Bruno A.A. Monteiro , Gabriel L. Canguçu , Leonardo M.S. Jorge , Rafael H. Vareto , Bryan S. Oliveira , Thales H. Silva , Luiz Alberto Lima , Alexei M.C. Machado , William Robson Schwartz , Pedro O.S. Vaz-de-Melo
{"title":"地震图像分割深度学习文献综述","authors":"Bruno A.A. Monteiro , Gabriel L. Canguçu , Leonardo M.S. Jorge , Rafael H. Vareto , Bryan S. Oliveira , Thales H. Silva , Luiz Alberto Lima , Alexei M.C. Machado , William Robson Schwartz , Pedro O.S. Vaz-de-Melo","doi":"10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This systematic literature review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of deep learning (DL) specifically targeted at semantic segmentation in seismic data, with a particular focus on facies segmentation. We begin by comparing the contributions of DL to traditional techniques used in seismic image interpretation. The review then explores the learning paradigms, architectures, loss functions, public datasets, and evaluation metrics employed in seismic data segmentation. While supervised learning remains the dominant approach, recent years have seen a growing interest in semi-supervised and unsupervised methods to address the challenge of limited labeled data. Additionally, we found that the U-Net architecture is the most prevalent backbone for semantic segmentation, appearing in one-third of the articles reviewed. We also present a comprehensive compilation of the results obtained by 24 methods and discuss the challenges and research opportunities in this field. Notably, the lack of standardized protocols for performance comparison, combined with variability in datasets and evaluation metrics across studies, raises questions about what truly constitutes the current state of the art in semantic segmentation of seismic data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11483,"journal":{"name":"Earth-Science Reviews","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 104955"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Literature review on deep learning for the segmentation of seismic images\",\"authors\":\"Bruno A.A. Monteiro , Gabriel L. Canguçu , Leonardo M.S. Jorge , Rafael H. Vareto , Bryan S. Oliveira , Thales H. Silva , Luiz Alberto Lima , Alexei M.C. Machado , William Robson Schwartz , Pedro O.S. Vaz-de-Melo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This systematic literature review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of deep learning (DL) specifically targeted at semantic segmentation in seismic data, with a particular focus on facies segmentation. We begin by comparing the contributions of DL to traditional techniques used in seismic image interpretation. The review then explores the learning paradigms, architectures, loss functions, public datasets, and evaluation metrics employed in seismic data segmentation. While supervised learning remains the dominant approach, recent years have seen a growing interest in semi-supervised and unsupervised methods to address the challenge of limited labeled data. Additionally, we found that the U-Net architecture is the most prevalent backbone for semantic segmentation, appearing in one-third of the articles reviewed. We also present a comprehensive compilation of the results obtained by 24 methods and discuss the challenges and research opportunities in this field. Notably, the lack of standardized protocols for performance comparison, combined with variability in datasets and evaluation metrics across studies, raises questions about what truly constitutes the current state of the art in semantic segmentation of seismic data.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth-Science Reviews\",\"volume\":\"258 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104955\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth-Science Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825224002836\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth-Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825224002836","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Literature review on deep learning for the segmentation of seismic images
This systematic literature review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of deep learning (DL) specifically targeted at semantic segmentation in seismic data, with a particular focus on facies segmentation. We begin by comparing the contributions of DL to traditional techniques used in seismic image interpretation. The review then explores the learning paradigms, architectures, loss functions, public datasets, and evaluation metrics employed in seismic data segmentation. While supervised learning remains the dominant approach, recent years have seen a growing interest in semi-supervised and unsupervised methods to address the challenge of limited labeled data. Additionally, we found that the U-Net architecture is the most prevalent backbone for semantic segmentation, appearing in one-third of the articles reviewed. We also present a comprehensive compilation of the results obtained by 24 methods and discuss the challenges and research opportunities in this field. Notably, the lack of standardized protocols for performance comparison, combined with variability in datasets and evaluation metrics across studies, raises questions about what truly constitutes the current state of the art in semantic segmentation of seismic data.
期刊介绍:
Covering a much wider field than the usual specialist journals, Earth Science Reviews publishes review articles dealing with all aspects of Earth Sciences, and is an important vehicle for allowing readers to see their particular interest related to the Earth Sciences as a whole.