按产品类型、剂量大小和生物碱含量,通过生态瞬间评估了解克瑞托姆效果的时间进程

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Kirsten E. Smith , Leigh V. Panlilio , Abhisheak Sharma , Christopher R. McCurdy , Jeffrey D. Feldman , Sushobhan Mukhopadhyay , Siva Rama Raju Kanumuri , Michelle A. Kuntz , Katherine Hill , David H. Epstein
{"title":"按产品类型、剂量大小和生物碱含量,通过生态瞬间评估了解克瑞托姆效果的时间进程","authors":"Kirsten E. Smith ,&nbsp;Leigh V. Panlilio ,&nbsp;Abhisheak Sharma ,&nbsp;Christopher R. McCurdy ,&nbsp;Jeffrey D. Feldman ,&nbsp;Sushobhan Mukhopadhyay ,&nbsp;Siva Rama Raju Kanumuri ,&nbsp;Michelle A. Kuntz ,&nbsp;Katherine Hill ,&nbsp;David H. Epstein","doi":"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), we undertook a natural experiment wherein kratom-product variability was a tool to assess kratom dose-response relationships based on product form and alkaloid level.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between July-November 2022, 357 US kratom consumers (56.6 % male, 90.2 % non-Hispanic white) completed 15 days of EMA; 348 participants submitted samples of the products used most often during EMA. These were assayed for ten alkaloids using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Self-reported kratom effects were modeled as a function of kratom amount and alkaloid content.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants used over 220 brands. The most-reported product forms were loose powder (55.8 %) and encapsulated powder (26.8 %); extracts were used less (419 uses across 9.48 % of participants). Of the 12,244 use-event entries, 7726 had follow-up data (15–180<!--> <!-->minutes after use) on felt effects. Effects were stronger in participants with a higher average amount per use. Within-person dose-response relationships were obscured by highly-consistent within-person dosages. Effects of loose powder decreased over three hours; effects of extracts started higher but decreased more rapidly. Dose-response relationships for specific alkaloids could not be reliably established because total alkaloid content and relative levels of specific alkaloids showed limited variability between products. Higher levels of corynoxine alkaloids were associated with slightly stronger effects, possibly an artifact of modeling data with low alkaloid variability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Alkaloid content was surprisingly consistent across kratom products, and participants were consistent in the amount they used across events. Firm conclusions about alkaloid-effect relationships for kratom will require experimenter-controlled manipulations of agent and dose.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11322,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence","volume":"264 ","pages":"Article 112460"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time course of kratom effects via ecological momentary assessment, by product type, dose amount, and assayed alkaloid content\",\"authors\":\"Kirsten E. Smith ,&nbsp;Leigh V. Panlilio ,&nbsp;Abhisheak Sharma ,&nbsp;Christopher R. McCurdy ,&nbsp;Jeffrey D. Feldman ,&nbsp;Sushobhan Mukhopadhyay ,&nbsp;Siva Rama Raju Kanumuri ,&nbsp;Michelle A. Kuntz ,&nbsp;Katherine Hill ,&nbsp;David H. Epstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), we undertook a natural experiment wherein kratom-product variability was a tool to assess kratom dose-response relationships based on product form and alkaloid level.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between July-November 2022, 357 US kratom consumers (56.6 % male, 90.2 % non-Hispanic white) completed 15 days of EMA; 348 participants submitted samples of the products used most often during EMA. These were assayed for ten alkaloids using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Self-reported kratom effects were modeled as a function of kratom amount and alkaloid content.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants used over 220 brands. The most-reported product forms were loose powder (55.8 %) and encapsulated powder (26.8 %); extracts were used less (419 uses across 9.48 % of participants). Of the 12,244 use-event entries, 7726 had follow-up data (15–180<!--> <!-->minutes after use) on felt effects. Effects were stronger in participants with a higher average amount per use. Within-person dose-response relationships were obscured by highly-consistent within-person dosages. Effects of loose powder decreased over three hours; effects of extracts started higher but decreased more rapidly. Dose-response relationships for specific alkaloids could not be reliably established because total alkaloid content and relative levels of specific alkaloids showed limited variability between products. Higher levels of corynoxine alkaloids were associated with slightly stronger effects, possibly an artifact of modeling data with low alkaloid variability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Alkaloid content was surprisingly consistent across kratom products, and participants were consistent in the amount they used across events. Firm conclusions about alkaloid-effect relationships for kratom will require experimenter-controlled manipulations of agent and dose.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and alcohol dependence\",\"volume\":\"264 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112460\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and alcohol dependence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871624013851\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871624013851","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的利用生态瞬间评估(EMA),我们进行了一项自然实验,以桔梗产品的变异性为工具,评估基于产品形式和生物碱水平的桔梗剂量-反应关系。方法2022年7月至11月,357名美国桔梗消费者(56.6%为男性,90.2%为非西班牙裔白人)完成了为期15天的生态瞬间评估;348名参与者提交了生态瞬间评估期间最常使用的产品样本。采用超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法对这些样本中的十种生物碱进行了检测。结果参与者使用了 220 多种品牌的产品。报告最多的产品形式是散装粉末(55.8%)和封装粉末(26.8%);提取物使用较少(419 次,占参与者的 9.48%)。在 12244 个使用事件条目中,有 7726 个条目提供了关于感觉效果的后续数据(使用后 15-180 分钟)。平均每次使用量较高的参与者感觉更强烈。人与人之间的剂量-反应关系因人与人之间的剂量高度一致而变得模糊。散粉的药效在三小时内减弱;提取物的药效开始时较高,但减弱得更快。由于总生物碱含量和特定生物碱的相对含量在不同产品之间的差异有限,因此无法可靠地确定特定生物碱的剂量-反应关系。较高含量的堇菜碱与稍强的效果相关,这可能是生物碱变异性较低的建模数据的假象。关于桔梗生物碱效应关系的确切结论需要实验者对药剂和剂量进行控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time course of kratom effects via ecological momentary assessment, by product type, dose amount, and assayed alkaloid content

