通过手机三维成像估算身体成分:对美国陆军单点法的评估。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Christine M Florez, Christian Rodriguez, Madelin R Siedler, Ethan Tinoco, Grant M Tinsley
{"title":"通过手机三维成像估算身体成分:对美国陆军单点法的评估。","authors":"Christine M Florez, Christian Rodriguez, Madelin R Siedler, Ethan Tinoco, Grant M Tinsley","doi":"10.1017/S0007114524002216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Within the USA military, monitoring body composition is an essential component of predicting physical performance and establishing soldier readiness. The purpose of this study was to explore mobile phone three-dimensional optical imaging (3DO), a user-friendly technology capable of rapidly obtaining reliable anthropometric measurements and to determine the validity of the new Army one-site body fat equations using 3DO-derived abdominal circumference. Ninety-six participants (51 F, 45 M; age: 23·7 ± 6·5 years; BMI: 24·7 ± 4·1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were assessed using 3DO, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and a 4-compartment model (4C). The validity of the Army equations using 3DO abdominal circumference was compared with 4C and DXA estimates. Compared with the 4C model, the Army equation overestimated BF% and fat mass (FM) by 1·3 ± 4·8 % and 0·9 ± 3·4 kg, respectively, while fat-free mass (FFM) was underestimated by 0·9 ± 3·4 kg (<i>P</i> < 0·01 for each). Values from DXA and Army equation were similar for BF%, FM and FFM (constant errors between -0·1 and 0·1 units; <i>P</i> ≥ 0·82 for each). In both comparisons, notable proportional bias was observed with slope coefficients of -0·08 to -0·43. Additionally, limits of agreement were 9·5-10·2 % for BF% and 6·8-7·8 kg for FM and FFM. Overall, while group-level performance of the one-site Army equation was acceptable, it exhibited notable proportional bias when compared with laboratory criterion methods and wide limits of agreement, indicating potential concerns when applied to individuals. 3DO may provide opportunities for the development of more advanced, automated digital anthropometric body fat estimation in military settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9257,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Body composition estimation from mobile phone three-dimensional imaging: evaluation of the USA army one-site method.\",\"authors\":\"Christine M Florez, Christian Rodriguez, Madelin R Siedler, Ethan Tinoco, Grant M Tinsley\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0007114524002216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Within the USA military, monitoring body composition is an essential component of predicting physical performance and establishing soldier readiness. The purpose of this study was to explore mobile phone three-dimensional optical imaging (3DO), a user-friendly technology capable of rapidly obtaining reliable anthropometric measurements and to determine the validity of the new Army one-site body fat equations using 3DO-derived abdominal circumference. Ninety-six participants (51 F, 45 M; age: 23·7 ± 6·5 years; BMI: 24·7 ± 4·1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were assessed using 3DO, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and a 4-compartment model (4C). The validity of the Army equations using 3DO abdominal circumference was compared with 4C and DXA estimates. Compared with the 4C model, the Army equation overestimated BF% and fat mass (FM) by 1·3 ± 4·8 % and 0·9 ± 3·4 kg, respectively, while fat-free mass (FFM) was underestimated by 0·9 ± 3·4 kg (<i>P</i> < 0·01 for each). Values from DXA and Army equation were similar for BF%, FM and FFM (constant errors between -0·1 and 0·1 units; <i>P</i> ≥ 0·82 for each). In both comparisons, notable proportional bias was observed with slope coefficients of -0·08 to -0·43. Additionally, limits of agreement were 9·5-10·2 % for BF% and 6·8-7·8 kg for FM and FFM. Overall, while group-level performance of the one-site Army equation was acceptable, it exhibited notable proportional bias when compared with laboratory criterion methods and wide limits of agreement, indicating potential concerns when applied to individuals. 3DO may provide opportunities for the development of more advanced, automated digital anthropometric body fat estimation in military settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Nutrition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114524002216\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114524002216","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国军队中,监测身体成分是预测身体表现和建立士兵战备状态的重要组成部分。本研究旨在探索手机三维光学成像(3DO)这一用户友好型技术,该技术能够快速获得可靠的人体测量数据,并利用 3DO 导出的腹围确定新的陆军单点体脂方程的有效性。研究人员使用 3DO、双能 X 射线吸收仪 (DXA) 和四室模型 (4C) 对 96 名参与者(51 名女性,45 名男性;年龄:23-7 ± 6-5 岁;体重指数:24-7 ± 4-1 kg/m2)进行了评估。将使用 3DO 腹围的陆军方程的有效性与 4C 和 DXA 估计值进行了比较。与 4C 模型相比,陆军方程高估了 BF% 和脂肪量 (FM) 分别为 1-3 ± 4-8 % 和 0-9 ± 3-4 kg,而低估了无脂肪量 (FFM) 0-9 ± 3-4 kg(P < 0-01)。DXA和陆军方程得出的BF%、FM和FFM值相似(恒定误差在-0-1和0-1个单位之间;P≥0-82)。在两次比较中,都观察到了明显的比例偏差,斜率系数为-0-08 至-0-43。此外,BF% 的一致性极限为 9-5-10-2%,FM 和 FFM 的一致性极限为 6-8-7-8kg。总的来说,虽然单点陆军方程的群体水平性能是可以接受的,但与实验室标准方法相比,它表现出明显的比例偏差和较大的一致性限制,这表明在应用于个体时可能存在问题。3DO 可为在军事环境中开发更先进的自动化数字人体脂肪测量提供机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Body composition estimation from mobile phone three-dimensional imaging: evaluation of the USA army one-site method.

Within the USA military, monitoring body composition is an essential component of predicting physical performance and establishing soldier readiness. The purpose of this study was to explore mobile phone three-dimensional optical imaging (3DO), a user-friendly technology capable of rapidly obtaining reliable anthropometric measurements and to determine the validity of the new Army one-site body fat equations using 3DO-derived abdominal circumference. Ninety-six participants (51 F, 45 M; age: 23·7 ± 6·5 years; BMI: 24·7 ± 4·1 kg/m2) were assessed using 3DO, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and a 4-compartment model (4C). The validity of the Army equations using 3DO abdominal circumference was compared with 4C and DXA estimates. Compared with the 4C model, the Army equation overestimated BF% and fat mass (FM) by 1·3 ± 4·8 % and 0·9 ± 3·4 kg, respectively, while fat-free mass (FFM) was underestimated by 0·9 ± 3·4 kg (P < 0·01 for each). Values from DXA and Army equation were similar for BF%, FM and FFM (constant errors between -0·1 and 0·1 units; P ≥ 0·82 for each). In both comparisons, notable proportional bias was observed with slope coefficients of -0·08 to -0·43. Additionally, limits of agreement were 9·5-10·2 % for BF% and 6·8-7·8 kg for FM and FFM. Overall, while group-level performance of the one-site Army equation was acceptable, it exhibited notable proportional bias when compared with laboratory criterion methods and wide limits of agreement, indicating potential concerns when applied to individuals. 3DO may provide opportunities for the development of more advanced, automated digital anthropometric body fat estimation in military settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Nutrition
British Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
740
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: British Journal of Nutrition is a leading international peer-reviewed journal covering research on human and clinical nutrition, animal nutrition and basic science as applied to nutrition. The Journal recognises the multidisciplinary nature of nutritional science and includes material from all of the specialities involved in nutrition research, including molecular and cell biology and nutritional genomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信