晚期慢性肾脏病患者的家庭强化降压治疗。

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Elaine Ku, Timothy P Copeland, Charles E McCulloch, Divya Seth, Christopher A Carlos, Kerry Cho, Anna Malkina, Lowell J Lo, Raymond K Hsu
{"title":"晚期慢性肾脏病患者的家庭强化降压治疗。","authors":"Elaine Ku, Timothy P Copeland, Charles E McCulloch, Divya Seth, Christopher A Carlos, Kerry Cho, Anna Malkina, Lowell J Lo, Raymond K Hsu","doi":"10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale & objective: </strong>Optimal blood pressure (BP) targets in advanced CKD are controversial. More intensive BP lowering in the setting of advanced CKD is thought to be associated with risk of acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, and ESKD. We aimed to conduct a pilot trial of intensive BP control to determine if lower SBP targets can be safely achieved for patients with CKD through titration of BP medications using in-home measured BP.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Non-blinded randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Settings & participants: </strong>108 patients with advanced CKD (eGFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) and hypertension.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were randomized either to a target home SBP goal of <120 mmHg (N=66) or a less intensive SBP goal (N=42). Antihypertensive medications were titrated to achieve the target home SBP range in the first 4 months of the study and maintained until the end of the study. Home BP was measured using a wireless Bluetooth-enabled monitor that transmitted readings to providers in real-time.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>The primary efficacy outcome was the difference in achieved clinic SBP between the two study arms from months 4-12. Safety outcomes included hyperkalemia, a composite outcome of falls or syncope, and onset of need for dialysis or kidney transplantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean clinic SBP at month 12 was 124.7 mmHg in the intensive SBP group vs. 138.2 mmHg in the less intensive SBP group. Averaged over months 4-12, the achieved mean clinic SBP in the intensive SBP arm was 11.7 mmHg (95% CI 7.5 to 16 mmHg, p<0.001) lower than the mean SBP achieved in the less intensive SBP arm. Primary safety outcomes were not statistically significantly different between the two arms (all p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Small sample size which may limit our ability to detect clinically significant differences in rates of adverse outcomes; single-center design.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A clinic SBP goal of <120 mmHg is feasible to achieve with the help of real-time home BP monitoring and appears to be safe in this study population with advanced CKD. Larger trials to determine optimal BP targets in advanced CKD and the risks and benefits associated with more intensive BP control are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7419,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intensive Home Blood Pressure Lowering in Patients with Advanced CKD.\",\"authors\":\"Elaine Ku, Timothy P Copeland, Charles E McCulloch, Divya Seth, Christopher A Carlos, Kerry Cho, Anna Malkina, Lowell J Lo, Raymond K Hsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.08.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale & objective: </strong>Optimal blood pressure (BP) targets in advanced CKD are controversial. More intensive BP lowering in the setting of advanced CKD is thought to be associated with risk of acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, and ESKD. We aimed to conduct a pilot trial of intensive BP control to determine if lower SBP targets can be safely achieved for patients with CKD through titration of BP medications using in-home measured BP.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Non-blinded randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Settings & participants: </strong>108 patients with advanced CKD (eGFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) and hypertension.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were randomized either to a target home SBP goal of <120 mmHg (N=66) or a less intensive SBP goal (N=42). Antihypertensive medications were titrated to achieve the target home SBP range in the first 4 months of the study and maintained until the end of the study. Home BP was measured using a wireless Bluetooth-enabled monitor that transmitted readings to providers in real-time.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>The primary efficacy outcome was the difference in achieved clinic SBP between the two study arms from months 4-12. Safety outcomes included hyperkalemia, a composite outcome of falls or syncope, and onset of need for dialysis or kidney transplantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean clinic SBP at month 12 was 124.7 mmHg in the intensive SBP group vs. 138.2 mmHg in the less intensive SBP group. Averaged over months 4-12, the achieved mean clinic SBP in the intensive SBP arm was 11.7 mmHg (95% CI 7.5 to 16 mmHg, p<0.001) lower than the mean SBP achieved in the less intensive SBP arm. Primary safety outcomes were not statistically significantly different between the two arms (all p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Small sample size which may limit our ability to detect clinically significant differences in rates of adverse outcomes; single-center design.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A clinic SBP goal of <120 mmHg is feasible to achieve with the help of real-time home BP monitoring and appears to be safe in this study population with advanced CKD. Larger trials to determine optimal BP targets in advanced CKD and the risks and benefits associated with more intensive BP control are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Kidney Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Kidney Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.08.010\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.08.010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由和目标:晚期慢性肾脏病患者的最佳血压 (BP) 目标尚存争议。晚期慢性肾脏病患者更密集地降低血压被认为与急性肾损伤、高钾血症和 ESKD 的风险有关。我们旨在开展一项强化血压控制试点试验,以确定是否可以通过使用居家测量血压滴定降压药物,安全地为慢性肾脏病患者实现较低的 SBP 目标:非盲法随机对照试验:108 名晚期 CKD(eGFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2)和高血压患者:干预措施:参与者被随机分配到一个目标家庭SBP结果:主要疗效结果为两个研究组在第 4-12 个月达到的临床 SBP 差异。安全性结果包括高钾血症、跌倒或晕厥的综合结果以及开始需要透析或肾移植:结果:第 12 个月时,强化 SBP 组的平均临床 SBP 为 124.7 mmHg,而非强化 SBP 组为 138.2 mmHg。平均到第 4-12 个月,强化 SBP 组达到的平均临床 SBP 为 11.7 mmHg(95% CI 7.5 至 16 mmHg,P0.05):局限性:样本量较小,可能会限制我们检测不良后果发生率的临床显著差异的能力;单中心设计:临床 SBP 目标为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intensive Home Blood Pressure Lowering in Patients with Advanced CKD.

