树冠覆盖越少的地方,城市种植的降温效果越好?大陆跨城市比较

IF 8.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2024-12-10 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176864
Jia Wang, Weiqi Zhou, Haoxin Li, Linli Xu, Honghong Wang
{"title":"树冠覆盖越少的地方,城市种植的降温效果越好?大陆跨城市比较","authors":"Jia Wang, Weiqi Zhou, Haoxin Li, Linli Xu, Honghong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Numerous studies have shown that the cooling efficiency (CE) of urban trees varies by cities with different climate backgrounds, and recent research further indicated that there may be large within-city variations in CE. However, how such within-city variations differ across cities, and their relations to the local percent of urban tree canopy (Ptree) remain poorly understood. This study aims to fill this gap based on a comparison study across 118 cities with different biomes and climates in the continental USA. We used the tree canopy layer of the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD) 2011 to measure urban tree canopy (UTC), and calculated land surface temperature (LST) based on Landsat thermal bands. We found: 1) CE had larger within-city and cross-city spatial variations in cities located in arid and semi-arid biomes. 2) CE was related to Ptree in nonlinear ways in >90 % of the study cities. In most cities (approximately 70 %), CE had an L-shaped relationship with Ptree, showing that CE first declined quickly with the increase of Ptree, but then gradually dropped in a slower way or became relatively stable after Ptree reached a certain threshold. 3) While there was no significant difference in the types of CE-Ptree relationship among biomes and climates, the threshold of Ptree in CE-Ptree nonlinear ways was smaller in arid cities. The results of this threshold linking cooling benefits and current UTC can serve as a useful tool to prioritize locations for urban planting to maximize cooling benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":" ","pages":"176864"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cooling benefits from urban planting depend on local background canopy cover: A continental cross-city comparison.\",\"authors\":\"Jia Wang, Weiqi Zhou, Haoxin Li, Linli Xu, Honghong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Numerous studies have shown that the cooling efficiency (CE) of urban trees varies by cities with different climate backgrounds, and recent research further indicated that there may be large within-city variations in CE. However, how such within-city variations differ across cities, and their relations to the local percent of urban tree canopy (Ptree) remain poorly understood. This study aims to fill this gap based on a comparison study across 118 cities with different biomes and climates in the continental USA. We used the tree canopy layer of the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD) 2011 to measure urban tree canopy (UTC), and calculated land surface temperature (LST) based on Landsat thermal bands. We found: 1) CE had larger within-city and cross-city spatial variations in cities located in arid and semi-arid biomes. 2) CE was related to Ptree in nonlinear ways in >90 % of the study cities. In most cities (approximately 70 %), CE had an L-shaped relationship with Ptree, showing that CE first declined quickly with the increase of Ptree, but then gradually dropped in a slower way or became relatively stable after Ptree reached a certain threshold. 3) While there was no significant difference in the types of CE-Ptree relationship among biomes and climates, the threshold of Ptree in CE-Ptree nonlinear ways was smaller in arid cities. The results of this threshold linking cooling benefits and current UTC can serve as a useful tool to prioritize locations for urban planting to maximize cooling benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"176864\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176864\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176864","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大量研究表明,城市树木的冷却效率(CE)因不同气候背景的城市而异,最近的研究进一步表明,CE 在城市内部可能存在巨大差异。然而,人们对城市内部的这种差异以及它们与当地城市树冠(Ptree)比例的关系仍然知之甚少。本研究旨在通过对美国大陆不同生物群落和气候的 118 个城市进行比较研究,填补这一空白。我们使用 2011 年国家土地覆盖数据集(NLCD)的树冠层来测量城市树冠(UTC),并根据 Landsat 热波段计算地表温度(LST)。我们发现:1)在位于干旱和半干旱生物群落的城市中,CE 在城市内和城市间的空间变化较大。2)在超过 90% 的研究城市中,CE 与 Ptree 呈非线性关系。在大多数城市(约 70%),CE 与 Ptree 呈 "L "型关系,表明随着 Ptree 的增加,CE 先是快速下降,但在 Ptree 达到一定临界值后,CE 又以较慢的速度逐渐下降或变得相对稳定。3)虽然不同生物群落和气候条件下,CE-Ptree 的关系类型没有显著差异,但在干旱城市,CE-Ptree 非线性关系中的 Ptree 临界值较小。将降温效益与当前UTC联系起来的阈值结果可作为一种有用的工具,用于确定城市种植地点的优先次序,以最大限度地提高降温效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cooling benefits from urban planting depend on local background canopy cover: A continental cross-city comparison.

Numerous studies have shown that the cooling efficiency (CE) of urban trees varies by cities with different climate backgrounds, and recent research further indicated that there may be large within-city variations in CE. However, how such within-city variations differ across cities, and their relations to the local percent of urban tree canopy (Ptree) remain poorly understood. This study aims to fill this gap based on a comparison study across 118 cities with different biomes and climates in the continental USA. We used the tree canopy layer of the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD) 2011 to measure urban tree canopy (UTC), and calculated land surface temperature (LST) based on Landsat thermal bands. We found: 1) CE had larger within-city and cross-city spatial variations in cities located in arid and semi-arid biomes. 2) CE was related to Ptree in nonlinear ways in >90 % of the study cities. In most cities (approximately 70 %), CE had an L-shaped relationship with Ptree, showing that CE first declined quickly with the increase of Ptree, but then gradually dropped in a slower way or became relatively stable after Ptree reached a certain threshold. 3) While there was no significant difference in the types of CE-Ptree relationship among biomes and climates, the threshold of Ptree in CE-Ptree nonlinear ways was smaller in arid cities. The results of this threshold linking cooling benefits and current UTC can serve as a useful tool to prioritize locations for urban planting to maximize cooling benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信