热带气候条件下超市冷热能储存的热经济学研究与各种储存方案

IF 3.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Andi Abdul Halik Lateko, Akhmad Faruq Alhikami, Yusri Syam Akil, Nur Hazirah Zaini, Afthon Ilman Huda Isyfi, Riswan Sepriyatno
{"title":"热带气候条件下超市冷热能储存的热经济学研究与各种储存方案","authors":"Andi Abdul Halik Lateko,&nbsp;Akhmad Faruq Alhikami,&nbsp;Yusri Syam Akil,&nbsp;Nur Hazirah Zaini,&nbsp;Afthon Ilman Huda Isyfi,&nbsp;Riswan Sepriyatno","doi":"10.1007/s12053-024-10274-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, ten different cold thermal energy storage (CTES) scenarios were investigated using thermodynamic and economic analyses and compared to the direct cooling system in a supermarket. The energy analysis of CTES system was carried out to predict its behavior during the charging and discharging phases. The coefficient of performance (COP) of the chiller was determined for all CTES designs on an hourly basis, considering the ambient temperature profiles of the local climate. A daily energy analysis, and an annual savings analysis were conducted for the whole system. The daily electricity tariffs of CTES scenarios decreased compared to the direct cooling system as storage capacity increased, leading to higher annual profits and a reduction in the payback period. It was found that eliminating chiller operation during peak hours in all CTES designs increases system capacity and CTES volume, which in turn raises net energy consumption and initial capital costs. However, this approach results in significant annual savings, despite a rise in service costs, and remains more beneficial compared to running the chiller 24 h a day. Overall, the leveling storage off-peak mode proved to be the optimal CTES design, offering substantial annual savings and the shortest payback period of six years, without requiring significant modifications to the existing chiller plant.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"17 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermo-economic study of cold thermal energy storage with various storage scenarios in a supermarket located in tropical climates\",\"authors\":\"Andi Abdul Halik Lateko,&nbsp;Akhmad Faruq Alhikami,&nbsp;Yusri Syam Akil,&nbsp;Nur Hazirah Zaini,&nbsp;Afthon Ilman Huda Isyfi,&nbsp;Riswan Sepriyatno\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12053-024-10274-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, ten different cold thermal energy storage (CTES) scenarios were investigated using thermodynamic and economic analyses and compared to the direct cooling system in a supermarket. The energy analysis of CTES system was carried out to predict its behavior during the charging and discharging phases. The coefficient of performance (COP) of the chiller was determined for all CTES designs on an hourly basis, considering the ambient temperature profiles of the local climate. A daily energy analysis, and an annual savings analysis were conducted for the whole system. The daily electricity tariffs of CTES scenarios decreased compared to the direct cooling system as storage capacity increased, leading to higher annual profits and a reduction in the payback period. It was found that eliminating chiller operation during peak hours in all CTES designs increases system capacity and CTES volume, which in turn raises net energy consumption and initial capital costs. However, this approach results in significant annual savings, despite a rise in service costs, and remains more beneficial compared to running the chiller 24 h a day. Overall, the leveling storage off-peak mode proved to be the optimal CTES design, offering substantial annual savings and the shortest payback period of six years, without requiring significant modifications to the existing chiller plant.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Efficiency\",\"volume\":\"17 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Efficiency\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-024-10274-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Efficiency","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-024-10274-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,利用热力学和经济分析对十种不同的冷热能储存(CTES)方案进行了调查,并与超市中的直接冷却系统进行了比较。对 CTES 系统进行了能量分析,以预测其在充电和放电阶段的行为。考虑到当地气候的环境温度曲线,以小时为单位确定了所有 CTES 设计的冷却器性能系数(COP)。对整个系统进行了日常能源分析和年度节约分析。与直接冷却系统相比,随着存储容量的增加,CTES 方案的日电费有所下降,从而提高了年利润并缩短了投资回收期。研究发现,在所有 CTES 设计中,取消高峰时段的冷却器运行会增加系统容量和 CTES 容量,从而提高净能耗和初始资本成本。不过,尽管服务成本上升,但这种方法每年仍能节省大量费用,而且与每天 24 小时运行冷水机组相比,这种方法仍然更为有利。总之,事实证明平准存储非高峰模式是最佳的 CTES 设计,每年可节省大量能源,投资回收期最短为 6 年,且无需对现有冷水机组进行重大改造。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Thermo-economic study of cold thermal energy storage with various storage scenarios in a supermarket located in tropical climates

Thermo-economic study of cold thermal energy storage with various storage scenarios in a supermarket located in tropical climates

In this study, ten different cold thermal energy storage (CTES) scenarios were investigated using thermodynamic and economic analyses and compared to the direct cooling system in a supermarket. The energy analysis of CTES system was carried out to predict its behavior during the charging and discharging phases. The coefficient of performance (COP) of the chiller was determined for all CTES designs on an hourly basis, considering the ambient temperature profiles of the local climate. A daily energy analysis, and an annual savings analysis were conducted for the whole system. The daily electricity tariffs of CTES scenarios decreased compared to the direct cooling system as storage capacity increased, leading to higher annual profits and a reduction in the payback period. It was found that eliminating chiller operation during peak hours in all CTES designs increases system capacity and CTES volume, which in turn raises net energy consumption and initial capital costs. However, this approach results in significant annual savings, despite a rise in service costs, and remains more beneficial compared to running the chiller 24 h a day. Overall, the leveling storage off-peak mode proved to be the optimal CTES design, offering substantial annual savings and the shortest payback period of six years, without requiring significant modifications to the existing chiller plant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Efficiency
Energy Efficiency ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Efficiency covers wide-ranging aspects of energy efficiency in the residential, tertiary, industrial and transport sectors. Coverage includes a number of different topics and disciplines including energy efficiency policies at local, regional, national and international levels; long term impact of energy efficiency; technologies to improve energy efficiency; consumer behavior and the dynamics of consumption; socio-economic impacts of energy efficiency measures; energy efficiency as a virtual utility; transportation issues; building issues; energy management systems and energy services; energy planning and risk assessment; energy efficiency in developing countries and economies in transition; non-energy benefits of energy efficiency and opportunities for policy integration; energy education and training, and emerging technologies. See Aims and Scope for more details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信