你只想着回家":探索出院时与老年患者进行以人为本的用药沟通

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Henrik Cam, Kristin Franzon, Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong, Thomas Gerardus Hendrik Kempen, Cecilia Bernsten, Elisabet I. Nielsen, Lovisa Gustavsson, Elnaz Moosavi, Stina Lindmark, Ulf Ehlin, Maria Sjölander, Karl-Johan Lindner, Ulrika Gillespie
{"title":"你只想着回家\":探索出院时与老年患者进行以人为本的用药沟通","authors":"Henrik Cam,&nbsp;Kristin Franzon,&nbsp;Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong,&nbsp;Thomas Gerardus Hendrik Kempen,&nbsp;Cecilia Bernsten,&nbsp;Elisabet I. Nielsen,&nbsp;Lovisa Gustavsson,&nbsp;Elnaz Moosavi,&nbsp;Stina Lindmark,&nbsp;Ulf Ehlin,&nbsp;Maria Sjölander,&nbsp;Karl-Johan Lindner,&nbsp;Ulrika Gillespie","doi":"10.1111/hex.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The hospital discharge process poses significant safety risks for older patients due to complexities in communication and coordination among stakeholders, leading to potential drug-related problems post-discharge. Adopting a person-centred care (PCC) approach in medication communication by healthcare professionals (HCPs) is crucial to ensure positive health outcomes. This study aimed to explore the practice of PCC in medication communication between older patients and HCPs during the hospital discharge process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a qualitative study using non-participatory direct observations of patient–HCP consultations during hospital discharge, followed by semi-structured interviews with observed patients and, when applicable, their informal caregivers. Data collection occurred from October 2020 to May 2021 at two Swedish hospitals. We gathered data using an observational form and audio-recorded all consultations and interviews. The data were analysed thematically using the systematic text condensation method.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty patients were included (median age: 81 years [range: 65–94]; 9 female) in observations and 13 of them participated in interviews. Two patients were accompanied by an informal caregiver during the interviews. Three main themes were identified: (1) <i>The impact of traditional authoritarian structures</i>, depicts power dynamics between patients and their HCPs, showing how traditional structures influence the practice of PCC in medication communication during hospital discharge; (2) <i>Consultation timing and mode not on patients' terms</i>, describes suboptimal times and settings for consultations, along with the use of complex language that hinders effective communication; and (3) <i>Discrepancy in expectations of self-care ability</i>, illustrates a mismatch between the self-care guidance provided by HCPs during hospital discharge and the actual needs and preferences of patients and informal caregivers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Medication communication between older patients and HCPs during hospital discharge is frequently inconsistent with the practice of PCC. Not only must HCPs improve their communication strategies, but patients and their informal caregivers should also be better prepared for discharge communication and encouraged to participate in their care. This involvement would give them relevant knowledge and tailor communication to their individual needs, preventing problems in managing their medications after discharge.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>An advisory group of six patients and/or informal caregiver contributors provided input on the study design, edited the consent forms, and helped develop the interview guide.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘You're Just Thinking About Going Home’: Exploring Person-Centred Medication Communication With Older Patients at Hospital Discharge\",\"authors\":\"Henrik Cam,&nbsp;Kristin Franzon,&nbsp;Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong,&nbsp;Thomas Gerardus Hendrik Kempen,&nbsp;Cecilia Bernsten,&nbsp;Elisabet I. Nielsen,&nbsp;Lovisa Gustavsson,&nbsp;Elnaz Moosavi,&nbsp;Stina Lindmark,&nbsp;Ulf Ehlin,&nbsp;Maria Sjölander,&nbsp;Karl-Johan Lindner,&nbsp;Ulrika Gillespie\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hex.70065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The hospital discharge process poses significant safety risks for older patients due to complexities in communication and coordination among stakeholders, leading to potential drug-related problems post-discharge. Adopting a person-centred care (PCC) approach in medication communication by healthcare professionals (HCPs) is crucial to ensure positive health outcomes. This study aimed to explore the practice of PCC in medication communication between older patients and HCPs during the hospital discharge process.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a qualitative study using non-participatory direct observations of patient–HCP consultations during hospital discharge, followed by semi-structured interviews with observed patients and, when applicable, their informal caregivers. Data collection occurred from October 2020 to May 2021 at two Swedish hospitals. We gathered data using an observational form and audio-recorded all consultations and interviews. The data were analysed thematically using the systematic text condensation method.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty patients were included (median age: 81 years [range: 65–94]; 9 female) in observations and 13 of them participated in interviews. Two patients were accompanied by an informal caregiver during the interviews. Three main themes were identified: (1) <i>The impact of traditional authoritarian structures</i>, depicts power dynamics between patients and their HCPs, showing how traditional structures influence the practice of PCC in medication communication during hospital discharge; (2) <i>Consultation timing and mode not on patients' terms</i>, describes suboptimal times and settings for consultations, along with the use of complex language that hinders effective communication; and (3) <i>Discrepancy in expectations of self-care ability</i>, illustrates a mismatch between the self-care guidance provided by HCPs during hospital discharge and the actual needs and preferences of patients and informal caregivers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Medication communication between older patients and HCPs during hospital discharge is frequently inconsistent with the practice of PCC. Not only must HCPs improve their communication strategies, but patients and their informal caregivers should also be better prepared for discharge communication and encouraged to participate in their care. This involvement would give them relevant knowledge and tailor communication to their individual needs, preventing problems in managing their medications after discharge.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>An advisory group of six patients and/or informal caregiver contributors provided input on the study design, edited the consent forms, and helped develop the interview guide.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Expectations\",\"volume\":\"27 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70065\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Expectations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70065\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 由于利益相关者之间的沟通和协调十分复杂,出院过程对老年患者构成了巨大的安全风险,导致出院后可能出现与药物相关的问题。医护人员在用药沟通中采用以人为本的护理(PCC)方法对于确保积极的健康结果至关重要。本研究旨在探讨老年患者在出院过程中与医护人员进行药物沟通时的 PCC 实践。 方法 我们采用非参与式方法对出院期间患者与医护人员之间的咨询进行直接观察,然后对观察到的患者及其非正式护理人员(如适用)进行半结构式访谈,从而开展了一项定性研究。数据收集工作于 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 5 月在两家瑞典医院进行。我们使用观察表收集数据,并对所有咨询和访谈进行录音。我们采用系统文本浓缩法对数据进行了专题分析。 结果 20 名患者(中位年龄:81 岁[范围:65-94 岁];9 名女性)参加了观察,其中 13 人参加了访谈。有两名患者在非正式护理人员的陪同下参加了访谈。研究确定了三大主题(1) 传统专制结构的影响,描述了患者与保健医生之间的权力动态,显示了传统结构如何影响出院期间药物沟通中的 PCC 实践;(2) 咨询时间和方式不符合患者的条件,描述了咨询的次优时间和环境,以及使用阻碍有效沟通的复杂语言;以及 (3) 对自我护理能力的期望不一致,说明了保健医生在出院期间提供的自我护理指导与患者和非正式护理人员的实际需求和偏好之间的不匹配。 结论 老年患者出院时与医护人员之间的用药沟通往往与 PCC 的实践不一致。不仅医护人员必须改进沟通策略,患者及其非正规护理人员也应为出院沟通做好更充分的准备,并鼓励他们参与护理工作。这种参与可以让他们了解相关知识,并根据个人需要进行沟通,从而避免出院后在管理药物方面出现问题。 患者或公众的贡献 由六名患者和/或非正式护理人员组成的顾问小组为研究设计提供了意见,编辑了同意书,并帮助制定了访谈指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘You're Just Thinking About Going Home’: Exploring Person-Centred Medication Communication With Older Patients at Hospital Discharge