Background and aims

Using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), we undertook a natural experiment wherein kratom-product variability was a tool to assess kratom dose-response relationships based on product form and alkaloid level.

Methods

Between July-November 2022, 357 US kratom consumers (56.6 % male, 90.2 % non-Hispanic white) completed 15 days of EMA; 348 participants submitted samples of the products used most often during EMA. These were assayed for ten alkaloids using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Self-reported kratom effects were modeled as a function of kratom amount and alkaloid content.

Results

Participants used over 220 brands. The most-reported product forms were loose powder (55.8 %) and encapsulated powder (26.8 %); extracts were used less (419 uses across 9.48 % of participants). Of the 12,244 use-event entries, 7726 had follow-up data (15–180 minutes after use) on felt effects. Effects were stronger in participants with a higher average amount per use. Within-person dose-response relationships were obscured by highly-consistent within-person dosages. Effects of loose powder decreased over three hours; effects of extracts started higher but decreased more rapidly. Dose-response relationships for specific alkaloids could not be reliably established because total alkaloid content and relative levels of specific alkaloids showed limited variability between products. Higher levels of corynoxine alkaloids were associated with slightly stronger effects, possibly an artifact of modeling data with low alkaloid variability.

Conclusions

Alkaloid content was surprisingly consistent across kratom products, and participants were consistent in the amount they used across events. Firm conclusions about alkaloid-effect relationships for kratom will require experimenter-controlled manipulations of agent and dose.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence
Drug and alcohol dependence 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
409
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Dependence is an international journal devoted to publishing original research, scholarly reviews, commentaries, and policy analyses in the area of drug, alcohol and tobacco use and dependence. Articles range from studies of the chemistry of substances of abuse, their actions at molecular and cellular sites, in vitro and in vivo investigations of their biochemical, pharmacological and behavioural actions, laboratory-based and clinical research in humans, substance abuse treatment and prevention research, and studies employing methods from epidemiology, sociology, and economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信