Rationale & objective: Optimal blood pressure (BP) targets in advanced CKD are controversial. More intensive BP lowering in the setting of advanced CKD is thought to be associated with risk of acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, and ESKD. We aimed to conduct a pilot trial of intensive BP control to determine if lower SBP targets can be safely achieved for patients with CKD through titration of BP medications using in-home measured BP.

Study design: Non-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Settings & participants: 108 patients with advanced CKD (eGFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and hypertension.

Interventions: Participants were randomized either to a target home SBP goal of <120 mmHg (N=66) or a less intensive SBP goal (N=42). Antihypertensive medications were titrated to achieve the target home SBP range in the first 4 months of the study and maintained until the end of the study. Home BP was measured using a wireless Bluetooth-enabled monitor that transmitted readings to providers in real-time.

Outcomes: The primary efficacy outcome was the difference in achieved clinic SBP between the two study arms from months 4-12. Safety outcomes included hyperkalemia, a composite outcome of falls or syncope, and onset of need for dialysis or kidney transplantation.

Results: The mean clinic SBP at month 12 was 124.7 mmHg in the intensive SBP group vs. 138.2 mmHg in the less intensive SBP group. Averaged over months 4-12, the achieved mean clinic SBP in the intensive SBP arm was 11.7 mmHg (95% CI 7.5 to 16 mmHg, p<0.001) lower than the mean SBP achieved in the less intensive SBP arm. Primary safety outcomes were not statistically significantly different between the two arms (all p>0.05).

Limitations: Small sample size which may limit our ability to detect clinically significant differences in rates of adverse outcomes; single-center design.

Conclusions: A clinic SBP goal of <120 mmHg is feasible to achieve with the help of real-time home BP monitoring and appears to be safe in this study population with advanced CKD. Larger trials to determine optimal BP targets in advanced CKD and the risks and benefits associated with more intensive BP control are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
American Journal of Kidney Diseases 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
732
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Kidney Diseases (AJKD), the National Kidney Foundation's official journal, is globally recognized for its leadership in clinical nephrology content. Monthly, AJKD publishes original investigations on kidney diseases, hypertension, dialysis therapies, and kidney transplantation. Rigorous peer-review, statistical scrutiny, and a structured format characterize the publication process. Each issue includes case reports unveiling new diseases and potential therapeutic strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信