数学能力的高低:数学能力分组的共同和独特纵向预测因素

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Stanley Cheng , Rebecca Bull , Emma C. Burns , David Muñez
{"title":"数学能力的高低:数学能力分组的共同和独特纵向预测因素","authors":"Stanley Cheng ,&nbsp;Rebecca Bull ,&nbsp;Emma C. Burns ,&nbsp;David Muñez","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current study examines how kindergarten domain-general and domain-specific factors, mathematical skills at primary 1 (P1), and socioeconomic status (SES) predict high versus low (top and bottom 13th percentile) mathematical ability at primary 6 (P6). Four-hundred-and-seven P6 students had previously completed the measures. Logistic path analyses showed that SES, P1 mathematics, and fluid intelligence showed direct significant effects on P6 high achievement group membership. Visuospatial working memory, SES, reading, and P1 mathematics showed direct effects on P6 low group membership. Number sense, fine motor skills, and reading demonstrated indirect effects on both group memberships through P1 mathematics. No significant effect was found for executive functioning or verbal working memory. Findings suggest that there is a qualitative difference in mathematical ability across the performance spectrum. Assessment and instruction should be differentiated to account for predictors that are specific to either end of the ability spectrum.</div></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implications of the research</h3><div>Mathematical ability plays a critical role in future academic success and quality of life, and also provides the foundational knowledge for engagement in STEM school subjects and careers. While we know there are some early cognitive and environmental factors that predict future mathematical outcomes, little is known about whether they predict both mathematical high and low achievers differently. This study is one of very few that uses a large-scale longitudinal design to track how early factors predict students' mathematical performance across the two ends of the achievement continuum over eight years. The findings add to the existing literature that cognitive factors predict mathematical competencies differently across developmental time, and that there are some common and unique predictors of performance at the two ends of the achievement continuum. The outcomes of the study inform educators that fine motor skills, basic reading skills, and number sense are likely to be important fundamental skills for early mathematical development, which may have a carry-effect on both mathematical success and failure in late primary school. Visuospatial working memory and basic reading skills are likely to be particularly important to prevent students from falling behind, whereas logical reasoning skills appear to be particularly important for mathematically talented students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 102570"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The highs and lows of mathematical ability: Shared and distinct longitudinal predictors of mathematical ability grouping\",\"authors\":\"Stanley Cheng ,&nbsp;Rebecca Bull ,&nbsp;Emma C. Burns ,&nbsp;David Muñez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The current study examines how kindergarten domain-general and domain-specific factors, mathematical skills at primary 1 (P1), and socioeconomic status (SES) predict high versus low (top and bottom 13th percentile) mathematical ability at primary 6 (P6). Four-hundred-and-seven P6 students had previously completed the measures. Logistic path analyses showed that SES, P1 mathematics, and fluid intelligence showed direct significant effects on P6 high achievement group membership. Visuospatial working memory, SES, reading, and P1 mathematics showed direct effects on P6 low group membership. Number sense, fine motor skills, and reading demonstrated indirect effects on both group memberships through P1 mathematics. No significant effect was found for executive functioning or verbal working memory. Findings suggest that there is a qualitative difference in mathematical ability across the performance spectrum. Assessment and instruction should be differentiated to account for predictors that are specific to either end of the ability spectrum.