Grigorios Tsinidis , Sotiria Stefanidou , Anna Karatzetzou
{"title":"圆形隧道地震脆性评估的新极限状态:在粘性土隧道中的应用","authors":"Grigorios Tsinidis , Sotiria Stefanidou , Anna Karatzetzou","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2024.106129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper introduces a novel framework to define limit states for the seismic fragility assessment of circular tunnels in soil. A numerical framework is developed for this purpose, focusing on the response of tunnels subjected to ground seismic shaking in the transverse direction. New limit states are defined based on the ovaling deformation of the tunnel, corresponding to different levels of liner stiffness degradation caused by seismic shaking. The latter is evaluated via nonlinear static pushover analyses of the examined ground-tunnel configurations. Nonlinear dynamic analyses are performed to evaluate the demand of examined tunnels and develop Probabilistic Seismic Demand Models (PSDMs). The uncertainties related with the definitions of capacity and demand are thoroughly evaluated based on the results of the nonlinear static pushover and dynamic analyses, respectively. The proposed framework is applied to a 6 m diameter circular tunnel embedded in uniform clayey soil deposit at a burial depth of 15 m. Various assumptions are made regarding the thickness and mechanical properties of the liner and the soil, leading to the investigation of 27 ground-tunnel configurations. A suite of ground motions is selected to perform dynamic analyses of each examined configuration. Based on the results of the analyses new PSDMs and <em>PGA</em>-based fragility functions are derived. Comparisons of the proposed fragility curves with existing, empirical, and analytical fragility curves for tunnels, reveal differences, which in some cases are significant and are mainly attributed to the different definitions of Engineering Demand Parameters (EDPs) and limit states between the compared curves, as well as to different assumptions in the analytical frameworks proposed by various studies. The proposed framework may be applied to other ground-tunnel configurations to develop fragility functions for a more rigorous risk and resilience assessment of these types of systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"154 ","pages":"Article 106129"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New limit states for the seismic fragility assessment of circular tunnels: Application in case of tunnels in clayey soil deposits\",\"authors\":\"Grigorios Tsinidis , Sotiria Stefanidou , Anna Karatzetzou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tust.2024.106129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper introduces a novel framework to define limit states for the seismic fragility assessment of circular tunnels in soil. A numerical framework is developed for this purpose, focusing on the response of tunnels subjected to ground seismic shaking in the transverse direction. New limit states are defined based on the ovaling deformation of the tunnel, corresponding to different levels of liner stiffness degradation caused by seismic shaking. The latter is evaluated via nonlinear static pushover analyses of the examined ground-tunnel configurations. Nonlinear dynamic analyses are performed to evaluate the demand of examined tunnels and develop Probabilistic Seismic Demand Models (PSDMs). The uncertainties related with the definitions of capacity and demand are thoroughly evaluated based on the results of the nonlinear static pushover and dynamic analyses, respectively. The proposed framework is applied to a 6 m diameter circular tunnel embedded in uniform clayey soil deposit at a burial depth of 15 m. Various assumptions are made regarding the thickness and mechanical properties of the liner and the soil, leading to the investigation of 27 ground-tunnel configurations. A suite of ground motions is selected to perform dynamic analyses of each examined configuration. Based on the results of the analyses new PSDMs and <em>PGA</em>-based fragility functions are derived. Comparisons of the proposed fragility curves with existing, empirical, and analytical fragility curves for tunnels, reveal differences, which in some cases are significant and are mainly attributed to the different definitions of Engineering Demand Parameters (EDPs) and limit states between the compared curves, as well as to different assumptions in the analytical frameworks proposed by various studies. The proposed framework may be applied to other ground-tunnel configurations to develop fragility functions for a more rigorous risk and resilience assessment of these types of systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"volume\":\"154 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779824005479\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779824005479","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
New limit states for the seismic fragility assessment of circular tunnels: Application in case of tunnels in clayey soil deposits
This paper introduces a novel framework to define limit states for the seismic fragility assessment of circular tunnels in soil. A numerical framework is developed for this purpose, focusing on the response of tunnels subjected to ground seismic shaking in the transverse direction. New limit states are defined based on the ovaling deformation of the tunnel, corresponding to different levels of liner stiffness degradation caused by seismic shaking. The latter is evaluated via nonlinear static pushover analyses of the examined ground-tunnel configurations. Nonlinear dynamic analyses are performed to evaluate the demand of examined tunnels and develop Probabilistic Seismic Demand Models (PSDMs). The uncertainties related with the definitions of capacity and demand are thoroughly evaluated based on the results of the nonlinear static pushover and dynamic analyses, respectively. The proposed framework is applied to a 6 m diameter circular tunnel embedded in uniform clayey soil deposit at a burial depth of 15 m. Various assumptions are made regarding the thickness and mechanical properties of the liner and the soil, leading to the investigation of 27 ground-tunnel configurations. A suite of ground motions is selected to perform dynamic analyses of each examined configuration. Based on the results of the analyses new PSDMs and PGA-based fragility functions are derived. Comparisons of the proposed fragility curves with existing, empirical, and analytical fragility curves for tunnels, reveal differences, which in some cases are significant and are mainly attributed to the different definitions of Engineering Demand Parameters (EDPs) and limit states between the compared curves, as well as to different assumptions in the analytical frameworks proposed by various studies. The proposed framework may be applied to other ground-tunnel configurations to develop fragility functions for a more rigorous risk and resilience assessment of these types of systems.
期刊介绍:
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.