基于水库的洪水预报和预警:深度学习与机器学习

IF 5.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 WATER RESOURCES
Sooyeon Yi, Jaeeung Yi
{"title":"基于水库的洪水预报和预警:深度学习与机器学习","authors":"Sooyeon Yi,&nbsp;Jaeeung Yi","doi":"10.1007/s13201-024-02298-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In response to increasing flood risks driven by the climate crisis, urban areas require advanced forecasting and informed decision-making to support sustainable development. This study seeks to improve the reliability of reservoir-based flood forecasting and ensure adequate lead time for effective response measures. The main objectives are to predict hourly downstream flood discharge at a reference point, compare discharge predictions from a single reservoir with a four-hour lead time against those from three reservoirs with a seven-hour lead time, and evaluate the accuracy of data-driven approaches. The study takes place in the Han River Basin, located in Seoul, South Korea. Approaches include two non-deep learning (NDL) (random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR)) and two deep learning (DL) (long short-term memory (LSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU)). Scenario 1 incorporates data from three reservoirs, while Scenario 2 focuses solely on Paldang reservoir. Results show that RF performed 4.03% (in <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) better than SVR, while GRU performed 4.69% (in <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) better than LSTM in Scenario 1. In Scenario 2, none of the models showed any outstanding performance. Based on these findings, we propose a two-step reservoir-based approach: Initial predictions should utilize models for three upstream reservoirs with long lead time, while closer to the event, the model should focus on a single reservoir with more accurate prediction. This work stands as a significant contribution, making accurate and well-timed predictions for the local administrations to issue flood warnings and execute evacuations to mitigate flood damage and casualties in urban areas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8374,"journal":{"name":"Applied Water Science","volume":"14 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-024-02298-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reservoir-based flood forecasting and warning: deep learning versus machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Sooyeon Yi,&nbsp;Jaeeung Yi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13201-024-02298-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In response to increasing flood risks driven by the climate crisis, urban areas require advanced forecasting and informed decision-making to support sustainable development. This study seeks to improve the reliability of reservoir-based flood forecasting and ensure adequate lead time for effective response measures. The main objectives are to predict hourly downstream flood discharge at a reference point, compare discharge predictions from a single reservoir with a four-hour lead time against those from three reservoirs with a seven-hour lead time, and evaluate the accuracy of data-driven approaches. The study takes place in the Han River Basin, located in Seoul, South Korea. Approaches include two non-deep learning (NDL) (random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR)) and two deep learning (DL) (long short-term memory (LSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU)). Scenario 1 incorporates data from three reservoirs, while Scenario 2 focuses solely on Paldang reservoir. Results show that RF performed 4.03% (in <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) better than SVR, while GRU performed 4.69% (in <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) better than LSTM in Scenario 1. In Scenario 2, none of the models showed any outstanding performance. Based on these findings, we propose a two-step reservoir-based approach: Initial predictions should utilize models for three upstream reservoirs with long lead time, while closer to the event, the model should focus on a single reservoir with more accurate prediction. This work stands as a significant contribution, making accurate and well-timed predictions for the local administrations to issue flood warnings and execute evacuations to mitigate flood damage and casualties in urban areas.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Water Science\",\"volume\":\"14 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-024-02298-w.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Water Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-024-02298-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Water Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-024-02298-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为应对气候危机导致的日益增加的洪水风险,城市地区需要先进的预报和明智的决策,以支持可持续发展。本研究旨在提高基于水库的洪水预报的可靠性,确保有足够的准备时间采取有效的应对措施。主要目标是预测参考点的每小时下游泄洪量,比较一座水库在 4 小时准备时间内的泄洪预测与三座水库在 7 小时准备时间内的泄洪预测,并评估数据驱动方法的准确性。研究地点位于韩国首尔的汉江流域。方法包括两种非深度学习 (NDL)(随机森林 (RF)、支持向量回归 (SVR))和两种深度学习 (DL)(长短期记忆 (LSTM)、门控递归单元 (GRU))。方案 1 结合了三个水库的数据,而方案 2 则只关注帕尔当水库。结果表明,在情景 1 中,RF 的性能(R2)比 SVR 高 4.03%,而 GRU 的性能(R2)比 LSTM 高 4.69%。在情景 2 中,没有一个模型表现出突出的性能。基于这些发现,我们提出了一种基于水库的两步法:最初的预测应利用三个上游水库的模型,提前期较长,而在临近事件发生时,模型应专注于单个水库,预测更准确。这项工作是一项重大贡献,为地方政府发布洪水预警和实施疏散提供了准确及时的预测,从而减轻了洪水对城市地区造成的破坏和人员伤亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reservoir-based flood forecasting and warning: deep learning versus machine learning

Reservoir-based flood forecasting and warning: deep learning versus machine learning

In response to increasing flood risks driven by the climate crisis, urban areas require advanced forecasting and informed decision-making to support sustainable development. This study seeks to improve the reliability of reservoir-based flood forecasting and ensure adequate lead time for effective response measures. The main objectives are to predict hourly downstream flood discharge at a reference point, compare discharge predictions from a single reservoir with a four-hour lead time against those from three reservoirs with a seven-hour lead time, and evaluate the accuracy of data-driven approaches. The study takes place in the Han River Basin, located in Seoul, South Korea. Approaches include two non-deep learning (NDL) (random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR)) and two deep learning (DL) (long short-term memory (LSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU)). Scenario 1 incorporates data from three reservoirs, while Scenario 2 focuses solely on Paldang reservoir. Results show that RF performed 4.03% (in R2) better than SVR, while GRU performed 4.69% (in R2) better than LSTM in Scenario 1. In Scenario 2, none of the models showed any outstanding performance. Based on these findings, we propose a two-step reservoir-based approach: Initial predictions should utilize models for three upstream reservoirs with long lead time, while closer to the event, the model should focus on a single reservoir with more accurate prediction. This work stands as a significant contribution, making accurate and well-timed predictions for the local administrations to issue flood warnings and execute evacuations to mitigate flood damage and casualties in urban areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Water Science
Applied Water Science WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信