认知行为疗法、莫达非尼及其组合治疗多发性硬化症患者疲劳的疗效比较(COMBO-MS):随机、统计学家盲法、平行臂试验

Tiffany J Braley, Dawn M Ehde, Kevin N Alschuler, Roderick Little, Yee To Ng, Yuqi Zhai, Gloria von Geldern, Ronald D Chervin, Deirdre Conroy, Thomas R Valentine, Andrew R Romeo, Nicholas LaRocca, Maysa Hamade, Allison Jordan, Mini Singh, Benjamin M Segal, Anna L Kratz
{"title":"认知行为疗法、莫达非尼及其组合治疗多发性硬化症患者疲劳的疗效比较(COMBO-MS):随机、统计学家盲法、平行臂试验","authors":"Tiffany J Braley, Dawn M Ehde, Kevin N Alschuler, Roderick Little, Yee To Ng, Yuqi Zhai, Gloria von Geldern, Ronald D Chervin, Deirdre Conroy, Thomas R Valentine, Andrew R Romeo, Nicholas LaRocca, Maysa Hamade, Allison Jordan, Mini Singh, Benjamin M Segal, Anna L Kratz","doi":"10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00354-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Fatigue is one of the most disabling symptoms reported by people with multiple sclerosis. Although behavioural and pharmacological interventions might be partly beneficial, their combined effects have not been evaluated for multiple sclerosis fatigue, or examined with sufficient consideration of characteristics that might affect treatment response. In this comparative effectiveness research trial, we compared the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), modafinil, and their combination for treating multiple sclerosis fatigue.<h3>Methods</h3>This randomised, analyst-blinded, parallel-arm, comparative effectiveness trial was done at two universities in the USA. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with multiple sclerosis and problematic fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale [FSS] score ≥4) were randomly assigned (1:1:1), using a web-based treatment assignment system with minimisation, to receive CBT, modafinil, or both for 12 weeks. Statisticians were masked to group assignment, but participants, study neurologists, CBT interventionalists, and coordinators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was the change in Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) from baseline to 12 weeks, assessed using multiple linear regression, adjusted for age, sex, study site, anxiety, pain, baselines MFIS score, and physical activity. Analyses were done by intent to treat. The trial was registered with <span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT03621761</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, and is completed.<h3>Findings</h3>Between Nov 15, 2018, and June 2, 2021, 336 participants were randomly assigned treatment (114 assigned to CBT, 114 assigned to modafinil, and 108 assigned to combination therapy). At 12 weeks, CBT (n=103), modafinil (n=107), and combination therapy (n=102) were associated with clinically meaningful within-group MFIS reductions of 15·20 (SD 11·90), 16·90 (15·90), and 17·30 (16·20) points, respectively. Change in MFIS scores from baseline to 12 weeks did not differ between groups: relative to combination therapy, the adjusted total mean difference in MFIS change score was 1·88 (95% CI –2·21 to 5·96) for CBT and 1·20 (–2·83 to 5·23) for modafinil. Most common adverse events for modafinil-containing treatment groups included insomnia (eight [7%] for modafinil and eight [7%] for combination therapy) and anxiety (three [3%] for modafinil and nine [8%] for combination therapy).<h3>Interpretation</h3>Modafinil, CBT, and combination therapy were associated with similar reductions in the effects of multiple sclerosis fatigue at 12 weeks. Combination therapy was not associated with augmented improvement compared with the individual interventions. Further research is needed to determine whether effects of these interventions on multiple sclerosis-related fatigue is influenced by sleep hygiene and sleepiness. No serious adverse events related to the study drug were encountered.<h3>Funding</h3>Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and National Multiple Sclerosis Society.","PeriodicalId":22676,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Neurology","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy, modafinil, and their combination for treating fatigue in multiple sclerosis (COMBO-MS): a randomised, statistician-blinded, parallel-arm trial\",\"authors\":\"Tiffany J Braley, Dawn M Ehde, Kevin N Alschuler, Roderick Little, Yee To Ng, Yuqi Zhai, Gloria von Geldern, Ronald D Chervin, Deirdre Conroy, Thomas R Valentine, Andrew R Romeo, Nicholas LaRocca, Maysa Hamade, Allison Jordan, Mini Singh, Benjamin M Segal, Anna L Kratz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00354-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Background</h3>Fatigue is one of the most disabling symptoms reported by people with multiple sclerosis. Although behavioural and pharmacological interventions might be partly beneficial, their combined effects have not been evaluated for multiple sclerosis fatigue, or examined with sufficient consideration of characteristics that might affect treatment response. In this comparative effectiveness research trial, we compared the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), modafinil, and their combination for treating multiple sclerosis fatigue.