护理工会:对员工、患者和管理者成果的范围审查

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Andrew M. Dierkes PhD , Kristin H. Gigli PhD, APRN, CPNP-AC , Branden Dutchess BA , Grant Martsolf PhD, MPH
{"title":"护理工会:对员工、患者和管理者成果的范围审查","authors":"Andrew M. Dierkes PhD ,&nbsp;Kristin H. Gigli PhD, APRN, CPNP-AC ,&nbsp;Branden Dutchess BA ,&nbsp;Grant Martsolf PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nursing labor organization is consequential to many stakeholders, but collective evidence for outcomes associated with nurse unionization is lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To synthesize evidence of associations between nursing unions and nurse, patient, and system outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scoping review.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Twenty-four articles spanning nearly 50<!--> <!-->years were abstracted. Most studies (<em>n</em> = 16; 67%) included nurse outcomes, usually remuneration (<em>n</em> = 10; 42%). Patient and system outcomes were less common (for each: <em>n</em> = 7; 29%). Union wage premiums were modest. Evidence for other nurse outcomes (e.g., job satisfaction, retention) was limited and mixed. Unionization was associated with improvements in many but not all patient outcomes studied, and with operational differences, including decreased staffing and labor substitution.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Collective bargaining outcomes may help administrators understand nurses’ needs and concerns and thereby improve nurse recruitment and retention. For example, modest wage effects may signal nonwage priorities among nurses, which are understudied and worthy subjects of future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54705,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Outlook","volume":"72 6","pages":"Article 102292"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nursing unions: A scoping review of outcomes for employees, patients, and administrators\",\"authors\":\"Andrew M. Dierkes PhD ,&nbsp;Kristin H. Gigli PhD, APRN, CPNP-AC ,&nbsp;Branden Dutchess BA ,&nbsp;Grant Martsolf PhD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nursing labor organization is consequential to many stakeholders, but collective evidence for outcomes associated with nurse unionization is lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To synthesize evidence of associations between nursing unions and nurse, patient, and system outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scoping review.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Twenty-four articles spanning nearly 50<!--> <!-->years were abstracted. Most studies (<em>n</em> = 16; 67%) included nurse outcomes, usually remuneration (<em>n</em> = 10; 42%). Patient and system outcomes were less common (for each: <em>n</em> = 7; 29%). Union wage premiums were modest. Evidence for other nurse outcomes (e.g., job satisfaction, retention) was limited and mixed. Unionization was associated with improvements in many but not all patient outcomes studied, and with operational differences, including decreased staffing and labor substitution.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Collective bargaining outcomes may help administrators understand nurses’ needs and concerns and thereby improve nurse recruitment and retention. For example, modest wage effects may signal nonwage priorities among nurses, which are understudied and worthy subjects of future research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"volume\":\"72 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 102292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655424001854\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655424001854","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景护理劳工组织对许多利益相关者都具有重要意义,但缺乏与护士工会相关的集体成果证据。目的综合护理工会与护士、患者和系统成果之间的关联证据。大多数研究(n = 16;67%)包括护士的成果,通常是薪酬(n = 10;42%)。患者和系统结果的研究较少(各为 7 篇;29%)。工会的工资溢价并不高。有关其他护士成果(如工作满意度、留用率)的证据有限,且好坏参半。讨论集体谈判的结果可能有助于管理者了解护士的需求和关注点,从而改善护士招聘和留用。例如,适度的工资效应可能预示着护士的非工资优先事项,而这一问题尚未得到充分研究,值得在未来开展研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nursing unions: A scoping review of outcomes for employees, patients, and administrators

Background

Nursing labor organization is consequential to many stakeholders, but collective evidence for outcomes associated with nurse unionization is lacking.

Purpose

To synthesize evidence of associations between nursing unions and nurse, patient, and system outcomes.

Methods

A scoping review.

Findings

Twenty-four articles spanning nearly 50 years were abstracted. Most studies (n = 16; 67%) included nurse outcomes, usually remuneration (n = 10; 42%). Patient and system outcomes were less common (for each: n = 7; 29%). Union wage premiums were modest. Evidence for other nurse outcomes (e.g., job satisfaction, retention) was limited and mixed. Unionization was associated with improvements in many but not all patient outcomes studied, and with operational differences, including decreased staffing and labor substitution.

Discussion

Collective bargaining outcomes may help administrators understand nurses’ needs and concerns and thereby improve nurse recruitment and retention. For example, modest wage effects may signal nonwage priorities among nurses, which are understudied and worthy subjects of future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Outlook
Nursing Outlook 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Nursing Outlook, a bimonthly journal, provides innovative ideas for nursing leaders through peer-reviewed articles and timely reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in nursing practice, education, and research, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. Nursing Outlook is the official journal of the American Academy of Nursing and the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science and supports their mission to serve the public and the nursing profession by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. The journal is included in MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Journal Citation Reports published by Clarivate Analytics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信