Minggui Ou, Ke Hu, Min Li, Shijiang Liu, Xinchun Zhang, Xuemei Lu, Xingyu Zhan, Xun Liao, Ming Li, Rongyu Li
求助PDF
{"title":"根瘤菌对四种杀菌剂的抗药性风险评估","authors":"Minggui Ou, Ke Hu, Min Li, Shijiang Liu, Xinchun Zhang, Xuemei Lu, Xingyu Zhan, Xun Liao, Ming Li, Rongyu Li","doi":"10.1002/ps.8490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDHexaconazole, thifluzamide, difenoconazole and azoxystrobin are widely used fungicides for the control of <jats:italic>Rhizoctonia solani</jats:italic> in China. However, few studies have assessed the sensitivity and resistance risk of <jats:italic>R. solani</jats:italic> to these four fungicides.RESULTSThe sensitivities of 126 <jats:italic>R. solani</jats:italic> isolates to hexaconazole, thifluzamide, difenoconazole and azoxystrobin were determined, with average half maximal effective concentration (EC<jats:sub>50</jats:sub>) values of 0.0386, 0.0659, 0.663 and 1.508 μg mL<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, respectively. Field resistance monitoring of the four fungicides showed that the three isolates had moderate resistance to difenoconazole. Resistant mutants to the four fungicides were obtained by fungicide adaptation, and resistance could be stably inherited by most mutants. Compared with those of the parent isolates, the biological characteristics of hexaconazole‐resistant mutants exhibited enhanced or similar compound fitness index (CFI), whereas most of the other mutants displayed reduced or comparable CFI. There was evidence of positive cross‐resistance between hexaconazole and difenoconazole. In the presence of fungicides, the expression of the <jats:italic>CYP51</jats:italic> genes in hexaconazole‐ and difenoconazole‐resistant mutants significantly increased, the expression of <jats:italic>SDH</jats:italic> genes in thifluzamide‐resistant mutants significantly decreased, and the expression of the <jats:italic>Cyt b</jats:italic> gene in azoxystrobin‐resistant mutants did not significantly change.CONCLUSIONBased on these data, we speculated that <jats:italic>R. solani</jats:italic> had a low‐to‐medium resistance risk to four fungicides. The change of target gene expression may be one of the reasons for fungicide resistance in <jats:italic>R. solani</jats:italic>. This study provides a theoretical basis for monitoring resistance emergence and developing resistance management strategies to control <jats:italic>R. solani</jats:italic>. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.","PeriodicalId":218,"journal":{"name":"Pest Management Science","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resistance risk assessment of Rhizoctonia solani to four fungicides\",\"authors\":\"Minggui Ou, Ke Hu, Min Li, Shijiang Liu, Xinchun Zhang, Xuemei Lu, Xingyu Zhan, Xun Liao, Ming Li, Rongyu Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ps.8490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUNDHexaconazole, thifluzamide, difenoconazole and azoxystrobin are widely used fungicides for the control of <jats:italic>Rhizoctonia solani</jats:italic> in China. However, few studies have assessed the sensitivity and resistance risk of <jats:italic>R. solani</jats:italic> to these four fungicides.RESULTSThe sensitivities of 126 <jats:italic>R. solani</jats:italic> isolates to hexaconazole, thifluzamide, difenoconazole and azoxystrobin were determined, with average half maximal effective concentration (EC<jats:sub>50</jats:sub>) values of 0.0386, 0.0659, 0.663 and 1.508 μg mL<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, respectively. Field resistance monitoring of the four fungicides showed that the three isolates had moderate resistance to difenoconazole. Resistant mutants to the four fungicides were obtained by fungicide adaptation, and resistance could be stably inherited by most mutants. Compared with those of the parent isolates, the biological characteristics of hexaconazole‐resistant mutants exhibited enhanced or similar compound fitness index (CFI), whereas most of the other mutants displayed reduced or comparable CFI. There was evidence of positive cross‐resistance between hexaconazole and difenoconazole. In the presence of fungicides, the expression of the <jats:italic>CYP51</jats:italic> genes in hexaconazole‐ and difenoconazole‐resistant mutants significantly increased, the expression of <jats:italic>SDH</jats:italic> genes in thifluzamide‐resistant mutants significantly decreased, and the expression of the <jats:italic>Cyt b</jats:italic> gene in azoxystrobin‐resistant mutants did not significantly change.CONCLUSIONBased on these data, we speculated that <jats:italic>R. solani</jats:italic> had a low‐to‐medium resistance risk to four fungicides. The change of target gene expression may be one of the reasons for fungicide resistance in <jats:italic>R. solani</jats:italic>. This study provides a theoretical basis for monitoring resistance emergence and developing resistance management strategies to control <jats:italic>R. solani</jats:italic>. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pest Management Science\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pest Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.8490\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pest Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.8490","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Resistance risk assessment of Rhizoctonia solani to four fungicides
BACKGROUNDHexaconazole, thifluzamide, difenoconazole and azoxystrobin are widely used fungicides for the control of Rhizoctonia solani in China. However, few studies have assessed the sensitivity and resistance risk of R. solani to these four fungicides.RESULTSThe sensitivities of 126 R. solani isolates to hexaconazole, thifluzamide, difenoconazole and azoxystrobin were determined, with average half maximal effective concentration (EC50 ) values of 0.0386, 0.0659, 0.663 and 1.508 μg mL−1 , respectively. Field resistance monitoring of the four fungicides showed that the three isolates had moderate resistance to difenoconazole. Resistant mutants to the four fungicides were obtained by fungicide adaptation, and resistance could be stably inherited by most mutants. Compared with those of the parent isolates, the biological characteristics of hexaconazole‐resistant mutants exhibited enhanced or similar compound fitness index (CFI), whereas most of the other mutants displayed reduced or comparable CFI. There was evidence of positive cross‐resistance between hexaconazole and difenoconazole. In the presence of fungicides, the expression of the CYP51 genes in hexaconazole‐ and difenoconazole‐resistant mutants significantly increased, the expression of SDH genes in thifluzamide‐resistant mutants significantly decreased, and the expression of the Cyt b gene in azoxystrobin‐resistant mutants did not significantly change.CONCLUSIONBased on these data, we speculated that R. solani had a low‐to‐medium resistance risk to four fungicides. The change of target gene expression may be one of the reasons for fungicide resistance in R. solani . This study provides a theoretical basis for monitoring resistance emergence and developing resistance management strategies to control R. solani . © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.