MVA-BN 疫苗的有效性:疫情爆发环境下真实世界证据的系统性审查

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Lauren M.K. Mason , Estefania Betancur , Margarita Riera-Montes , Florian Lienert , Suzanne Scheele
{"title":"MVA-BN 疫苗的有效性:疫情爆发环境下真实世界证据的系统性审查","authors":"Lauren M.K. Mason ,&nbsp;Estefania Betancur ,&nbsp;Margarita Riera-Montes ,&nbsp;Florian Lienert ,&nbsp;Suzanne Scheele","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><strong>Background</strong>: Mpox is a disease endemic to Central and West Africa. It caused outbreaks in non-endemic countries, mainly in 2022. The endemic Democratic Republic of Congo is currently experiencing its largest outbreak yet. The vaccine Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) is approved for active immunization against mpox and smallpox. Since the outbreak in 2022, real-world studies have assessed MVA-BN's vaccine effectiveness (VE) against mpox, and this systematic literature review aims to summarize the most current evidence.</div><div><strong>Methods</strong>: Medline (via PubMed), Embase, and LILACS were searched, as well as grey literature sources and publications' bibliographies to identify observational studies published between 1/Jan/2022 and 28/Feb/2024 that estimate the VE of MVA-BN against mpox or provide risk measures that allow calculation of these VE estimates. Data were presented descriptively in tables and text; the methodological quality of included records was assessed using NHLBI/NIH quality assessment tools.</div><div><strong>Results</strong>: The literature search identified 16 records that fit the inclusion criteria. The studies took place in high-income countries and were heterogeneous in design, setting, and definition of at-risk populations. MVA-BN VE estimates against mpox infection were assessed. Where the study population was exclusively or primarily those receiving pre-exposure prophylactic vaccination, the adjusted VE estimates ranged from 35 % to 86 % (<em>n</em> = 8 studies) for one dose and from 66 % to 90 % (<em>n</em> = 5) for two doses. Where only post-exposure prophylactic vaccination was assessed, adjusted VE estimates were reported for one dose only at 78 % and 89 % (<em>n</em> = 2). Additionally, MVA-BN reduced the risk of mpox-related hospitalization in one study and the severity of mpox clinical manifestations in two studies.</div><div><strong>Conclusions</strong>: Despite heterogeneity in study design, setting, and at-risk populations, the reported VE estimates against mpox infection demonstrated the effectiveness of one or two doses of MVA-BN in the context of an outbreak across multiple countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"42 26","pages":"Article 126409"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MVA-BN vaccine effectiveness: A systematic review of real-world evidence in outbreak settings\",\"authors\":\"Lauren M.K. Mason ,&nbsp;Estefania Betancur ,&nbsp;Margarita Riera-Montes ,&nbsp;Florian Lienert ,&nbsp;Suzanne Scheele\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><strong>Background</strong>: Mpox is a disease endemic to Central and West Africa. It caused outbreaks in non-endemic countries, mainly in 2022. The endemic Democratic Republic of Congo is currently experiencing its largest outbreak yet. The vaccine Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) is approved for active immunization against mpox and smallpox. Since the outbreak in 2022, real-world studies have assessed MVA-BN's vaccine effectiveness (VE) against mpox, and this systematic literature review aims to summarize the most current evidence.</div><div><strong>Methods</strong>: Medline (via PubMed), Embase, and LILACS were searched, as well as grey literature sources and publications' bibliographies to identify observational studies published between 1/Jan/2022 and 28/Feb/2024 that estimate the VE of MVA-BN against mpox or provide risk measures that allow calculation of these VE estimates. Data were presented descriptively in tables and text; the methodological quality of included records was assessed using NHLBI/NIH quality assessment tools.