丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍后的患者疗效:美国马萨诸塞州患者和处方者特征影响的回顾性分析。

IF 5.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Addiction Pub Date : 2024-10-13 DOI:10.1111/add.16684
Gary J Young, Tianjie Zhu, Md Mahmudul Hasan, Farbod Alinezhad, Leonard D Young, Md Noor-E-Alam
{"title":"丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍后的患者疗效:美国马萨诸塞州患者和处方者特征影响的回顾性分析。","authors":"Gary J Young, Tianjie Zhu, Md Mahmudul Hasan, Farbod Alinezhad, Leonard D Young, Md Noor-E-Alam","doi":"10.1111/add.16684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Opioid use disorder (OUD) is treatable with buprenorphine/naloxone (buprenorphine), but many patients discontinue treatment prematurely. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of patient- and prescriber-level characteristics relative to several patient outcomes following the initiation of buprenorphine treatment for OUD.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a retrospective observational investigation. We used the Public Health Data Warehouse from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health to construct a sample of patients who initiated buprenorphine treatment between 2015 and 2019. We attributed each patient to a prescriber based on information from prescription claims. We used multilevel models to assess the influence of patient- and prescriber-level characteristics on each outcome.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Massachusetts, USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study cohort comprised 37 955 unique patients and 2146 prescribers. Among patients, 64.6% were male, 52.6% were under the age of 35 and 82.2% were White, non-Hispanic. For insurance coverage, 72.1% had Medicaid.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The outcome measures were poor medication continuity, treatment discontinuation and opioid overdose, all assessed within a 12-month follow-up period that began with a focal prescription for buprenorphine. Each patient had a single follow-up period. Poor medication continuity was defined as medication gaps totaling more than 7 days during the initial 180 days of buprenorphine treatment and treatment discontinuation was defined as having a medication gap for 2 consecutive months within the 12-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The patient-level rates for poor medication continuity, treatment discontinuation and opioid overdose were 59.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 59.2-60.2], 57.4% (95% CI = 56.9-57.9) and 10.3% (95% CI = 10.0-10.6), respectively, with 1.1% (95% CI = 1.0-1.2) experiencing a fatal opioid overdose. At the patient level, after adjustment for covariates, adverse outcomes were associated with race/ethnicity as both Black, non-Hispanic and Hispanic patients had worse outcomes than did White, non-Hispanic patients (Black, non-Hispanic -- poor continuity: 1.50, 95% CI = 1.34-1.68; discontinuation: 1.44, 95% CI = 1.30-1.60; Hispanic -- poor continuity: 1.21, 95% CI = 1.12-1.31; discontinuation: 1.38, 95% CI = 1.28-1.48). Patients with insurance coverage through Medicaid also had worse outcomes than those with commercial insurance (poor continuity: 1.18, 95% CI = 1.11-1.26; discontinuation: 1.09, 95% CI = 1.03-1.16; overdose: 1.98, 95% CI = 1.75-2.23). Pre-treatment mental health conditions and other types of chronic illness were also associated with worse outcomes (History of mental health conditions -- poor continuity: 1.11, 95% CI = 1.06-1.17; discontinuation: 1.05, CI = 1.01-1.10; overdose: 1.47, 95% CI = 1.36-1.60; Chronic health conditions -- poor continuity: 1.15, 95% CI = 1.05-1.27; discontinuation: 1.15, 95% CI = 1.05-1.26; overdose: 1.83, 95% CI = 1.60-2.10; History of substance use disorder other than for opioids -- poor continuity: 1.54, 95% CI = 1.46-1.62; discontinuation: 1.54, 95% CI = 1.47-1.62; overdose: 1.93, 95% CI = 1.80-2.07). At the prescriber level, after adjustments for covariates, adverse outcomes were associated with clinical training, as primary care physicians had higher rates of adverse outcomes than psychiatrists (poor continuity: 1.12, 95% CI = 1.02-1.23; discontinuation: 