基于前瞻性连接组学的帕金森病深部脑刺激方案设计

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kevin Hines, Angela M. Noecker, Anneke M. Frankemolle‐Gilbert, Tsao‐Wei Liang, Jeffrey Ratliff, Melissa Heiry, Cameron C. McIntyre, Chengyuan Wu
{"title":"基于前瞻性连接组学的帕金森病深部脑刺激方案设计","authors":"Kevin Hines, Angela M. Noecker, Anneke M. Frankemolle‐Gilbert, Tsao‐Wei Liang, Jeffrey Ratliff, Melissa Heiry, Cameron C. McIntyre, Chengyuan Wu","doi":"10.1002/mds.30026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundEfficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) relies on accurate lead placement as well as optimization of the stimulation parameters. Although clinical software tools are now available, programming still largely relies on a monopolar review, a tedious process for both patients and programmers.ObjectiveThis study investigates the safety and feasibility of prospective automated connectomic DBS programming (automated connectomic programming [ACP]), focusing on the recruitment of specific white matter pathways.MethodsAfter DBS implantation, a detailed connectomic DBS model in patient‐specific space was developed for each study participant. A driving‐force model was used to quantify pathway recruitment across 2400 different DBS settings. Optimization algorithms maximized recruitment of therapeutic pathways while minimizing recruitment of side‐effect pathways. Thirteen subjects were enrolled in two study phases that compared DBS settings derived from ACP to standard clinical DBS settings.ResultsNine patients underwent reprogramming with ACP (5 globus pallidus interna [GPi], 4 subthalamic nucleus [STN]). Four patients underwent initial programming with ACP (3 GPi, 1 STN). All patients tolerated ACP without persistent side effects. In the reprogramming cohort, 3 patients preferred their ACP program, and 1 patient felt it was comparable to their clinical program. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part III, scores for the initial ACP cohort (3 GPi, 1 STN) improved by an average of 43.5% (40.4–52.6 ± 5.6%).ConclusionsACP appeared clinically safe and feasible. It provided reasonable motor improvement, which can be further optimized with subsequent clinical adjustment. Additional investigation is required to refine the optimization algorithm and to quantify the clinical benefit of ACP in a larger cohort. © 2024 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.","PeriodicalId":213,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective Connectomic‐Based Deep Brain Stimulation Programming for Parkinson's Disease\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Hines, Angela M. Noecker, Anneke M. Frankemolle‐Gilbert, Tsao‐Wei Liang, Jeffrey Ratliff, Melissa Heiry, Cameron C. McIntyre, Chengyuan Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mds.30026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundEfficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) relies on accurate lead placement as well as optimization of the stimulation parameters. Although clinical software tools are now available, programming still largely relies on a monopolar review, a tedious process for both patients and programmers.ObjectiveThis study investigates the safety and feasibility of prospective automated connectomic DBS programming (automated connectomic programming [ACP]), focusing on the recruitment of specific white matter pathways.MethodsAfter DBS implantation, a detailed connectomic DBS model in patient‐specific space was developed for each study participant. A driving‐force model was used to quantify pathway recruitment across 2400 different DBS settings. Optimization algorithms maximized recruitment of therapeutic pathways while minimizing recruitment of side‐effect pathways. Thirteen subjects were enrolled in two study phases that compared DBS settings derived from ACP to standard clinical DBS settings.ResultsNine patients underwent reprogramming with ACP (5 globus pallidus interna [GPi], 4 subthalamic nucleus [STN]). Four patients underwent initial programming with ACP (3 GPi, 1 STN). All patients tolerated ACP without persistent side effects. In the reprogramming cohort, 3 patients preferred their ACP program, and 1 patient felt it was comparable to their clinical program. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part III, scores for the initial ACP cohort (3 GPi, 1 STN) improved by an average of 43.5% (40.4–52.6 ± 5.6%).ConclusionsACP appeared clinically safe and feasible. It provided reasonable motor improvement, which can be further optimized with subsequent clinical adjustment. Additional investigation is required to refine the optimization algorithm and to quantify the clinical benefit of ACP in a larger cohort. © 2024 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Movement Disorders\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Movement Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.30026\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.30026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景脑深部刺激(DBS)的疗效有赖于准确的导联放置以及刺激参数的优化。本研究调查了前瞻性自动连接组学 DBS 编程(自动连接组学编程 [ACP])的安全性和可行性,重点关注特定白质通路的招募。方法在 DBS 植入后,为每位研究参与者开发了患者特定空间的详细连接组学 DBS 模型。驱动力模型用于量化 2400 种不同 DBS 设置的通路招募。优化算法使治疗通路的招募最大化,同时使副作用通路的招募最小化。13 名受试者参加了两个阶段的研究,比较了从 ACP 导出的 DBS 设置与标准临床 DBS 设置。四名患者接受了 ACP 初始编程(3 名 GPi,1 名 STN)。所有患者均能耐受 ACP,无持续副作用。在重新编程队列中,3 名患者更喜欢他们的 ACP 程序,1 名患者认为该程序与他们的临床程序相当。初始 ACP 队列(3 名 GPi,1 名 STN)的统一帕金森病评分量表第三部分评分平均提高了 43.5%(40.4-52.6 ± 5.6%)。它提供了合理的运动改善,可通过后续临床调整进一步优化。需要进行更多的研究来完善优化算法,并在更大的群体中量化 ACP 的临床益处。© 2024 国际帕金森和运动障碍协会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prospective Connectomic‐Based Deep Brain Stimulation Programming for Parkinson's Disease
BackgroundEfficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) relies on accurate lead placement as well as optimization of the stimulation parameters. Although clinical software tools are now available, programming still largely relies on a monopolar review, a tedious process for both patients and programmers.ObjectiveThis study investigates the safety and feasibility of prospective automated connectomic DBS programming (automated connectomic programming [ACP]), focusing on the recruitment of specific white matter pathways.MethodsAfter DBS implantation, a detailed connectomic DBS model in patient‐specific space was developed for each study participant. A driving‐force model was used to quantify pathway recruitment across 2400 different DBS settings. Optimization algorithms maximized recruitment of therapeutic pathways while minimizing recruitment of side‐effect pathways. Thirteen subjects were enrolled in two study phases that compared DBS settings derived from ACP to standard clinical DBS settings.ResultsNine patients underwent reprogramming with ACP (5 globus pallidus interna [GPi], 4 subthalamic nucleus [STN]). Four patients underwent initial programming with ACP (3 GPi, 1 STN). All patients tolerated ACP without persistent side effects. In the reprogramming cohort, 3 patients preferred their ACP program, and 1 patient felt it was comparable to their clinical program. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part III, scores for the initial ACP cohort (3 GPi, 1 STN) improved by an average of 43.5% (40.4–52.6 ± 5.6%).ConclusionsACP appeared clinically safe and feasible. It provided reasonable motor improvement, which can be further optimized with subsequent clinical adjustment. Additional investigation is required to refine the optimization algorithm and to quantify the clinical benefit of ACP in a larger cohort. © 2024 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Movement Disorders
Movement Disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
371
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders publishes a variety of content types including Reviews, Viewpoints, Full Length Articles, Historical Reports, Brief Reports, and Letters. The journal considers original manuscripts on topics related to the diagnosis, therapeutics, pharmacology, biochemistry, physiology, etiology, genetics, and epidemiology of movement disorders. Appropriate topics include Parkinsonism, Chorea, Tremors, Dystonia, Myoclonus, Tics, Tardive Dyskinesia, Spasticity, and Ataxia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信