Beth Thacker, Stephanie Hart, Kyle Wipfli, Jianlan Wang
{"title":"开发自由回答问题以评估学习助理的教学内容知识","authors":"Beth Thacker, Stephanie Hart, Kyle Wipfli, Jianlan Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11165-024-10203-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As introductory physics courses increasingly focus on student engagement, the use of Learning Assistants (LAs) has increased. LAs and other instructors need to have sufficient PCK to effectively guide student learning. Our goal was to research LAs observed PCK in the classroom and to develop a set of questions to assess LAs’ PCK. Our research question was: <i>Is it possible to assess LAs’ observed PCK with open-ended written questions?</i> We video-recorded student-LA interactions in the introductory physics classrooms, developed rubrics to describe the interactions between LAs and students, and developed free-response questions based on the authentic interactions from the videos. Our results are (1) a rubric to assess LAs PCK in video recordings or free response written assessments and (2) a set of open-ended written questions that assess LAs PCK. The LAs were dominant in one or two categories in both the written and video coding, making it possible to draw conclusions about their PCK. We answered our research question by demonstrating the development and validation of a set of questions to assess LA’s PCK. Our rubric can be used to analyze both videos and written questions by supervisors who are interested in assessing their LAs’ PCK.</p>","PeriodicalId":47988,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science Education","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Development of Free-Response Questions to Assess Learning Assistants’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge\",\"authors\":\"Beth Thacker, Stephanie Hart, Kyle Wipfli, Jianlan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11165-024-10203-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As introductory physics courses increasingly focus on student engagement, the use of Learning Assistants (LAs) has increased. LAs and other instructors need to have sufficient PCK to effectively guide student learning. Our goal was to research LAs observed PCK in the classroom and to develop a set of questions to assess LAs’ PCK. Our research question was: <i>Is it possible to assess LAs’ observed PCK with open-ended written questions?</i> We video-recorded student-LA interactions in the introductory physics classrooms, developed rubrics to describe the interactions between LAs and students, and developed free-response questions based on the authentic interactions from the videos. Our results are (1) a rubric to assess LAs PCK in video recordings or free response written assessments and (2) a set of open-ended written questions that assess LAs PCK. The LAs were dominant in one or two categories in both the written and video coding, making it possible to draw conclusions about their PCK. We answered our research question by demonstrating the development and validation of a set of questions to assess LA’s PCK. Our rubric can be used to analyze both videos and written questions by supervisors who are interested in assessing their LAs’ PCK.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Science Education\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10203-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10203-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Development of Free-Response Questions to Assess Learning Assistants’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge
As introductory physics courses increasingly focus on student engagement, the use of Learning Assistants (LAs) has increased. LAs and other instructors need to have sufficient PCK to effectively guide student learning. Our goal was to research LAs observed PCK in the classroom and to develop a set of questions to assess LAs’ PCK. Our research question was: Is it possible to assess LAs’ observed PCK with open-ended written questions? We video-recorded student-LA interactions in the introductory physics classrooms, developed rubrics to describe the interactions between LAs and students, and developed free-response questions based on the authentic interactions from the videos. Our results are (1) a rubric to assess LAs PCK in video recordings or free response written assessments and (2) a set of open-ended written questions that assess LAs PCK. The LAs were dominant in one or two categories in both the written and video coding, making it possible to draw conclusions about their PCK. We answered our research question by demonstrating the development and validation of a set of questions to assess LA’s PCK. Our rubric can be used to analyze both videos and written questions by supervisors who are interested in assessing their LAs’ PCK.
期刊介绍:
2020 Five-Year Impact Factor: 4.021
2020 Impact Factor: 5.439
Ranking: 107/1319 (Education) – Scopus
2020 CiteScore 34.7 – Scopus
Research in Science Education (RISE ) is highly regarded and widely recognised as a leading international journal for the promotion of scholarly science education research that is of interest to a wide readership.
RISE publishes scholarly work that promotes science education research in all contexts and at all levels of education. This intention is aligned with the goals of Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA), the association connected with the journal.
You should consider submitting your manscript to RISE if your research:
Examines contexts such as early childhood, primary, secondary, tertiary, workplace, and informal learning as they relate to science education; and
Advances our knowledge in science education research rather than reproducing what we already know.
RISE will consider scholarly works that explore areas such as STEM, health, environment, cognitive science, neuroscience, psychology and higher education where science education is forefronted.
The scholarly works of interest published within RISE reflect and speak to a diversity of opinions, approaches and contexts. Additionally, the journal’s editorial team welcomes a diversity of form in relation to science education-focused submissions. With this in mind, RISE seeks to publish empirical research papers.
Empircal contributions are:
Theoretically or conceptually grounded;
Relevant to science education theory and practice;
Highlight limitations of the study; and
Identify possible future research opportunities.
From time to time, we commission independent reviewers to undertake book reviews of recent monographs, edited collections and/or textbooks.
Before you submit your manuscript to RISE, please consider the following checklist. Your paper is:
No longer than 6000 words, including references.
Sufficiently proof read to ensure strong grammar, syntax, coherence and good readability;
Explicitly stating the significant and/or innovative contribution to the body of knowledge in your field in science education;
Internationalised in the sense that your work has relevance beyond your context to a broader audience; and
Making a contribution to the ongoing conversation by engaging substantively with prior research published in RISE.
While we encourage authors to submit papers to a maximum length of 6000 words, in rare cases where the authors make a persuasive case that a work makes a highly significant original contribution to knowledge in science education, the editors may choose to publish longer works.