology
BMC Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology: Endourology and technology Epidemiology and health outcomes Pediatric urology Pre-clinical and basic research Reconstructive urology Sexual function and fertility Urological imaging Urological oncology Voiding dysfunction Case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信