<h3>Methods</h3>This randomised, analyst-blinded, parallel-arm, comparative effectiveness trial was done at two universities in the USA. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with multiple sclerosis and problematic fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale [FSS] score ≥4) were randomly assigned (1:1:1), using a web-based treatment assignment system with minimisation, to receive CBT, modafinil, or both for 12 weeks. Statisticians were masked to group assignment, but participants, study neurologists, CBT interventionalists, and coordinators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was the change in Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) from baseline to 12 weeks, assessed using multiple linear regression, adjusted for age, sex, study site, anxiety, pain, baselines MFIS score, and physical activity. Analyses were done by intent to treat. The trial was registered with <span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT03621761</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span>, and is completed.<h3>Findings</h3>Between Nov 15, 2018, and June 2, 2021, 336 participants were randomly assigned treatment (114 assigned to CBT, 114 assigned to modafinil, and 108 assigned to combination therapy). At 12 weeks, CBT (n=103), modafinil (n=107), and combination therapy (n=102) were associated with clinically meaningful within-group MFIS reductions of 15·20 (SD 11·90), 16·90 (15·90), and 17·30 (16·20) points, respectively. Change in MFIS scores from baseline to 12 weeks did not differ between groups: relative to combination therapy, the adjusted total mean difference in MFIS change score was 1·88 (95% CI –2·21 to 5·96) for CBT and 1·20 (–2·83 to 5·23) for modafinil. Most common adverse events for modafinil-containing treatment groups included insomnia (eight [7%] for modafinil and eight [7%] for combination therapy) and anxiety (three [3%] for modafinil and nine [8%] for combination therapy).<h3>Interpretation</h3>Modafinil, CBT, and combination therapy were associated with similar reductions in the effects of multiple sclerosis fatigue at 12 weeks. Combination therapy was not associated with augmented improvement compared with the individual interventions. Further research is needed to determine whether effects of these interventions on multiple sclerosis-related fatigue is influenced by sleep hygiene and sleepiness. No serious adverse events related to the study drug were encountered.<h3>Funding</h3>Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and National Multiple Sclerosis Society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet Neurology\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00354-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00354-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景疲劳是多发性硬化症患者报告的最严重的致残症状之一。虽然行为干预和药物干预可能会带来部分益处,但尚未对它们对多发性硬化症患者疲劳的综合效果进行评估,也未对可能影响治疗反应的特征进行充分考虑。在这项比较有效性研究试验中,我们比较了认知行为疗法(CBT)、莫达非尼及其组合治疗多发性硬化症疲劳的有效性。采用最小化的网络治疗分配系统,将患有多发性硬化症且存在疲劳问题(疲劳严重程度量表[FSS]评分≥4分)的成人(年龄≥18岁)随机分配(1:1:1)到接受CBT、莫达非尼或两者治疗,为期12周。统计人员对组别分配进行了蒙蔽,但参与者、研究神经学家、CBT干预专家和协调人员不对治疗分配进行蒙蔽。主要结果是改良疲劳影响量表(MFIS)从基线到 12 周的变化,采用多元线性回归进行评估,并对年龄、性别、研究地点、焦虑、疼痛、基线 MFIS 评分和体力活动进行调整。分析按治疗意向进行。该试验已在 clinicaltrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT03621761,现已完成。研究结果在 2018 年 11 月 15 日至 2021 年 6 月 2 日期间,336 名参与者被随机分配治疗(114 人分配到 CBT,114 人分配到莫达非尼,108 人分配到联合疗法)。12周时,CBT(人数=103)、莫达非尼(人数=107)和联合疗法(人数=102)分别使组内MFIS降低15-20(标清11-90)分、16-90(15-90)分和17-30(16-20)分,具有临床意义。从基线到12周的MFIS评分变化在组间没有差异:相对于联合疗法,CBT和莫达非尼的MFIS评分变化调整后总平均差异分别为1-88(95% CI -2-21至5-96)和1-20(-2-83至5-23)。含莫达非尼治疗组最常见的不良反应包括失眠(莫达非尼8例[7%],联合疗法8例[7%])和焦虑(莫达非尼3例[3%],联合疗法9例[8%])。与单独的干预措施相比,联合疗法与增强改善效果无关。还需要进一步研究,以确定这些干预措施对多发性硬化症相关疲劳的影响是否受睡眠卫生和嗜睡的影响。没有出现与研究药物相关的严重不良事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy, modafinil, and their combination for treating fatigue in multiple sclerosis (COMBO-MS): a randomised, statistician-blinded, parallel-arm trial

