一项前瞻性随机试验,比较含局部麻醉剂的温度反应凝胶与局部麻醉剂输注泵装置对减肥手术后疼痛控制的疗效。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Mira Yoo, Du-Yeong Hwang, Guan Hong Min, Heeyoung Lee, So Hyun Kang, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Yun-Suhk Suh, Young Suk Park
{"title":"一项前瞻性随机试验,比较含局部麻醉剂的温度反应凝胶与局部麻醉剂输注泵装置对减肥手术后疼痛控制的疗效。","authors":"Mira Yoo, Du-Yeong Hwang, Guan Hong Min, Heeyoung Lee, So Hyun Kang, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Yun-Suhk Suh, Young Suk Park","doi":"10.4174/astr.2024.107.4.229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Bariatric surgery is the gold standard for the treatment of morbid obesity, but postoperative pain impedes recovery. Currently available pain-recovery treatments have patient safety concerns. This led to a noninferiority study of Welpass (Genewel Co., Ltd.) <i>vs.</i> On-Q PainBuster (B. Braun), each used alongside a traditional method of continuous local anesthetic administration, in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center prospective randomized clinical trial, patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the treatment group (Welpass) and the control group (On-Q PainBuster), with ketorolac administered as needed after surgery according to the protocol. To assess efficacy, the total amount of ketorolac used up to 72 hours postoperatively was measured. Additionally, ketorolac usage and numerical rating scales (NRS) were recorded at 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours after operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total amounts of ketorolac used in the 72 hours postoperatively were 188.0 ± 84.6 mg in the treatment group and 198.7 ± 50.0 mg in the control group. The efficacy of the treatment group was noninferior to that of the control group, since the lower limit (-29.9 mg) of the confidence interval for the difference with the control group was greater than the prespecified noninferiority margin (-35.0 mg). Furthermore, when the NRS was evaluated after bariatric surgery, there was no significant difference in scores between the 2 groups at each time point (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found no difference in effect on pain between the 2 groups, supporting the use of Welpass in clinical practice for pain management in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8071,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11473320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prospective randomized trial comparing the efficacy of temperature-responsive gel with local anesthetics <i>versus</i> local anesthetic infusion pump device for postoperative pain control after bariatric surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Mira Yoo, Du-Yeong Hwang, Guan Hong Min, Heeyoung Lee, So Hyun Kang, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Yun-Suhk Suh, Young Suk Park\",\"doi\":\"10.4174/astr.2024.107.4.229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Bariatric surgery is the gold standard for the treatment of morbid obesity, but postoperative pain impedes recovery. Currently available pain-recovery treatments have patient safety concerns. This led to a noninferiority study of Welpass (Genewel Co., Ltd.) <i>vs.</i> On-Q PainBuster (B. Braun), each used alongside a traditional method of continuous local anesthetic administration, in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center prospective randomized clinical trial, patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the treatment group (Welpass) and the control group (On-Q PainBuster), with ketorolac administered as needed after surgery according to the protocol. To assess efficacy, the total amount of ketorolac used up to 72 hours postoperatively was measured. Additionally, ketorolac usage and numerical rating scales (NRS) were recorded at 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours after operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total amounts of ketorolac used in the 72 hours postoperatively were 188.0 ± 84.6 mg in the treatment group and 198.7 ± 50.0 mg in the control group. The efficacy of the treatment group was noninferior to that of the control group, since the lower limit (-29.9 mg) of the confidence interval for the difference with the control group was greater than the prespecified noninferiority margin (-35.0 mg). Furthermore, when the NRS was evaluated after bariatric surgery, there was no significant difference in scores between the 2 groups at each time point (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found no difference in effect on pain between the 2 groups, supporting the use of Welpass in clinical practice for pain management in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11473320/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2024.107.4.229\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2024.107.4.229","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:减肥手术是治疗病态肥胖症的金标准,但术后疼痛阻碍了患者的康复。目前可用的疼痛恢复疗法存在患者安全问题。因此,我们对 Welpass(Genewel 有限公司)与 On-Q PainBuster(B.Braun)进行了一项非劣效性研究:在这项单中心前瞻性随机临床试验中,患者按 1:1 的比例被分配到治疗组(Welpass)和对照组(On-Q PainBuster),术后根据方案按需使用酮咯酸。为评估疗效,对术后 72 小时内的酮咯酸使用总量进行了测量。此外,还记录了术后 6、24、48 和 72 小时的酮咯酸用量和数字评分量表(NRS):结果:术后 72 小时内,治疗组和对照组的酮咯酸用量分别为 188.0 ± 84.6 毫克和 198.7 ± 50.0 毫克。治疗组的疗效不劣于对照组,因为治疗组与对照组差异的置信区间下限(-29.9 毫克)大于预设的非劣效区间(-35.0 毫克)。此外,在减肥手术后对 NRS 进行评估时,两组在每个时间点的评分均无显著差异(P > 0.05):结论:我们发现两组对疼痛的影响没有差异,因此支持在临床实践中使用韦尔帕斯治疗减肥手术患者的疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A prospective randomized trial comparing the efficacy of temperature-responsive gel with local anesthetics versus local anesthetic infusion pump device for postoperative pain control after bariatric surgery.

Purpose: Bariatric surgery is the gold standard for the treatment of morbid obesity, but postoperative pain impedes recovery. Currently available pain-recovery treatments have patient safety concerns. This led to a noninferiority study of Welpass (Genewel Co., Ltd.) vs. On-Q PainBuster (B. Braun), each used alongside a traditional method of continuous local anesthetic administration, in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

Methods: In this single-center prospective randomized clinical trial, patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the treatment group (Welpass) and the control group (On-Q PainBuster), with ketorolac administered as needed after surgery according to the protocol. To assess efficacy, the total amount of ketorolac used up to 72 hours postoperatively was measured. Additionally, ketorolac usage and numerical rating scales (NRS) were recorded at 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours after operation.

Results: The total amounts of ketorolac used in the 72 hours postoperatively were 188.0 ± 84.6 mg in the treatment group and 198.7 ± 50.0 mg in the control group. The efficacy of the treatment group was noninferior to that of the control group, since the lower limit (-29.9 mg) of the confidence interval for the difference with the control group was greater than the prespecified noninferiority margin (-35.0 mg). Furthermore, when the NRS was evaluated after bariatric surgery, there was no significant difference in scores between the 2 groups at each time point (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: We found no difference in effect on pain between the 2 groups, supporting the use of Welpass in clinical practice for pain management in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Manuscripts to the Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research (Ann Surg Treat Res) should be written in English according to the instructions for authors. If the details are not described below, the style should follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publications available at International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) website (http://www.icmje.org).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信