全球生态系统氮循环在土地利用转换和逆转之间相互影响

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Yves Uwiragiye, Jing Wang, Yuanyuan Huang, Liangping Wu, Jiake Zhou, Yanhui Zhang, Meiqi Chen, Hang Jing, Yinfei Qian, Ahmed S. Elrys, Yi Cheng, Zucong Cai, Minggang Xu, Scott X. Chang, Christoph Müller
{"title":"全球生态系统氮循环在土地利用转换和逆转之间相互影响","authors":"Yves Uwiragiye,&nbsp;Jing Wang,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Huang,&nbsp;Liangping Wu,&nbsp;Jiake Zhou,&nbsp;Yanhui Zhang,&nbsp;Meiqi Chen,&nbsp;Hang Jing,&nbsp;Yinfei Qian,&nbsp;Ahmed S. Elrys,&nbsp;Yi Cheng,&nbsp;Zucong Cai,&nbsp;Minggang Xu,&nbsp;Scott X. Chang,&nbsp;Christoph Müller","doi":"10.1111/gcb.17537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Anthropogenic land-use practices influence ecosystem functions and the environment. Yet, the effect of global land-use change on ecosystem nitrogen (N) cycling remains unquantified despite that ecosystem N cycling plays a critical role in maintaining food security. Here, we analysed 2430 paired observations globally to show that converting natural to managed ecosystems increases ratios of autotrophic nitrification to ammonium immobilisation and nitrate to ammonium, but decreases soil immobilisation of mineral N, causing increased N losses via leaching and gaseous N emissions, such as nitrous oxide (e.g., via denitrification), resulting in a leaky N cycle. Changing land use from intensively managed to one that resembles natural ecosystems reversed N losses by 108% on average, resulting in a more conservative N cycle. Structural equation modelling revealed that changes in soil organic carbon, pH and carbon to N ratio were more important than changes in soil moisture content and temperature in predicting ecosystem N retention capacities following land-use conversion and its reversion. The hotspots of leaky N cycles were mostly in equatorial and tropical regions, as well as in Western Europe, the United States and China. Our results suggest that whether an ecosystem exhibits a conservative N cycle after land-use reversion depends on management practices.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Ecosystem Nitrogen Cycling Reciprocates Between Land-Use Conversion and Its Reversal\",\"authors\":\"Yves Uwiragiye,&nbsp;Jing Wang,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Huang,&nbsp;Liangping Wu,&nbsp;Jiake Zhou,&nbsp;Yanhui Zhang,&nbsp;Meiqi Chen,&nbsp;Hang Jing,&nbsp;Yinfei Qian,&nbsp;Ahmed S. Elrys,&nbsp;Yi Cheng,&nbsp;Zucong Cai,&nbsp;Minggang Xu,&nbsp;Scott X. Chang,&nbsp;Christoph Müller\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcb.17537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Anthropogenic land-use practices influence ecosystem functions and the environment. Yet, the effect of global land-use change on ecosystem nitrogen (N) cycling remains unquantified despite that ecosystem N cycling plays a critical role in maintaining food security. Here, we analysed 2430 paired observations globally to show that converting natural to managed ecosystems increases ratios of autotrophic nitrification to ammonium immobilisation and nitrate to ammonium, but decreases soil immobilisation of mineral N, causing increased N losses via leaching and gaseous N emissions, such as nitrous oxide (e.g., via denitrification), resulting in a leaky N cycle. Changing land use from intensively managed to one that resembles natural ecosystems reversed N losses by 108% on average, resulting in a more conservative N cycle. Structural equation modelling revealed that changes in soil organic carbon, pH and carbon to N ratio were more important than changes in soil moisture content and temperature in predicting ecosystem N retention capacities following land-use conversion and its reversion. The hotspots of leaky N cycles were mostly in equatorial and tropical regions, as well as in Western Europe, the United States and China. Our results suggest that whether an ecosystem exhibits a conservative N cycle after land-use reversion depends on management practices.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.17537\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.17537","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人为的土地利用方式会影响生态系统功能和环境。然而,全球土地利用变化对生态系统氮(N)循环的影响仍未量化,尽管生态系统氮循环在维持粮食安全方面发挥着至关重要的作用。在这里,我们分析了全球 2430 个配对观测数据,结果表明,将自然生态系统转变为管理型生态系统会提高自养硝化与铵固定化的比率以及硝酸盐与铵的比率,但会降低土壤对矿质氮的固定化,从而导致通过淋溶和气态氮排放(如通过反硝化)增加氮损失,造成氮循环泄漏。将土地用途从集约化管理转变为类似于自然生态系统,平均可使氮损失逆转 108%,从而使氮循环更加保守。结构方程模型显示,在预测土地用途转换及其恢复后生态系统的氮保持能力时,土壤有机碳、pH 值和碳氮比的变化比土壤含水量和温度的变化更重要。氮循环泄漏的热点地区主要在赤道和热带地区,以及西欧、美国和中国。我们的研究结果表明,土地用途转换后生态系统是否表现出保守的氮循环取决于管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global Ecosystem Nitrogen Cycling Reciprocates Between Land-Use Conversion and Its Reversal

Anthropogenic land-use practices influence ecosystem functions and the environment. Yet, the effect of global land-use change on ecosystem nitrogen (N) cycling remains unquantified despite that ecosystem N cycling plays a critical role in maintaining food security. Here, we analysed 2430 paired observations globally to show that converting natural to managed ecosystems increases ratios of autotrophic nitrification to ammonium immobilisation and nitrate to ammonium, but decreases soil immobilisation of mineral N, causing increased N losses via leaching and gaseous N emissions, such as nitrous oxide (e.g., via denitrification), resulting in a leaky N cycle. Changing land use from intensively managed to one that resembles natural ecosystems reversed N losses by 108% on average, resulting in a more conservative N cycle. Structural equation modelling revealed that changes in soil organic carbon, pH and carbon to N ratio were more important than changes in soil moisture content and temperature in predicting ecosystem N retention capacities following land-use conversion and its reversion. The hotspots of leaky N cycles were mostly in equatorial and tropical regions, as well as in Western Europe, the United States and China. Our results suggest that whether an ecosystem exhibits a conservative N cycle after land-use reversion depends on management practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信