Ya. V. Fedotova, R. Yu. Epifanov, I. I. Volkova, M. S. Maus, N. A. Nikitin, S. A. Aivazov, M. Yu. Khrebtov, A. A. Karpenko, R. I. Mullyadzhanov
{"title":"腹主动脉瘤血液动力学的个性化数值模拟:模拟结果对输入边界条件的敏感性分析","authors":"Ya. V. Fedotova, R. Yu. Epifanov, I. I. Volkova, M. S. Maus, N. A. Nikitin, S. A. Aivazov, M. Yu. Khrebtov, A. A. Karpenko, R. I. Mullyadzhanov","doi":"10.1134/S0869864324020161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The analysis was performed for input condition sensitivity of hemodynamic simulation performed for a zone of abdominal aortic aneurysm. We took three versions of patient-specific configurations of aneurysm decease and computed the haemodynamics with different spatial and velocity profiles at the aorta inlet. Their impact on hemodynamic characteristics was evaluated. At total, the study was performed for three spatial variants (uniform, parabolic, and parabolic-and-secondary-flow velocity profiles) and three versions of time behavior of velocity profiles: this produces nine cases for every of three chosen geometries. The study demonstrated that one can neglect the impact of the spatial profile for inlet velocity (including the non-coaxial velocity vector components). Meanwhile, the value of reverse diastolic flow is significant for the solution. However, simulation in the zone of abdominal aortic aneurysm does not demonstrate great differences in simulation results for the values of wall shear stress and velocity for the data averaged over a cardiac cycle. For the distribution of the oscillation index of shear, the maximum deviation from the basic solution is about ∼ 10 %, which is quite acceptable for clinical applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":800,"journal":{"name":"Thermophysics and Aeromechanics","volume":"31 2","pages":"375 - 391"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personalized numerical simulation for hemodynamics of abdominal aortic aneurysm: analysis of simulation results sensitivity to the input boundary conditions\",\"authors\":\"Ya. V. Fedotova, R. Yu. Epifanov, I. I. Volkova, M. S. Maus, N. A. Nikitin, S. A. Aivazov, M. Yu. Khrebtov, A. A. Karpenko, R. I. Mullyadzhanov\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S0869864324020161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The analysis was performed for input condition sensitivity of hemodynamic simulation performed for a zone of abdominal aortic aneurysm. We took three versions of patient-specific configurations of aneurysm decease and computed the haemodynamics with different spatial and velocity profiles at the aorta inlet. Their impact on hemodynamic characteristics was evaluated. At total, the study was performed for three spatial variants (uniform, parabolic, and parabolic-and-secondary-flow velocity profiles) and three versions of time behavior of velocity profiles: this produces nine cases for every of three chosen geometries. The study demonstrated that one can neglect the impact of the spatial profile for inlet velocity (including the non-coaxial velocity vector components). Meanwhile, the value of reverse diastolic flow is significant for the solution. However, simulation in the zone of abdominal aortic aneurysm does not demonstrate great differences in simulation results for the values of wall shear stress and velocity for the data averaged over a cardiac cycle. For the distribution of the oscillation index of shear, the maximum deviation from the basic solution is about ∼ 10 %, which is quite acceptable for clinical applications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thermophysics and Aeromechanics\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"375 - 391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thermophysics and Aeromechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0869864324020161\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermophysics and Aeromechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0869864324020161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Personalized numerical simulation for hemodynamics of abdominal aortic aneurysm: analysis of simulation results sensitivity to the input boundary conditions
The analysis was performed for input condition sensitivity of hemodynamic simulation performed for a zone of abdominal aortic aneurysm. We took three versions of patient-specific configurations of aneurysm decease and computed the haemodynamics with different spatial and velocity profiles at the aorta inlet. Their impact on hemodynamic characteristics was evaluated. At total, the study was performed for three spatial variants (uniform, parabolic, and parabolic-and-secondary-flow velocity profiles) and three versions of time behavior of velocity profiles: this produces nine cases for every of three chosen geometries. The study demonstrated that one can neglect the impact of the spatial profile for inlet velocity (including the non-coaxial velocity vector components). Meanwhile, the value of reverse diastolic flow is significant for the solution. However, simulation in the zone of abdominal aortic aneurysm does not demonstrate great differences in simulation results for the values of wall shear stress and velocity for the data averaged over a cardiac cycle. For the distribution of the oscillation index of shear, the maximum deviation from the basic solution is about ∼ 10 %, which is quite acceptable for clinical applications.
期刊介绍:
The journal Thermophysics and Aeromechanics publishes original reports, reviews, and discussions on the following topics: hydrogasdynamics, heat and mass transfer, turbulence, means and methods of aero- and thermophysical experiment, physics of low-temperature plasma, and physical and technical problems of energetics. These topics are the prior fields of investigation at the Institute of Thermophysics and the Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS), which are the founders of the journal along with SB RAS. This publication promotes an exchange of information between the researchers of Russia and the international scientific community.