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01-1.09). A larger prescriber panel size, based on number of patients being prescribed buprenorphine, was also associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes (poor continuity: 1.36, 95% CI = 1.27-1.46; discontinuation: 1.21, 95% CI = 1.14-1.28; overdose: 1.10, 95% CI = 1.01-1.19). Between 9% and 15% of the variation among patients for the outcomes was accounted for at the prescriber level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient- and prescriber-level characteristics appear to be associated with patient outcomes following buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder. In particular, patients' race/ethnicity and insurance coverage appear to be associated with substantial disparities in outcomes, and prescriber characteristics appear to be most closely associated with medication continuity during early treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient outcomes following buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder: A retrospective analysis of the influence of patient- and prescriber-level characteristics in Massachusetts, USA.\",\"authors\":\"Gary J Young, Tianjie Zhu, Md Mahmudul Hasan, Farbod Alinezhad, Leonard D Young, Md Noor-E-Alam\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/add.16684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Opioid use disorder (OUD) is treatable with buprenorphine/naloxone (buprenorphine), but many patients discontinue treatment prematurely. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of patient- and prescriber-level characteristics relative to several patient outcomes following the initiation of buprenorphine treatment for OUD.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a retrospective observational investigation. We used the Public Health Data Warehouse from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health to construct a sample of patients who initiated buprenorphine treatment between 2015 and 2019. We attributed each patient to a prescriber based on information from prescription claims. We used multilevel models to assess the influence of patient- and prescriber-level characteristics on each outcome.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Massachusetts, USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study cohort comprised 37 955 unique patients and 2146 prescribers. Among patients, 64.6% were male, 52.6% were under the age of 35 and 82.2% were White, non-Hispanic. For insurance coverage, 72.1% had Medicaid.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The outcome measures were poor medication continuity, treatment discontinuation and opioid overdose, all assessed within a 12-month follow-up period that began with a focal prescription for buprenorphine. Each patient had a single follow-up period. Poor medication continuity was defined as medication gaps totaling more than 7 days during the initial 180 days of buprenorphine treatment and treatment discontinuation was defined as having a medication gap for 2 consecutive months within the 12-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The patient-level rates for poor medication continuity, treatment discontinuation and opioid overdose were 59.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 59.2-60.2], 57.4% (95% CI = 56.9-57.9) and 10.3% (95% CI = 10.0-10.6), respectively, with 1.1% (95% CI = 1.0-1.2) experiencing a fatal opioid overdose. At the patient level, after adjustment for covariates, adverse outcomes were associated with race/ethnicity as both Black, non-Hispanic and Hispanic patients had worse outcomes than did White, non-Hispanic patients (Black, non-Hispanic -- poor continuity: 1.50, 95% CI = 1.34-1.68; discontinuation: 1.44, 95% CI = 1.30-1.60; Hispanic -- poor continuity: 1.21, 95% CI = 1.12-1.31; discontinuation: 1.38, 95% CI = 1.28-1.48). Patients with insurance coverage through Medicaid also had worse outcomes than those with commercial insurance (poor continuity: 1.18, 95% CI = 1.11-1.26; discontinuation: 1.09, 95% CI = 1.03-1.16; overdose: 1.98, 95% CI = 1.75-2.23). Pre-treatment mental health conditions