Background

The hospital discharge process poses significant safety risks for older patients due to complexities in communication and coordination among stakeholders, leading to potential drug-related problems post-discharge. Adopting a person-centred care (PCC) approach in medication communication by healthcare professionals (HCPs) is crucial to ensure positive health outcomes. This study aimed to explore the practice of PCC in medication communication between older patients and HCPs during the hospital discharge process.

Methods

We conducted a qualitative study using non-participatory direct observations of patient–HCP consultations during hospital discharge, followed by semi-structured interviews with observed patients and, when applicable, their informal caregivers. Data collection occurred from October 2020 to May 2021 at two Swedish hospitals. We gathered data using an observational form and audio-recorded all consultations and interviews. The data were analysed thematically using the systematic text condensation method.

Results

Twenty patients were included (median age: 81 years [range: 65–94]; 9 female) in observations and 13 of them participated in interviews. Two patients were accompanied by an informal caregiver during the interviews. Three main themes were identified: (1) The impact of traditional authoritarian structures, depicts power dynamics between patients and their HCPs, showing how traditional structures influence the practice of PCC in medication communication during hospital discharge; (2) Consultation timing and mode not on patients' terms, describes suboptimal times and settings for consultations, along with the use of complex language that hinders effective communication; and (3) Discrepancy in expectations of self-care ability, illustrates a mismatch between the self-care guidance provided by HCPs during hospital discharge and the actual needs and preferences of patients and informal caregivers.

Conclusion

Medication communication between older patients and HCPs during hospital discharge is frequently inconsistent with the practice of PCC. Not only must HCPs improve their communication strategies, but patients and their informal caregivers should also be better prepared for discharge communication and encouraged to participate in their care. This involvement would give them relevant knowledge and tailor communication to their individual needs, preventing problems in managing their medications after discharge.

Patient or Public Contribution

An advisory group of six patients and/or informal caregiver contributors provided input on the study design, edited the consent forms, and helped develop the interview guide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信