{"title":"干旱介导了泥炭藓对食草动物的防御反应。","authors":"Yong-Da Chen, Zhao-Jun Bu, Meng Wang, Ming-Ming Zhang, Jin-Ze Ma, Hong-Bo Guo","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.16427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Premise: </strong>The expected concomitant increase in multiple stressors such as herbivory and drought may threaten peatland ecosystems. How Sphagnum, the ecological engineers of peatlands, responds to combined stressors remains largely unexplored. Here we aimed to clarify resource allocations in Sphagnum during concomitant herbivory and drought.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>S. magellanicum and S. fuscum were exposed to drought and herbivory together or separately in laboratory experiments and analyzed for growth (biomass production and net photosynthetic rate), defense (phenolics in leachates and phenolics in extraction) and nonstructural carbohydrates (soluble sugar and starch) in relation to untreated controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Herbivory and drought had significant interactive effects on Sphagnum growth and defense. In both species, drought without herbivory reduced the phenolics in leachate, but with herbivory increased phenolics, indicating a synergistic effect between herbivory and drought on Sphagnum defense. Both stressors significantly decreased biomass production, with the combined stress having a more negative effect. Interestingly, a growth-defense trade-off was found in the drought treatment of both Sphagnum species, but disappeared in the wet treatment. Conversely, a trade-off between soluble sugars and phenolics was found in the wet but not in the drought treatment, suggesting that soluble sugars may play a role in inducing the defense and hence mask the growth-defense trade-off in peat mosses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results emphasize that predicting the impact of combined stressors on peat moss traits is complex and challenging. Future models should account for the effects of multiple environmental stressors to guide peatland conservation under climate warming.</p>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drought mediates Sphagnum defense response to herbivory.\",\"authors\":\"Yong-Da Chen, Zhao-Jun Bu, Meng Wang, Ming-Ming Zhang, Jin-Ze Ma, Hong-Bo Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajb2.16427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Premise: </strong>The expected concomitant increase in multiple stressors such as herbivory and drought may threaten peatland ecosystems. How Sphagnum, the ecological engineers of peatlands, responds to combined stressors remains largely unexplored. Here we aimed to clarify resource allocations in Sphagnum during concomitant herbivory and drought.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>S. magellanicum and S. fuscum were exposed to drought and herbivory together or separately in laboratory experiments and analyzed for growth (biomass production and net photosynthetic rate), defense (phenolics in leachates and phenolics in extraction) and nonstructural carbohydrates (soluble sugar and starch) in relation to untreated controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Herbivory and drought had significant interactive effects on Sphagnum growth and defense. In both species, drought without herbivory reduced the phenolics in leachate, but with herbivory increased phenolics, indicating a synergistic effect between herbivory and drought on Sphagnum defense. Both stressors significantly decreased biomass production, with the combined stress having a more negative effect. Interestingly, a growth-defense trade-off was found in the drought treatment of both Sphagnum species, but disappeared in the wet treatment. Conversely, a trade-off between soluble sugars and phenolics was found in the wet but not in the drought treatment, suggesting that soluble sugars may play a role in inducing the defense and hence mask the growth-defense trade-off in peat mosses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results emphasize that predicting the impact of combined stressors on peat moss traits is complex and challenging. Future models should account for the effects of multiple environmental stressors to guide peatland conservation under climate warming.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Botany\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Botany\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.16427\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.16427","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
前提:预计草食动物和干旱等多种压力因素会同时增加,这可能会威胁泥炭地生态系统。泥炭地的生态工程师--泥炭藓(Sphagnum)如何应对综合压力因素,在很大程度上仍未得到研究。在此,我们旨在阐明泥炭藓在同时遭受草食性和干旱时的资源分配情况:方法:在实验室实验中,将 S. magellanicum 和 S. fuscum 同时或分别置于干旱和草食性环境中,并分析其生长(生物量生产和净光合速率)、防御(浸出物中的酚类物质和提取物中的酚类物质)和非结构性碳水化合物(可溶性糖和淀粉)与未经处理的对照组的关系:草食性和干旱对泥炭藓的生长和防御有显著的交互影响。在这两个物种中,没有食草动物危害的干旱会减少浸出液中的酚类物质,但食草动物危害会增加酚类物质,这表明食草动物危害和干旱对泥炭藓的防御有协同作用。这两种胁迫都会大大降低生物量的产生,而综合胁迫的负面影响更大。有趣的是,在干旱处理中,两种泥炭藓都出现了生长-防御权衡现象,但在潮湿处理中却消失了。相反,在潮湿处理中发现了可溶性糖和酚类物质之间的权衡,而在干旱处理中却没有发现,这表明可溶性糖可能在诱导泥炭藓的防御中发挥作用,从而掩盖了泥炭藓的生长-防御权衡:我们的研究结果表明,预测综合胁迫因素对泥炭藓性状的影响既复杂又具有挑战性。未来的模型应考虑多种环境压力因素的影响,以指导气候变暖条件下的泥炭地保护工作。
Drought mediates Sphagnum defense response to herbivory.
Premise: The expected concomitant increase in multiple stressors such as herbivory and drought may threaten peatland ecosystems. How Sphagnum, the ecological engineers of peatlands, responds to combined stressors remains largely unexplored. Here we aimed to clarify resource allocations in Sphagnum during concomitant herbivory and drought.
Methods: S. magellanicum and S. fuscum were exposed to drought and herbivory together or separately in laboratory experiments and analyzed for growth (biomass production and net photosynthetic rate), defense (phenolics in leachates and phenolics in extraction) and nonstructural carbohydrates (soluble sugar and starch) in relation to untreated controls.
Results: Herbivory and drought had significant interactive effects on Sphagnum growth and defense. In both species, drought without herbivory reduced the phenolics in leachate, but with herbivory increased phenolics, indicating a synergistic effect between herbivory and drought on Sphagnum defense. Both stressors significantly decreased biomass production, with the combined stress having a more negative effect. Interestingly, a growth-defense trade-off was found in the drought treatment of both Sphagnum species, but disappeared in the wet treatment. Conversely, a trade-off between soluble sugars and phenolics was found in the wet but not in the drought treatment, suggesting that soluble sugars may play a role in inducing the defense and hence mask the growth-defense trade-off in peat mosses.
Conclusions: Our results emphasize that predicting the impact of combined stressors on peat moss traits is complex and challenging. Future models should account for the effects of multiple environmental stressors to guide peatland conservation under climate warming.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.