大流行病情况下疏散和收容医疗条件脆弱人群的后勤工作

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Diaz Rafael;Acero Beatriz;Behr Joshua;Juita-Elena Yusuf
{"title":"大流行病情况下疏散和收容医疗条件脆弱人群的后勤工作","authors":"Diaz Rafael;Acero Beatriz;Behr Joshua;Juita-Elena Yusuf","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2024.3458901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the logistics of evacuation and sheltering of medically fragile populations, who tend to have less capacity to safely manage rapidly shifting storm-induced conditions under a pandemic environment. Health awareness and the health and financial impacts of the pandemic have altered households’ evacuation and sheltering calculus. The timing and volume of evacuees have significant implications for configuring available transportation infrastructures and means and opening shelters and refuge of last resort as the storm materializes and degrades the built environment. This article asks five questions about the effect of medical fragility, health risk awareness, health and financial impacts of the pandemic, and the availability of noncongregate shelters on evacuation and sheltering behavior. The empirical analysis uses data from a survey of 2200 households conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic to gauge risk perceptions under the compound threat of a hurricane and pandemic. Takeaways from our findings have significant implications for managers and policymakers and indicate, first, that medically fragile households are more likely to evacuate than nonmedically fragile households. Second, households with health concerns about the pandemic are more likely to evacuate regardless of medical fragility. Third, the expected sheltering of these segments varies depending on the facilities provided by the authorities. Anticipating the behavior of population groups allows managers to deploy technology that supports effective resource configuration and coordination and provides effective emergency service during evacuation planning and execution.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"71 ","pages":"14882-14896"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Logistics of Evacuating and Sheltering Medically Fragile Populations Under Pandemics\",\"authors\":\"Diaz Rafael;Acero Beatriz;Behr Joshua;Juita-Elena Yusuf\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEM.2024.3458901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the logistics of evacuation and sheltering of medically fragile populations, who tend to have less capacity to safely manage rapidly shifting storm-induced conditions under a pandemic environment. Health awareness and the health and financial impacts of the pandemic have altered households’ evacuation and sheltering calculus. The timing and volume of evacuees have significant implications for configuring available transportation infrastructures and means and opening shelters and refuge of last resort as the storm materializes and degrades the built environment. This article asks five questions about the effect of medical fragility, health risk awareness, health and financial impacts of the pandemic, and the availability of noncongregate shelters on evacuation and sheltering behavior. The empirical analysis uses data from a survey of 2200 households conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic to gauge risk perceptions under the compound threat of a hurricane and pandemic. Takeaways from our findings have significant implications for managers and policymakers and indicate, first, that medically fragile households are more likely to evacuate than nonmedically fragile households. Second, households with health concerns about the pandemic are more likely to evacuate regardless of medical fragility. Third, the expected sheltering of these segments varies depending on the facilities provided by the authorities. Anticipating the behavior of population groups allows managers to deploy technology that supports effective resource configuration and coordination and provides effective emergency service during evacuation planning and execution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management\",\"volume\":\"71 \",\"pages\":\"14882-14896\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10679081/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10679081/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章探讨了医疗脆弱人群撤离和避难的后勤问题,在大流行病环境下,他们往往没有能力安全地应对风暴引起的快速变化。健康意识以及大流行病对健康和经济的影响改变了家庭撤离和避难的考虑。随着暴风雨的来临和建筑环境的恶化,撤离人员的时间和数量对现有交通基础设施和手段的配置以及避难所和最后避难所的开放都会产生重大影响。本文提出了五个问题,分别涉及医疗脆弱性、健康风险意识、大流行病对健康和财务的影响以及非集中式避难所的可用性对疏散和避难行为的影响。实证分析使用了 COVID-19 大流行期间对 2200 个家庭进行的调查数据,以衡量在飓风和大流行双重威胁下的风险意识。我们的研究结果对管理者和政策制定者具有重要意义,它表明:首先,身体脆弱的家庭比非身体脆弱的家庭更有可能撤离。其次,对大流行病有健康顾虑的家庭更有可能撤离,而与医疗脆弱性无关。第三,根据当局提供的设施不同,这些群体的预期避难情况也不同。通过预测人群的行为,管理者可以部署支持有效资源配置和协调的技术,并在疏散计划和执行过程中提供有效的应急服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Logistics of Evacuating and Sheltering Medically Fragile Populations Under Pandemics
This article examines the logistics of evacuation and sheltering of medically fragile populations, who tend to have less capacity to safely manage rapidly shifting storm-induced conditions under a pandemic environment. Health awareness and the health and financial impacts of the pandemic have altered households’ evacuation and sheltering calculus. The timing and volume of evacuees have significant implications for configuring available transportation infrastructures and means and opening shelters and refuge of last resort as the storm materializes and degrades the built environment. This article asks five questions about the effect of medical fragility, health risk awareness, health and financial impacts of the pandemic, and the availability of noncongregate shelters on evacuation and sheltering behavior. The empirical analysis uses data from a survey of 2200 households conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic to gauge risk perceptions under the compound threat of a hurricane and pandemic. Takeaways from our findings have significant implications for managers and policymakers and indicate, first, that medically fragile households are more likely to evacuate than nonmedically fragile households. Second, households with health concerns about the pandemic are more likely to evacuate regardless of medical fragility. Third, the expected sheltering of these segments varies depending on the facilities provided by the authorities. Anticipating the behavior of population groups allows managers to deploy technology that supports effective resource configuration and coordination and provides effective emergency service during evacuation planning and execution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信