2024 年转移性抗阉割前列腺癌的管理决策

IF 25.3 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
David J. VanderWeele, Maha Hussain
{"title":"2024 年转移性抗阉割前列腺癌的管理决策","authors":"David J. VanderWeele, Maha Hussain","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h2>Section snippets</h2><section><section><h2>One size does not fit all: the importance of biomarkers</h2>One of the themes from the review by Francini et al [1] that should be highlighted is the importance of biomarkers. Several new therapies are approved for biomarker-selected patients. When the right biomarker is present, patients have a better chance of deriving greater benefit from biomarker-directed therapy. In PROPEL, the hazard ratio (HR) for OS with addition of olaparib versus abiraterone alone for patients with a <em>BRCA1</em> or <em>BRCA2</em> alteration was 0.29 [2]. Many patients with tumors with high</section></section><section><section><h2>Benefit and toxicity of prior therapy</h2>Francini et al [1] lay out algorithms for treatment options on the basis of prior therapy received. In practice, when multiple treatment options exist, what is critical is not just what therapy was previously given but also how much benefit was received and what toxicities were endured. Eligibility criteria for the CARD trial included disease progression within 12 mo on a prior androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI), selecting for patients unlikely to receive a significant benefit from a</section></section><section><section><h2>Radiation and radioligand therapy in mCRPC</h2>ARPIs are relatively well tolerated and are thus ideal candidates for combination therapy. This is true for pharmacological therapy, with triplet therapy approved for metastatic HSPC and combination PARP inhibitor therapy approved for mCRPC. The ENZA-p trial showed that addition of adaptive-dosed <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA improved outcomes over enzalutamide alone [10]. Results from the phase 2 ARTO trial suggest that a similar strategy could be pursued with radiotherapy for patients with nonvisceral</section></section><section><section><h2>Patients’ wishes and shared decision-making</h2>Almost all patients value both quantity and quality of life, with individual patients putting more or less emphasis on each. Management decisions are made with collaboration between the patient and the treating physician. Knowledge of prior therapies and their benefit and toxicities and of molecular and clinical biomarkers can inform estimates of benefit from future therapies. Ultimately, a shared decision between the treating physician and the patient helps patients best accomplish their goals.</section></section>","PeriodicalId":12223,"journal":{"name":"European urology","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management Decisions for Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer in 2024\",\"authors\":\"David J. VanderWeele, Maha Hussain\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eururo.2024.10.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h2>Section snippets</h2><section><section><h2>One size does not fit all: the importance of biomarkers</h2>One of the themes from the review by Francini et al [1] that should be highlighted is the importance of biomarkers. Several new therapies are approved for biomarker-selected patients. When the right biomarker is present, patients have a better chance of deriving greater benefit from biomarker-directed therapy. In PROPEL, the hazard ratio (HR) for OS with addition of olaparib versus abiraterone alone for patients with a <em>BRCA1</em> or <em>BRCA2</em> alteration was 0.29 [2]. Many patients with tumors with high</section></section><section><section><h2>Benefit and toxicity of prior therapy</h2>Francini et al [1] lay out algorithms for treatment options on the basis of prior therapy received. In practice, when multiple treatment options exist, what is critical is not just what therapy was previously given but also how much benefit was received and what toxicities were endured. Eligibility criteria for the CARD trial included disease progression within 12 mo on a prior androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI), selecting for patients unlikely to receive a significant benefit from a</section></section><section><section><h2>Radiation and radioligand therapy in mCRPC</h2>ARPIs are relatively well tolerated and are thus ideal candidates for combination therapy. This is true for pharmacological therapy, with triplet therapy approved for metastatic HSPC and combination PARP inhibitor therapy approved for mCRPC. The ENZA-p trial showed that addition of adaptive-dosed <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA improved outcomes over enzalutamide alone [10]. Results from the phase 2 ARTO trial suggest that a similar strategy could be pursued with radiotherapy for patients with nonvisceral</section></section><section><section><h2>Patients’ wishes and shared decision-making</h2>Almost all patients value both quantity and quality of life, with individual patients putting more or less emphasis on each. Management decisions are made with collaboration between the patient and the treating physician. Knowledge of prior therapies and their benefit and toxicities and of molecular and clinical biomarkers can inform estimates of benefit from future therapies. Ultimately, a shared decision between the treating physician and the patient helps patients best accomplish their goals.</section></section>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":25.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2024.10.003\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2024.10.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

