从投入角度评估美国 Cross Timbers 地区生态系统服务提供的技术效率。

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Andres Susaeta, Brian Sancewich, Hsu Kyaw, Iryna McDonald, Omkar Joshi
{"title":"从投入角度评估美国 Cross Timbers 地区生态系统服务提供的技术效率。","authors":"Andres Susaeta, Brian Sancewich, Hsu Kyaw, Iryna McDonald, Omkar Joshi","doi":"10.1007/s00267-024-02070-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We modeled the efficiency of ecosystem service provision-specifically timber production, carbon sequestration, and water yield-in the Cross Timbers region of the United States using stochastic frontier analysis from an input perspective. Inputs considered included natural capital and control variables such as temperature, precipitation, soil moisture, and natural disturbances, among others, that impact ecosystem service production. Inefficiency was modeled as a function of factors such as ownership, forest productivity, and natural disturbances. We utilized forest plot-level data obtained from the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program between 2008 and 2019. Our results indicated that ecosystem service production increased with higher levels of natural capital, higher temperatures, mesic soils, the presence of oaks, and damage caused by abiotic factors. We found evidence of technical inefficiency in the simultaneous provision of ecosystem services. From an input perspective, our findings revealed that, on average, 15.9% more input is used due to technical inefficiency in the Cross Timbers region. Specifically, private ownership and damage caused by abiotic factors resulted in excess input use of 16.4% and 14.3%, respectively, due to technical inefficiency. Managing the encroachment of invasive species like eastern redcedar can enhance ecosystem service production in the region, despite the high implementation costs. Collaboration among multidisciplinary extension professionals can help create comprehensive land management plans for the Cross Timbers, while landowners can also utilize cost-share programs to lower management expenses.</p>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Technical Inefficiency in Ecosystem Service Provision from an Input Perspective in the Cross Timbers region, United States.\",\"authors\":\"Andres Susaeta, Brian Sancewich, Hsu Kyaw, Iryna McDonald, Omkar Joshi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00267-024-02070-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We modeled the efficiency of ecosystem service provision-specifically timber production, carbon sequestration, and water yield-in the Cross Timbers region of the United States using stochastic frontier analysis from an input perspective. Inputs considered included natural capital and control variables such as temperature, precipitation, soil moisture, and natural disturbances, among others, that impact ecosystem service production. Inefficiency was modeled as a function of factors such as ownership, forest productivity, and natural disturbances. We utilized forest plot-level data obtained from the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program between 2008 and 2019. Our results indicated that ecosystem service production increased with higher levels of natural capital, higher temperatures, mesic soils, the presence of oaks, and damage caused by abiotic factors. We found evidence of technical inefficiency in the simultaneous provision of ecosystem services. From an input perspective, our findings revealed that, on average, 15.9% more input is used due to technical inefficiency in the Cross Timbers region. Specifically, private ownership and damage caused by abiotic factors resulted in excess input use of 16.4% and 14.3%, respectively, due to technical inefficiency. Managing the encroachment of invasive species like eastern redcedar can enhance ecosystem service production in the region, despite the high implementation costs. Collaboration among multidisciplinary extension professionals can help create comprehensive land management plans for the Cross Timbers, while landowners can also utilize cost-share programs to lower management expenses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-02070-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-02070-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们采用随机前沿分析法,从投入的角度对美国 Cross Timbers 地区的生态系统服务提供效率(特别是木材生产、碳固存和水产量)进行了建模。考虑的投入包括自然资本和控制变量,如温度、降水、土壤湿度和自然干扰等,这些都会影响生态系统服务的生产。无效率模型是所有权、森林生产力和自然干扰等因素的函数。我们利用了 2008 年至 2019 年期间从森林资源清查与分析 (FIA) 计划中获得的森林地块级数据。我们的研究结果表明,生态系统服务生产随着自然资本水平的提高、气温升高、中性土壤、橡树的存在以及非生物因素的破坏而增加。我们发现了同时提供生态系统服务时技术效率低下的证据。从投入的角度来看,我们的研究结果表明,由于技术效率低下,克罗斯-蒂姆伯斯地区平均多使用了 15.9% 的投入。具体而言,由于技术效率低下,私人所有权和非生物因素造成的破坏分别导致了 16.4% 和 14.3% 的超额投入使用。尽管实施成本较高,但管理东部红杉等入侵物种的侵蚀可提高该地区的生态系统服务产量。多学科推广专业人员之间的合作有助于为 Cross Timbers 制定全面的土地管理计划,而土地所有者也可以利用成本分担计划来降低管理成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Technical Inefficiency in Ecosystem Service Provision from an Input Perspective in the Cross Timbers region, United States.

We modeled the efficiency of ecosystem service provision-specifically timber production, carbon sequestration, and water yield-in the Cross Timbers region of the United States using stochastic frontier analysis from an input perspective. Inputs considered included natural capital and control variables such as temperature, precipitation, soil moisture, and natural disturbances, among others, that impact ecosystem service production. Inefficiency was modeled as a function of factors such as ownership, forest productivity, and natural disturbances. We utilized forest plot-level data obtained from the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program between 2008 and 2019. Our results indicated that ecosystem service production increased with higher levels of natural capital, higher temperatures, mesic soils, the presence of oaks, and damage caused by abiotic factors. We found evidence of technical inefficiency in the simultaneous provision of ecosystem services. From an input perspective, our findings revealed that, on average, 15.9% more input is used due to technical inefficiency in the Cross Timbers region. Specifically, private ownership and damage caused by abiotic factors resulted in excess input use of 16.4% and 14.3%, respectively, due to technical inefficiency. Managing the encroachment of invasive species like eastern redcedar can enhance ecosystem service production in the region, despite the high implementation costs. Collaboration among multidisciplinary extension professionals can help create comprehensive land management plans for the Cross Timbers, while landowners can also utilize cost-share programs to lower management expenses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信