Background

Fatigue is one of the most disabling symptoms reported by people with multiple sclerosis. Although behavioural and pharmacological interventions might be partly beneficial, their combined effects have not been evaluated for multiple sclerosis fatigue, or examined with sufficient consideration of characteristics that might affect treatment response. In this comparative effectiveness research trial, we compared the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), modafinil, and their combination for treating multiple sclerosis fatigue.

Methods

This randomised, analyst-blinded, parallel-arm, comparative effectiveness trial was done at two universities in the USA. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with multiple sclerosis and problematic fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale [FSS] score ≥4) were randomly assigned (1:1:1), using a web-based treatment assignment system with minimisation, to receive CBT, modafinil, or both for 12 weeks. Statisticians were masked to group assignment, but participants, study neurologists, CBT interventionalists, and coordinators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was the change in Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) from baseline to 12 weeks, assessed using multiple linear regression, adjusted for age, sex, study site, anxiety, pain, baselines MFIS score, and physical activity. Analyses were done by intent to treat. The trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03621761, and is completed.

Findings

Between Nov 15, 2018, and June 2, 2021, 336 participants were randomly assigned treatment (114 assigned to CBT, 114 assigned to modafinil, and 108 assigned to combination therapy). At 12 weeks, CBT (n=103), modafinil (n=107), and combination therapy (n=102) were associated with clinically meaningful within-group MFIS reductions of 15·20 (SD 11·90), 16·90 (15·90), and 17·30 (16·20) points, respectively. Change in MFIS scores from baseline to 12 weeks did not differ between groups: relative to combination therapy, the adjusted total mean difference in MFIS change score was 1·88 (95% CI –2·21 to 5·96) for CBT and 1·20 (–2·83 to 5·23) for modafinil. Most common adverse events for modafinil-containing treatment groups included insomnia (eight [7%] for modafinil and eight [7%] for combination therapy) and anxiety (three [3%] for modafinil and nine [8%] for combination therapy).

Interpretation

Modafinil, CBT, and combination therapy were associated with similar reductions in the effects of multiple sclerosis fatigue at 12 weeks. Combination therapy was not associated with augmented improvement compared with the individual interventions. Further research is needed to determine whether effects of these interventions on multiple sclerosis-related fatigue is influenced by sleep hygiene and sleepiness. No serious adverse events related to the study drug were encountered.

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and National Multiple Sclerosis Society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信