比较支链 DNA 和逆转录酶定量聚合酶链反应方法对脂质纳米颗粒封装的 mRNA 进行定量。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Bioanalysis Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1080/17576180.2024.2411914
Syed Ali, Matt Bruno, Caleb Celestin, Pratibha Chauhan, Marissa Mitola, Shilpa Sharma, Chiaowen Joyce Hsiao, Mengying Li, Lei Ci, Douglas Burdette, Harkewal Singh
{"title":"比较支链 DNA 和逆转录酶定量聚合酶链反应方法对脂质纳米颗粒封装的 mRNA 进行定量。","authors":"Syed Ali, Matt Bruno, Caleb Celestin, Pratibha Chauhan, Marissa Mitola, Shilpa Sharma, Chiaowen Joyce Hsiao, Mengying Li, Lei Ci, Douglas Burdette, Harkewal Singh","doi":"10.1080/17576180.2024.2411914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Messenger RNA (mRNA)-based therapeutics have emerged as a promising modality for various clinical applications, necessitating robust methods for mRNA quantification. This biodistribution study compares the performance of branched DNA and reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assays for measuring lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNA. Following intravenous administration of nascent peptide imaging luciferase mRNA (1 mg/kg) to rats, mRNA levels in various tissues and serum were quantified using both assays. Statistical analyses, including Bland-Altman, Deming regression and Passing-Bablok regression, were employed to assess method comparability and reproducibility. The results indicated that mRNA pharmacokinetics measured by branched DNA and RT-qPCR were largely consistent across tissues, with RT-qPCR showing greater reproducibility across multiple laboratories. RT-qPCR also demonstrated a wider dynamic range and higher sensitivity, making it a more versatile option for large-scale studies. Despite some differences in data due to tissue types and timepoints, both methods provided comparable pharmacokinetic profiles for mRNA quantification. This study underscores the importance of selecting an appropriate quantification method based on study requirements and highlights RT-qPCR's adaptability for multisite research, especially for the clinical development of mRNA-based therapeutics.</p>","PeriodicalId":8797,"journal":{"name":"Bioanalysis","volume":" ","pages":"1141-1154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of branched DNA and reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction methodologies for quantitation of lipid nanoparticle encapsulated mRNA.\",\"authors\":\"Syed Ali, Matt Bruno, Caleb Celestin, Pratibha Chauhan, Marissa Mitola, Shilpa Sharma, Chiaowen Joyce Hsiao, Mengying Li, Lei Ci, Douglas Burdette, Harkewal Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17576180.2024.2411914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Messenger RNA (mRNA)-based therapeutics have emerged as a promising modality for various clinical applications, necessitating robust methods for mRNA quantification. This biodistribution study compares the performance of branched DNA and reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assays for measuring lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNA. Following intravenous administration of nascent peptide imaging luciferase mRNA (1 mg/kg) to rats, mRNA levels in various tissues and serum were quantified using both assays. Statistical analyses, including Bland-Altman, Deming regression and Passing-Bablok regression, were employed to assess method comparability and reproducibility. The results indicated that mRNA pharmacokinetics measured by branched DNA and RT-qPCR were largely consistent across tissues, with RT-qPCR showing greater reproducibility across multiple laboratories. RT-qPCR also demonstrated a wider dynamic range and higher sensitivity, making it a more versatile option for large-scale studies. Despite some differences in data due to tissue types and timepoints, both methods provided comparable pharmacokinetic profiles for mRNA quantification. This study underscores the importance of selecting an appropriate quantification method based on study requirements and highlights RT-qPCR's adaptability for multisite research, especially for the clinical development of mRNA-based therapeutics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioanalysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1141-1154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583626/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2024.2411914\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2024.2411914","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以信使 RNA (mRNA) 为基础的疗法已成为各种临床应用的一种很有前途的方式,这就需要有可靠的 mRNA 定量方法。这项生物分布研究比较了支链 DNA 和逆转录酶定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)测定法在测量脂质纳米颗粒封装的 mRNA 方面的性能。给大鼠静脉注射新生肽成像荧光素酶 mRNA(1 毫克/千克)后,使用这两种测定法对各种组织和血清中的 mRNA 水平进行量化。统计分析包括布兰德-阿尔特曼、戴明回归和帕森-巴勃洛克回归,以评估方法的可比性和重现性。结果表明,通过支链 DNA 和 RT-qPCR 测定的 mRNA 药代动力学在不同组织中基本一致,而 RT-qPCR 在多个实验室中显示出更高的重现性。RT-qPCR 还显示出更宽的动态范围和更高的灵敏度,使其成为大规模研究的更多功能选择。尽管由于组织类型和时间点的不同,数据存在一些差异,但两种方法都能提供可比的 mRNA 定量药代动力学曲线。这项研究强调了根据研究要求选择合适的定量方法的重要性,并突出了 RT-qPCR 对多点研究的适应性,尤其是对基于 mRNA 的疗法的临床开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of branched DNA and reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction methodologies for quantitation of lipid nanoparticle encapsulated mRNA.

Messenger RNA (mRNA)-based therapeutics have emerged as a promising modality for various clinical applications, necessitating robust methods for mRNA quantification. This biodistribution study compares the performance of branched DNA and reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assays for measuring lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNA. Following intravenous administration of nascent peptide imaging luciferase mRNA (1 mg/kg) to rats, mRNA levels in various tissues and serum were quantified using both assays. Statistical analyses, including Bland-Altman, Deming regression and Passing-Bablok regression, were employed to assess method comparability and reproducibility. The results indicated that mRNA pharmacokinetics measured by branched DNA and RT-qPCR were largely consistent across tissues, with RT-qPCR showing greater reproducibility across multiple laboratories. RT-qPCR also demonstrated a wider dynamic range and higher sensitivity, making it a more versatile option for large-scale studies. Despite some differences in data due to tissue types and timepoints, both methods provided comparable pharmacokinetic profiles for mRNA quantification. This study underscores the importance of selecting an appropriate quantification method based on study requirements and highlights RT-qPCR's adaptability for multisite research, especially for the clinical development of mRNA-based therapeutics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioanalysis
Bioanalysis BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Reliable data obtained from selective, sensitive and reproducible analysis of xenobiotics and biotics in biological samples is a fundamental and crucial part of every successful drug development program. The same principles can also apply to many other areas of research such as forensic science, toxicology and sports doping testing. The bioanalytical field incorporates sophisticated techniques linking sample preparation and advanced separations with MS and NMR detection systems, automation and robotics. Standards set by regulatory bodies regarding method development and validation increasingly define the boundaries between speed and quality. Bioanalysis is a progressive discipline for which the future holds many exciting opportunities to further reduce sample volumes, analysis cost and environmental impact, as well as to improve sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, efficiency, assay throughput, data quality, data handling and processing. The journal Bioanalysis focuses on the techniques and methods used for the detection or quantitative study of analytes in human or animal biological samples. Bioanalysis encourages the submission of articles describing forward-looking applications, including biosensors, microfluidics, miniaturized analytical devices, and new hyphenated and multi-dimensional techniques. Bioanalysis delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for the modern bioanalyst.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信