and other types of chronic illness were also associated with worse outcomes (History of mental health conditions -- poor continuity: 1.11, 95% CI = 1.06-1.17; discontinuation: 1.05, CI = 1.01-1.10; overdose: 1.47, 95% CI = 1.36-1.60; Chronic health conditions -- poor continuity: 1.15, 95% CI = 1.05-1.27; discontinuation: 1.15, 95% CI = 1.05-1.26; overdose: 1.83, 95% CI = 1.60-2.10; History of substance use disorder other than for opioids -- poor continuity: 1.54, 95% CI = 1.46-1.62; discontinuation: 1.54, 95% CI = 1.47-1.62; overdose: 1.93, 95% CI = 1.80-2.07). At the prescriber level, after adjustments for covariates, adverse outcomes were associated with clinical training, as primary care physicians had higher rates of adverse outcomes than psychiatrists (poor continuity: 1.12, 95% CI = 1.02-1.23; discontinuation: 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01-1.09). A larger prescriber panel size, based on number of patients being prescribed buprenorphine, was also associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes (poor continuity: 1.36, 95% CI = 1.27-1.46; discontinuation: 1.21, 95% CI = 1.14-1.28; overdose: 1.10, 95% CI = 1.01-1.19). Between 9% and 15% of the variation among patients for the outcomes was accounted for at the prescriber level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient- and prescriber-level characteristics appear to be associated with patient outcomes following buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder. In particular, patients' race/ethnicity and insurance coverage appear to be associated with substantial disparities in outcomes, and prescriber characteristics appear to be most closely associated with medication continuity during early treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addiction\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addiction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16684\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16684","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮(丁丙诺啡)可治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD),但许多患者过早中断了治疗。本研究旨在评估患者和开药者的特征对开始使用丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物滥用症后患者治疗结果的影响:这是一项回顾性观察调查。我们使用马萨诸塞州公共卫生部的公共卫生数据仓库,建立了 2015 年至 2019 年间开始丁丙诺啡治疗的患者样本。我们根据处方报销单上的信息将每位患者归属于一位处方医生。我们使用多层次模型来评估患者和处方者层面的特征对每种结果的影响:美国马萨诸塞州:研究队列包括 37 955 名患者和 2146 名处方者。患者中 64.6% 为男性,52.6% 年龄在 35 岁以下,82.2% 为非西班牙裔白人。在保险覆盖范围方面,72.1%的患者享受医疗补助:结果测量指标为用药连续性差、治疗中断和阿片类药物过量,所有这些指标均在为期 12 个月的随访期内进行评估,随访期从开具丁丙诺啡重点处方开始。每位患者只有一次随访机会。用药连续性差的定义是,在丁丙诺啡治疗的最初 180 天内,用药间隔总计超过 7 天;治疗中断的定义是,在 12 个月的随访期内,用药间隔连续 2 个月:患者层面的用药连续性差、治疗中断和阿片类药物过量率分别为59.7% [95% 置信区间 (CI) = 59.2-60.2]、57.4% (95% CI = 56.9-57.9)和10.3% (95% CI = 10.0-10.6),其中1.1% (95% CI = 1.0-1.2)的患者出现致命的阿片类药物过量。在患者层面,在对协变量进行调整后,不良后果与种族/族裔有关,因为黑人、非西班牙裔和西班牙裔患者的不良后果均比白人、非西班牙裔患者更差(黑人、非西班牙裔--持续性差:1.50,95% CI = 1.34-1.68;中断:1.44,95% CI = 1.44):1.44,95% CI = 1.30-1.60;西班牙裔--连续性差:1.21,95% CI = 1.12-1.31;中断:1.38,95% CI = 1.28-1.48)。通过医疗补助计划投保的患者的治疗效果也比商业保险患者差(连续性差:1.18,95% CI = 1.11-1.26;中断:1.09,95% CI = 1.28-1.48):1.09,95% CI = 1.03-1.16;用药过量:1.98,95% CI = 1.75-2.23)。治疗前的精神健康状况和其他类型的慢性疾病也与较差的治疗结果有关(精神健康状况史--持续性差:1.11,95% CI = 1.06-1.17;中断:1.05,CI = 1.05):1.05,95% CI = 1.01-1.10;用药过量:1.47,95% CI = 1.36-1.60;慢性健康状况--持续性差:1.15,95% CI = 1.05-1.27;中断:1.15,95% CI = 1.05-1.26;用药过量:1.83,95% CI = 1.60-2.10;阿片类以外的药物使用障碍史--持续性差:1.54,95% CI = 1.46-1.62;中断:1.54,95% CI = 1.47-1.62;用药过量:1.93,95% CI = 1.80-2.07)。在处方者层面,在对协变量进行调整后,不良后果与临床培训有关,因为初级保健医生的不良后果发生率高于精神科医生(连续性差:1.12,95% CI = 1.02-1.23;停药:1.04,95% CI = 1.47-1.62;用药过量:1.93,95% CI = 1.80-2.07):1.04,95% CI = 1.01-1.09)。根据开丁丙诺啡处方的患者人数,处方者小组规模越大,不良后果发生率越高(连续性差:1.36,95% CI = 1.27-1.46;中断:1.21,95% CI = 1.01-1.09):1.21,95% CI = 1.14-1.28;用药过量:1.10,95% CI = 1.01-1.19)。在处方者层面,患者之间的结果差异占 9% 到 15%:结论:患者和处方者层面的特征似乎与患者接受丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍后的疗效有关。特别是,患者的种族/民族和保险范围似乎与治疗结果的巨大差异有关,而处方者的特征似乎与早期治疗期间的用药连续性关系最为密切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient outcomes following buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder: A retrospective analysis of the influence of patient- and prescriber-level characteristics in Massachusetts, USA.

