氧化锌防晒剂的防晒系数:与体内防晒系数相比,体外防晒系数太低--简要回顾。

IF 2.7 3区 化学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1007/s43630-024-00644-0
Uli Osterwalder, Jean-Claude Hubaud, Eva Perroux-David, Thibault Moraine, Jeroen van den Bosch
{"title":"氧化锌防晒剂的防晒系数:与体内防晒系数相比,体外防晒系数太低--简要回顾。","authors":"Uli Osterwalder, Jean-Claude Hubaud, Eva Perroux-David, Thibault Moraine, Jeroen van den Bosch","doi":"10.1007/s43630-024-00644-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sunscreens are mainly characterized by their sun-protection factor (SPF), which is measured according to the in vivo gold standard ISO 24444. Although the SPF concept is simple, SPF values are difficult to measure, due to the rather high variability caused by the complex interaction of light and skin. For half a century, there have been attempts to correlate the costly and ethically controversial in vivo procedure with a non-invasive (in vitro) method. After decades of development, alternative non-invasive SPF methods are expected to become available as ISO standards in early 2025. In particular, sunscreen manufacturers who use zinc oxide (ZnO) in higher concentrations (conc.) (10-25%) in their formulations, are concerned that these new in vitro methods would not confirm the SPF-values on their labels that have been determined in vivo, according to ISO 24444. This brief review reveals that sunscreen formulations with high conc. of ZnO often yield SPF<sub>in vitro</sub> values that are lower than the SPF<sub>in vivo</sub> values. This can be explained by the fact that in vitro methods have been developed for conventional emulsions products with organic UV filters, but not for highly concentrated ZnO-alone sunscreens. Fortunately, there seems to be a fix for this problem. There is a difference in density between ordinary emulsions with organic filters (density of the residual oil phase ~ 1.0 g/ml) and highly concentrated ZnO-alone formulations (~ 1.3-1.7 g/ml). As the application of current standards is weight-based, this makes the film on the PMMA plate much thinner, which is likely to lead to lower SPF<sub>in vitro</sub> values. Preliminary experiments show that using the same volume on the PMMA plates instead of the same weight as organic UV filters gives a much better correlation between in vitro and in vivo SPF results. A recent evaluation of three samples of highly concentrated ZnO sunscreens by the Dutch NVWA seems to confirm these findings. Further experimental evidence is required to fully understand this phenomenon and to adapt the in vitro method for higher conc. ZnO formulations accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":98,"journal":{"name":"Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1999-2009"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sun-protection factor of zinc-oxide sunscreens: SPF<sub>in vitro</sub> too low compared to SPF<sub>in vivo</sub>-a brief review.\",\"authors\":\"Uli Osterwalder, Jean-Claude Hubaud, Eva Perroux-David, Thibault Moraine, Jeroen van den Bosch\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43630-024-00644-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sunscreens are mainly characterized by their sun-protection factor (SPF), which is measured according to the in vivo gold standard ISO 24444. Although the SPF concept is simple, SPF values are difficult to measure, due to the rather high variability caused by the complex interaction of light and skin. For half a century, there have been attempts to correlate the costly and ethically controversial in vivo procedure with a non-invasive (in vitro) method. After decades of development, alternative non-invasive SPF methods are expected to become available as ISO standards in early 2025. In particular, sunscreen manufacturers who use zinc oxide (ZnO) in higher concentrations (conc.) (10-25%) in their formulations, are concerned that these new in vitro methods would not confirm the SPF-values on their labels that have been determined in vivo, according to ISO 24444. This brief review reveals that sunscreen formulations with high conc. of ZnO often yield SPF<sub>in vitro</sub> values that are lower than the SPF<sub>in vivo</sub> values. This can be explained by the fact that in vitro methods have been developed for conventional emulsions products with organic UV filters, but not for highly concentrated ZnO-alone sunscreens. Fortunately, there seems to be a fix for this problem. There is a difference in density between ordinary emulsions with organic filters (density of the residual oil phase ~ 1.0 g/ml) and highly concentrated ZnO-alone formulations (~ 1.3-1.7 g/ml). As the application of current standards is weight-based, this makes the film on the PMMA plate much thinner, which is likely to lead to lower SPF<sub>in vitro</sub> values. Preliminary experiments show that using the same volume on the PMMA plates instead of the same weight as organic UV filters gives a much better correlation between in vitro and in vivo SPF results. A recent evaluation of three samples of highly concentrated ZnO sunscreens by the Dutch NVWA seems to confirm these findings. Further experimental evidence is required to fully understand this phenomenon and to adapt the in vitro method for higher conc. ZnO formulations accordingly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":98,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1999-2009\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-024-00644-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-024-00644-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