章节片段一刀切:生物标志物的重要性Francini等人[1]的综述中值得强调的一个主题是生物标志物的重要性。一些新疗法已被批准用于生物标志物选定的患者。如果有合适的生物标志物,患者就更有可能从生物标志物指导的治疗中获益。在 PROPEL 中,对于 BRCA1 或 BRCA2 改变的患者,加用奥拉帕利与单用阿比特龙相比,OS 的危险比(HR)为 0.29[2]。Francini等人[1]根据先前接受的治疗,为许多肿瘤患者制定了治疗方案的算法。在实践中,当存在多种治疗方案时,最关键的不仅是之前接受了什么治疗,还要看患者的获益程度和所承受的毒性。CARD 试验的资格标准包括既往接受过雄激素受体通路抑制剂 (ARPI) 治疗 12 个月内疾病进展,选择的患者不太可能从雄激素受体通路抑制剂 (ARPI) 疗法中获得显著疗效,而放疗和放射性配体疗法在 mCRPCARPIs 中的耐受性相对较好,因此是联合疗法的理想候选者。药物治疗也是如此,转移性 HSPC 的三联疗法和 mCRPC 的 PARP 抑制剂联合疗法均已获批。ENZA-p试验表明,与单独使用恩杂鲁胺相比,添加自适应剂量的177Lu-PSMA可改善疗效[10]。患者意愿和共同决策几乎所有患者都重视生活的数量和质量,不同患者对两者的重视程度也不尽相同。治疗决策由患者和主治医生共同做出。对既往疗法及其益处和毒性以及分子和临床生物标志物的了解可以为估计未来疗法的益处提供依据。最终,由主治医生和患者共同做出决定有助于患者以最佳方式实现自己的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management Decisions for Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer in 2024

Section snippets

One size does not fit all: the importance of biomarkers

One of the themes from the review by Francini et al [1] that should be highlighted is the importance of biomarkers. Several new therapies are approved for biomarker-selected patients. When the right biomarker is present, patients have a better chance of deriving greater benefit from biomarker-directed therapy. In PROPEL, the hazard ratio (HR) for OS with addition of olaparib versus abiraterone alone for patients with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 alteration was 0.29 [2]. Many patients with tumors with high

Benefit and toxicity of prior therapy

Francini et al [1] lay out algorithms for treatment options on the basis of prior therapy received. In practice, when multiple treatment options exist, what is critical is not just what therapy was previously given but also how much benefit was received and what toxicities were endured. Eligibility criteria for the CARD trial included disease progression within 12 mo on a prior androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI), selecting for patients unlikely to receive a significant benefit from a

Radiation and radioligand therapy in mCRPC

ARPIs are relatively well tolerated and are thus ideal candidates for combination therapy. This is true for pharmacological therapy, with triplet therapy approved for metastatic HSPC and combination PARP inhibitor therapy approved for mCRPC. The ENZA-p trial showed that addition of adaptive-dosed 177Lu-PSMA improved outcomes over enzalutamide alone [10]. Results from the phase 2 ARTO trial suggest that a similar strategy could be pursued with radiotherapy for patients with nonvisceral

Patients’ wishes and shared decision-making

Almost all patients value both quantity and quality of life, with individual patients putting more or less emphasis on each. Management decisions are made with collaboration between the patient and the treating physician. Knowledge of prior therapies and their benefit and toxicities and of molecular and clinical biomarkers can inform estimates of benefit from future therapies. Ultimately, a shared decision between the treating physician and the patient helps patients best accomplish their goals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European urology
European urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
43.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1753
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original articles and reviews on a broad spectrum of urological issues. Covering topics such as oncology, impotence, infertility, pediatrics, lithiasis and endourology, the journal also highlights recent advances in techniques, instrumentation, surgery, and pediatric urology. This comprehensive approach provides readers with an in-depth guide to international developments in urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信