Mathieu Capdevila, Audrey De Jong, Fouad Belafia, Aurelie Vonarb, Julie Carr, Nicolas Molinari, Olivier Choquet, Xavier Capdevila, Samir Jaber
{"title":"在超声波引导下对重症患者进行经皮膈神经刺激:一种评估膈肌功能的新方法。","authors":"Mathieu Capdevila, Audrey De Jong, Fouad Belafia, Aurelie Vonarb, Julie Carr, Nicolas Molinari, Olivier Choquet, Xavier Capdevila, Samir Jaber","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diaphragm dysfunction is common in intensive care unit and associated with weaning failure and mortality. Diagnosis gold standard is the transdiaphragmatic or tracheal pressure induced by magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation. However, the equipment is not commonly available and requires specific technical skills. We aimed to evaluate ultrasound guided transcutaneous phrenic nerve stimulation for daily bedside assessment of diaphragm function by targeted electrical phrenic nerve stimulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized cross-over study we compared a new method of ultrasound guided transcutaneous electrical phrenic nerve stimulation (SONOTEPS method) using a peripheral nerve stimulator, with the magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation. Intensive care unit adult patients under mechanical ventilation with a Richmond-Agitation-Sedation-Scale score of -4 or -5 were included. Each patient received the two methods of stimulation, in a randomized order. The primary outcome was the tracheal pressure (Ptrach) induced by stimulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 232 measures of Ptrach from 116 patients of whom 77 presented a diaphragm dysfunction (Ptrach < 11 cmH2O) and 50 a severe diaphragm dysfunction (Ptrach < 8 cmH2O). The Passing-Bablok regression showed no significant differences (intercept A of -0.03 [CI95:-0.83-0.52] and slope B of 0.98 [CI95:0.90-1.05]) between SONOTEPS method and magnetic stimulation which were positively correlated (R²=0.639). The mean bias was -1.08 (CI95 5.02, -7.18) cmH2O. The receiver operating curves showed an excellent performance for the diagnosis of diaphragm dysfunction and severe diaphragm dysfunction with respectively an area under curve of 0.90 (CI95 0.83-0.97) and 0.88 (CI95 0.82-0.95). This performance was not significantly affected by the body mass index or the presence of a neck catheter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SONOTEPS method is a simple and accurate tool for bedside assessment of diaphragm function with ultrasound guided transcutaneous phrenic nerve stimulation in sedated patients with no or minimal spontaneous respiratory activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound guided transcutaneous phrenic nerve stimulation in critically ill patients: a new method to evaluate diaphragmatic function.\",\"authors\":\"Mathieu Capdevila, Audrey De Jong, Fouad Belafia, Aurelie Vonarb, Julie Carr, Nicolas Molinari, Olivier Choquet, Xavier Capdevila, Samir Jaber\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diaphragm dysfunction is common in intensive care unit and associated with weaning failure and mortality. Diagnosis gold standard is the transdiaphragmatic or tracheal pressure induced by magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation. However, the equipment is not commonly available and requires specific technical skills. We aimed to evaluate ultrasound guided transcutaneous phrenic nerve stimulation for daily bedside assessment of diaphragm function by targeted electrical phrenic nerve stimulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized cross-over study we compared a new method of ultrasound guided transcutaneous electrical phrenic nerve stimulation (SONOTEPS method) using a peripheral nerve stimulator, with the magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation. Intensive care unit adult patients under mechanical ventilation with a Richmond-Agitation-Sedation-Scale score of -4 or -5 were included. Each patient received the two methods of stimulation, in a randomized order. The primary outcome was the tracheal pressure (Ptrach) induced by stimulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 232 measures of Ptrach from 116 patients of whom 77 presented a diaphragm dysfunction (Ptrach < 11 cmH2O) and 50 a severe diaphragm dysfunction (Ptrach < 8 cmH2O). The Passing-Bablok regression showed no significant differences (intercept A of -0.03 [CI95:-0.83-0.52] and slope B of 0.98 [CI95:0.90-1.05]) between SONOTEPS method and magnetic stimulation which were positively correlated (R²=0.639). The mean bias was -1.08 (CI95 5.02, -7.18) cmH2O. The receiver operating curves showed an excellent performance for the diagnosis of diaphragm dysfunction and severe diaphragm dysfunction with respectively an area under curve of 0.90 (CI95 0.83-0.97) and 0.88 (CI95 0.82-0.95). This performance was not significantly affected by the body mass index or the presence of a neck catheter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SONOTEPS method is a simple and accurate tool for bedside assessment of diaphragm function with ultrasound guided transcutaneous phrenic nerve stimulation in sedated patients with no or minimal spontaneous respiratory activity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005267\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005267","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ultrasound guided transcutaneous phrenic nerve stimulation in critically ill patients: a new method to evaluate diaphragmatic function.
Background: Diaphragm dysfunction is common in intensive care unit and associated with weaning failure and mortality. Diagnosis gold standard is the transdiaphragmatic or tracheal pressure induced by magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation. However, the equipment is not commonly available and requires specific technical skills. We aimed to evaluate ultrasound guided transcutaneous phrenic nerve stimulation for daily bedside assessment of diaphragm function by targeted electrical phrenic nerve stimulation.
Methods: In this randomized cross-over study we compared a new method of ultrasound guided transcutaneous electrical phrenic nerve stimulation (SONOTEPS method) using a peripheral nerve stimulator, with the magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation. Intensive care unit adult patients under mechanical ventilation with a Richmond-Agitation-Sedation-Scale score of -4 or -5 were included. Each patient received the two methods of stimulation, in a randomized order. The primary outcome was the tracheal pressure (Ptrach) induced by stimulation.
Results: We analyzed 232 measures of Ptrach from 116 patients of whom 77 presented a diaphragm dysfunction (Ptrach < 11 cmH2O) and 50 a severe diaphragm dysfunction (Ptrach < 8 cmH2O). The Passing-Bablok regression showed no significant differences (intercept A of -0.03 [CI95:-0.83-0.52] and slope B of 0.98 [CI95:0.90-1.05]) between SONOTEPS method and magnetic stimulation which were positively correlated (R²=0.639). The mean bias was -1.08 (CI95 5.02, -7.18) cmH2O. The receiver operating curves showed an excellent performance for the diagnosis of diaphragm dysfunction and severe diaphragm dysfunction with respectively an area under curve of 0.90 (CI95 0.83-0.97) and 0.88 (CI95 0.82-0.95). This performance was not significantly affected by the body mass index or the presence of a neck catheter.
Conclusions: The SONOTEPS method is a simple and accurate tool for bedside assessment of diaphragm function with ultrasound guided transcutaneous phrenic nerve stimulation in sedated patients with no or minimal spontaneous respiratory activity.
期刊介绍:
With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.