防晒霜的主要特征是防晒系数(SPF),它是根据 ISO 24444 体内黄金标准测量的。虽然 SPF 的概念很简单,但 SPF 值却很难测量,因为光和皮肤之间复杂的相互作用会导致很大的变化。半个世纪以来,人们一直在尝试用一种非侵入性(体外)方法将成本高昂且在道德上有争议的体内程序联系起来。经过几十年的发展,预计在 2025 年初,替代性非侵入式 SPF 方法将成为 ISO 标准。特别是那些在配方中使用较高浓度(10%-25%)氧化锌(ZnO)的防晒霜制造商,他们担心这些新的体外方法无法确认其标签上根据 ISO 24444 在体内测定的 SPF 值。这篇简短的综述揭示了含高浓度氧化锌的防晒配方所产生的 SPF 体外值往往低于 SPF 体内值。造成这种情况的原因是,体外检测方法是针对含有有机紫外线过滤剂的传统乳液产品开发的,而不是针对高浓度氧化锌单体防晒剂开发的。幸运的是,似乎有办法解决这个问题。含有机过滤剂的普通乳液(残留油相的密度约为 1.0 克/毫升)和高浓度氧化锌单体配方(约为 1.3-1.7 克/毫升)之间的密度存在差异。由于现行标准的应用是以重量为基础的,这使得 PMMA 板上的薄膜更薄,很可能导致较低的 SPF 体外值。初步实验表明,使用相同体积的 PMMA 板,而不是相同重量的有机紫外线过滤剂,可使体外和体内 SPF 结果之间的相关性大大提高。荷兰 NVWA 最近对三个高浓度氧化锌防晒霜样品进行的评估似乎证实了这些发现。要充分理解这一现象,并相应地调整用于高浓度氧化锌配方的体外方法,还需要更多的实验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sun-protection factor of zinc-oxide sunscreens: SPFin vitro too low compared to SPFin vivo-a brief review.

Sunscreens are mainly characterized by their sun-protection factor (SPF), which is measured according to the in vivo gold standard ISO 24444. Although the SPF concept is simple, SPF values are difficult to measure, due to the rather high variability caused by the complex interaction of light and skin. For half a century, there have been attempts to correlate the costly and ethically controversial in vivo procedure with a non-invasive (in vitro) method. After decades of development, alternative non-invasive SPF methods are expected to become available as ISO standards in early 2025. In particular, sunscreen manufacturers who use zinc oxide (ZnO) in higher concentrations (conc.) (10-25%) in their formulations, are concerned that these new in vitro methods would not confirm the SPF-values on their labels that have been determined in vivo, according to ISO 24444. This brief review reveals that sunscreen formulations with high conc. of ZnO often yield SPFin vitro values that are lower than the SPFin vivo values. This can be explained by the fact that in vitro methods have been developed for conventional emulsions products with organic UV filters, but not for highly concentrated ZnO-alone sunscreens. Fortunately, there seems to be a fix for this problem. There is a difference in density between ordinary emulsions with organic filters (density of the residual oil phase ~ 1.0 g/ml) and highly concentrated ZnO-alone formulations (~ 1.3-1.7 g/ml). As the application of current standards is weight-based, this makes the film on the PMMA plate much thinner, which is likely to lead to lower SPFin vitro values. Preliminary experiments show that using the same volume on the PMMA plates instead of the same weight as organic UV filters gives a much better correlation between in vitro and in vivo SPF results. A recent evaluation of three samples of highly concentrated ZnO sunscreens by the Dutch NVWA seems to confirm these findings. Further experimental evidence is required to fully understand this phenomenon and to adapt the in vitro method for higher conc. ZnO formulations accordingly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
201
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: A society-owned journal publishing high quality research on all aspects of photochemistry and photobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信