关于农户-农场经营界面在家庭农场持久性中的作用的新见解以及对未来研究的呼吁

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Florence A. Becot , Sandra Contzen , Marie Reusch , Majda Černič Istenič , Julia Valliant , Shoshanah Inwood , Hannah Budge , Anna Kroeplin
{"title":"关于农户-农场经营界面在家庭农场持久性中的作用的新见解以及对未来研究的呼吁","authors":"Florence A. Becot ,&nbsp;Sandra Contzen ,&nbsp;Marie Reusch ,&nbsp;Majda Černič Istenič ,&nbsp;Julia Valliant ,&nbsp;Shoshanah Inwood ,&nbsp;Hannah Budge ,&nbsp;Anna Kroeplin","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rural social scientists have long sought to understand what the structure of agriculture will look like in the future, who is going to do the work, and under what conditions with a focus on family owned and operated farms. Central to the theorization of farm families' ability to continue farming in the midst of on-going changes are the deep inter-connections between the farm household and the farm operation and farm families’ ability to adjust how resources are used within the farm household and operation spheres. Yet in this paper we argue that the interface between the household and operation has largely been treated as a black box and when it has been considered, it has largely been from the vantage point of the farm operation at the expense of the farm household. We substantiate our argument by drawing on insights from our individual research and collective discussions during a three-day workshop around three themes (i.e. gender, life course and farm business cycle, formal and informal support systems). As an invitation for others to join us in opening a new line of research, we propose a research agenda and discuss considerations around research designs, data, funding, and collaborations to tackle this research agenda.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 103449"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New insights on the role of the farm household-farm operation interface in family farm persistence and a call for future research\",\"authors\":\"Florence A. Becot ,&nbsp;Sandra Contzen ,&nbsp;Marie Reusch ,&nbsp;Majda Černič Istenič ,&nbsp;Julia Valliant ,&nbsp;Shoshanah Inwood ,&nbsp;Hannah Budge ,&nbsp;Anna Kroeplin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Rural social scientists have long sought to understand what the structure of agriculture will look like in the future, who is going to do the work, and under what conditions with a focus on family owned and operated farms. Central to the theorization of farm families' ability to continue farming in the midst of on-going changes are the deep inter-connections between the farm household and the farm operation and farm families’ ability to adjust how resources are used within the farm household and operation spheres. Yet in this paper we argue that the interface between the household and operation has largely been treated as a black box and when it has been considered, it has largely been from the vantage point of the farm operation at the expense of the farm household. We substantiate our argument by drawing on insights from our individual research and collective discussions during a three-day workshop around three themes (i.e. gender, life course and farm business cycle, formal and informal support systems). As an invitation for others to join us in opening a new line of research, we propose a research agenda and discuss considerations around research designs, data, funding, and collaborations to tackle this research agenda.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016724002535\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016724002535","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,农村社会科学家一直试图了解未来的农业结构是怎样的,谁将从事这项工作,以及在什么条件下,重点是家庭拥有和经营的农场。关于农户在持续变化中继续耕作的能力,其理论核心是农户与农场经营之间的深层次相互联系,以及农户调整农户和经营范围内资源使用方式的能力。然而,在本文中,我们认为农户与农场经营之间的联系在很大程度上被视为黑箱,即使对其进行了考虑,也主要是从农场经营的角度出发,而忽略了农户。我们在为期三天的研讨会上围绕三个主题(即性别、生命历程和农场经营周期、正式和非正式支持系统)开展了个人研究和集体讨论,通过这些研究和讨论中的真知灼见来证实我们的论点。为了邀请其他人与我们一起开辟新的研究方向,我们提出了一个研究议程,并讨论了研究设计、数据、资金和合作等方面的注意事项,以解决这一研究议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New insights on the role of the farm household-farm operation interface in family farm persistence and a call for future research
Rural social scientists have long sought to understand what the structure of agriculture will look like in the future, who is going to do the work, and under what conditions with a focus on family owned and operated farms. Central to the theorization of farm families' ability to continue farming in the midst of on-going changes are the deep inter-connections between the farm household and the farm operation and farm families’ ability to adjust how resources are used within the farm household and operation spheres. Yet in this paper we argue that the interface between the household and operation has largely been treated as a black box and when it has been considered, it has largely been from the vantage point of the farm operation at the expense of the farm household. We substantiate our argument by drawing on insights from our individual research and collective discussions during a three-day workshop around three themes (i.e. gender, life course and farm business cycle, formal and informal support systems). As an invitation for others to join us in opening a new line of research, we propose a research agenda and discuss considerations around research designs, data, funding, and collaborations to tackle this research agenda.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信