</div></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implications of the research</h3><div>Mathematical ability plays a critical role in future academic success and quality of life, and also provides the foundational knowledge for engagement in STEM school subjects and careers. While we know there are some early cognitive and environmental factors that predict future mathematical outcomes, little is known about whether they predict both mathematical high and low achievers differently. This study is one of very few that uses a large-scale longitudinal design to track how early factors predict students' mathematical performance across the two ends of the achievement continuum over eight years. The findings add to the existing literature that cognitive factors predict mathematical competencies differently across developmental time, and that there are some common and unique predictors of performance at the two ends of the achievement continuum. The outcomes of the study inform educators that fine motor skills, basic reading skills, and number sense are likely to be important fundamental skills for early mathematical development, which may have a carry-effect on both mathematical success and failure in late primary school. Visuospatial working memory and basic reading skills are likely to be particularly important to prevent students from falling behind, whereas logical reasoning skills appear to be particularly important for mathematically talented students.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"116 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102570\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024001638\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024001638","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了幼儿园领域一般因素和特定领域因素、小学一年级(P1)数学技能和社会经济地位(SES)如何预测小学六年级(P6)数学能力的高低(前13百分位和后13百分位)。四百零七名小六学生之前完成了这些测量。逻辑路径分析显示,社会经济地位、小学一年级数学和流体智力对小学六年级高成就组的成员资格有直接的显著影响。视觉空间工作记忆、社会经济地位、阅读和 P1 数学对 P6 低成绩组的成员有直接影响。数感、精细动作技能和阅读通过 P1 数学对两个小组的成员资格都有间接影响。在执行功能和言语工作记忆方面没有发现明显的影响。研究结果表明,不同成绩的学生在数学能力上存在质的差异。研究的教育意义和影响数学能力对未来的学业成功和生活质量起着至关重要的作用,同时也为从事 STEM 学科和职业提供了基础知识。虽然我们知道有一些早期认知和环境因素可以预测未来的数学成绩,但对于这些因素是否会对数学成绩优秀和数学成绩较差的学生产生不同的影响却知之甚少。这项研究是为数不多的采用大规模纵向设计来追踪早期因素如何预测学生八年来在成绩连续体两端的数学表现的研究之一。研究结果补充了现有的文献,即认知因素在不同的发展时期对数学能力的预测是不同的,在成绩连续体的两端有一些共同的和独特的预测因素。研究结果告诉教育工作者,精细动作技能、基本阅读技能和数感可能是早期数学发展的重要基本技能,可能对小学后期的数学成败产生影响。视觉空间工作记忆和基本阅读技能可能对防止学生落后尤为重要,而逻辑推理技能似乎对有数学天赋的学生尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The highs and lows of mathematical ability: Shared and distinct longitudinal predictors of mathematical ability grouping
The current study examines how kindergarten domain-general and domain-specific factors, mathematical skills at primary 1 (P1), and socioeconomic status (SES) predict high versus low (top and bottom 13th percentile) mathematical ability at primary 6 (P6). Four-hundred-and-seven P6 students had previously completed the measures. Logistic path analyses showed that SES, P1 mathematics, and fluid intelligence showed direct significant effects on P6 high achievement group membership. Visuospatial working memory, SES, reading, and P1 mathematics showed direct effects on P6 low group membership. Number sense, fine motor skills, and reading demonstrated indirect effects on both group memberships through P1 mathematics. No significant effect was found for executive functioning or verbal working memory. Findings suggest that there is a qualitative difference in mathematical ability across the performance spectrum. Assessment and instruction should be differentiated to account for predictors that are specific to either end of the ability spectrum.

Educational relevance and implications of the research

Mathematical ability plays a critical role in future academic success and quality of life, and also provides the foundational knowledge for engagement in STEM school subjects and careers. While we know there are some early cognitive and environmental factors that predict future mathematical outcomes, little is known about whether they predict both mathematical high and low achievers differently. This study is one of very few that uses a large-scale longitudinal design to track how early factors predict students' mathematical performance across the two ends of the achievement continuum over eight years. The findings add to the existing literature that cognitive factors predict mathematical competencies differently across developmental time, and that there are some common and unique predictors of performance at the two ends of the achievement continuum. The outcomes of the study inform educators that fine motor skills, basic reading skills, and number sense are likely to be important fundamental skills for early mathematical development, which may have a carry-effect on both mathematical success and failure in late primary school. Visuospatial working memory and basic reading skills are likely to be particularly important to prevent students from falling behind, whereas logical reasoning skills appear to be particularly important for mathematically talented students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信