Background and aims: Opioid use disorder (OUD) is treatable with buprenorphine/naloxone (buprenorphine), but many patients discontinue treatment prematurely. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of patient- and prescriber-level characteristics relative to several patient outcomes following the initiation of buprenorphine treatment for OUD.

Design: This was a retrospective observational investigation. We used the Public Health Data Warehouse from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health to construct a sample of patients who initiated buprenorphine treatment between 2015 and 2019. We attributed each patient to a prescriber based on information from prescription claims. We used multilevel models to assess the influence of patient- and prescriber-level characteristics on each outcome.

Setting: Massachusetts, USA.

Participants: The study cohort comprised 37 955 unique patients and 2146 prescribers. Among patients, 64.6% were male, 52.6% were under the age of 35 and 82.2% were White, non-Hispanic. For insurance coverage, 72.1% had Medicaid.

Measurements: The outcome measures were poor medication continuity, treatment discontinuation and opioid overdose, all assessed within a 12-month follow-up period that began with a focal prescription for buprenorphine. Each patient had a single follow-up period. Poor medication continuity was defined as medication gaps totaling more than 7 days during the initial 180 days of buprenorphine treatment and treatment discontinuation was defined as having a medication gap for 2 consecutive months within the 12-month follow-up period.

Findings: The patient-level rates for poor medication continuity, treatment discontinuation and opioid overdose were 59.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 59.2-60.2], 57.4% (95% CI = 56.9-57.9) and 10.3% (95% CI = 10.0-10.6), respectively, with 1.1% (95% CI = 1.0-1.2) experiencing a fatal opioid overdose. At the patient level, after adjustment for covariates, adverse outcomes were associated with race/ethnicity as both Black, non-Hispanic and Hispanic patients had worse outcomes than did White, non-Hispanic patients (Black, non-Hispanic -- poor continuity: 1.50, 95% CI = 1.34-1.68; discontinuation: 1.44, 95% CI = 1.30-1.60; Hispanic -- poor continuity: 1.21, 95% CI = 1.12-1.31; discontinuation: 1.38, 95% CI = 1.28-1.48). Patients with insurance coverage through Medicaid also had worse outcomes than those with commercial insurance (poor continuity: 1.18, 95% CI = 1.11-1.26; discontinuation: 1.09, 95% CI = 1.03-1.16; overdose: 1.98, 95% CI = 1.75-2.23). Pre-treatment mental health conditions and other types of chronic illness were also associated with worse outcomes (History of mental health conditions -- poor continuity: 1.11, 95% CI = 1.06-1.17; discontinuation: 1.05, CI = 1.01-1.10; overdose: 1.47, 95% CI = 1.36-1.60; Chronic health conditions -- poor continuity: 1.15, 95% CI = 1.05-1.27; discontinuation: 1.15, 95% CI = 1.05-1.26; overdose: 1.83, 95% CI = 1.60-2.10; History of substance use disorder other than for opioids -- poor continuity: 1.54, 95% CI = 1.46-1.62; discontinuation: 1.54, 95% CI = 1.47-1.62; overdose: 1.93, 95% CI = 1.80-2.07). At the prescriber level, after adjustments for covariates, adverse outcomes were associated with clinical training, as primary care physicians had higher rates of adverse outcomes than psychiatrists (poor continuity: 1.12, 95% CI = 1.02-1.23; discontinuation: 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01-1.09). A larger prescriber panel size, based on number of patients being prescribed buprenorphine, was also associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes (poor continuity: 1.36, 95% CI = 1.27-1.46; discontinuation: 1.21, 95% CI = 1.14-1.28; overdose: 1.10, 95% CI = 1.01-1.19). Between 9% and 15% of the variation among patients for the outcomes was accounted for at the prescriber level.

Conclusions: Patient- and prescriber-level characteristics appear to be associated with patient outcomes following buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder. In particular, patients' race/ethnicity and insurance coverage appear to be associated with substantial disparities in outcomes, and prescriber characteristics appear to be most closely associated with medication continuity during early treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction
Addiction 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines. Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries. Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信