</div><div><strong>Results</strong>: The literature search identified 16 records that fit the inclusion criteria. The studies took place in high-income countries and were heterogeneous in design, setting, and definition of at-risk populations. MVA-BN VE estimates against mpox infection were assessed. Where the study population was exclusively or primarily those receiving pre-exposure prophylactic vaccination, the adjusted VE estimates ranged from 35 % to 86 % (<em>n</em> = 8 studies) for one dose and from 66 % to 90 % (<em>n</em> = 5) for two doses. Where only post-exposure prophylactic vaccination was assessed, adjusted VE estimates were reported for one dose only at 78 % and 89 % (<em>n</em> = 2). Additionally, MVA-BN reduced the risk of mpox-related hospitalization in one study and the severity of mpox clinical manifestations in two studies.</div><div><strong>Conclusions</strong>: Despite heterogeneity in study design, setting, and at-risk populations, the reported VE estimates against mpox infection demonstrated the effectiveness of one or two doses of MVA-BN in the context of an outbreak across multiple countries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine\",\"volume\":\"42 26\",\"pages\":\"Article 126409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24010910\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24010910","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景介绍麻腮风是一种流行于中非和西非的疾病。它主要于 2022 年在非流行国家爆发。流行的刚果民主共和国目前正在经历迄今为止最大规模的疫情爆发。改良型安卡拉-巴伐利亚-北欧(MVA-BN)疫苗已被批准用于天花和麻痘的主动免疫。自2022年疫情爆发以来,对MVA-BN的天花疫苗有效性(VE)进行了真实世界研究评估,本系统文献综述旨在总结最新证据:方法:对 Medline(通过 PubMed)、Embase 和 LILACS 以及灰色文献来源和出版物书目进行了检索,以确定在 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 2024 年 2 月 28 日期间发表的观察性研究,这些研究估计了 MVA-BN 对天花的 VE,或提供了可计算这些 VE 估计值的风险度量。数据以表格和文本的形式描述;采用 NHLBI/NIH 质量评估工具对纳入记录的方法学质量进行评估:文献检索发现了 16 条符合纳入标准的记录。这些研究发生在高收入国家,在设计、环境和高危人群定义方面存在差异。评估了针对 mpox 感染的 MVA-BN VE 估计值。如果研究人群完全或主要是那些接受暴露前预防接种的人,那么调整后的 VE 估计值为:接种一剂疫苗从 35% 到 86%(8 项研究)不等,接种两剂疫苗从 66% 到 90%(5 项研究)不等。在仅评估暴露后预防接种的情况下,仅报告了一剂疫苗的调整 VE 估计值为 78 % 和 89 %(n = 2)。此外,在一项研究中,MVA-BN 降低了与水痘相关的住院风险,在两项研究中降低了水痘临床表现的严重程度:结论:尽管在研究设计、环境和高危人群方面存在差异,但所报告的针对天花感染的VE估计值表明,在多个国家爆发疫情的情况下,服用一到两剂MVA-BN是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MVA-BN vaccine effectiveness: A systematic review of real-world evidence in outbreak settings
Background: Mpox is a disease endemic to Central and West Africa. It caused outbreaks in non-endemic countries, mainly in 2022. The endemic Democratic Republic of Congo is currently experiencing its largest outbreak yet. The vaccine Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) is approved for active immunization against mpox and smallpox. Since the outbreak in 2022, real-world studies have assessed MVA-BN's vaccine effectiveness (VE) against mpox, and this systematic literature review aims to summarize the most current evidence.
Methods: Medline (via PubMed), Embase, and LILACS were searched, as well as grey literature sources and publications' bibliographies to identify observational studies published between 1/Jan/2022 and 28/Feb/2024 that estimate the VE of MVA-BN against mpox or provide risk measures that allow calculation of these VE estimates. Data were presented descriptively in tables and text; the methodological quality of included records was assessed using NHLBI/NIH quality assessment tools.
Results: The literature search identified 16 records that fit the inclusion criteria. The studies took place in high-income countries and were heterogeneous in design, setting, and definition of at-risk populations. MVA-BN VE estimates against mpox infection were assessed. Where the study population was exclusively or primarily those receiving pre-exposure prophylactic vaccination, the adjusted VE estimates ranged from 35 % to 86 % (n = 8 studies) for one dose and from 66 % to 90 % (n = 5) for two doses. Where only post-exposure prophylactic vaccination was assessed, adjusted VE estimates were reported for one dose only at 78 % and 89 % (n = 2). Additionally, MVA-BN reduced the risk of mpox-related hospitalization in one study and the severity of mpox clinical manifestations in two studies.
Conclusions: Despite heterogeneity in study design, setting, and at-risk populations, the reported VE estimates against mpox infection demonstrated the effectiveness of one or two doses of MVA-BN in the context of an outbreak across multiple countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信