等压压缩二氧化碳储能系统的综合热经济分析:改进热力学途径

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
{"title":"等压压缩二氧化碳储能系统的综合热经济分析:改进热力学途径","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mitigating fluctuations across multi-time scales is crucial for the large-scale integration of renewable energy, and compressed carbon dioxide energy storage (CCES) is one of the most promising technological pathways. To enhance the performance of CCES systems, this paper proposes an isobaric CO<sub>2</sub> storage device and constructs various charge–discharge pathways. Thermodynamic analyses are conducted from both process and system perspectives, and economic performance under different pathway combinations is investigated. The results indicate that the energy consumption for isobaric storage is significantly lower than the exergy destruction under isochoric storage. The compressed heat evaporation path can effectively reduce evaporation loss and achieves a charging efficiency of 73.56 %. The discharge path (D-path) coupled with waste heat can significantly increase system capacity, with discharge efficiency improving from 62.73 % to 70.68 %. Utilizing the ambient heat evaporation without external heat source, the optimal roundtrip efficiency is 53.42 % and the corresponding low storage pressure is 4.2 MPa. Moreover, under the combination of flash evaporation and external heat source, the system roundtrip efficiency decreases with promotion of the low storage pressure, and the optimal energy and exergy efficiencies of 42.83 % and 75.95 % can be achieved near the critical pressure. The integration of compression heat evaporation and external heat source offers the competitive economic performance, the levelized cost of unit electricity and payback period are 0.144$/kWh and 7.07 years by coupling with low-temperature waste heat at 400 K.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive thermo-economic analysis of an isobaric compressed CO2 energy storage system: Improvement of the thermodynamic pathway\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Mitigating fluctuations across multi-time scales is crucial for the large-scale integration of renewable energy, and compressed carbon dioxide energy storage (CCES) is one of the most promising technological pathways. To enhance the performance of CCES systems, this paper proposes an isobaric CO<sub>2</sub> storage device and constructs various charge–discharge pathways. Thermodynamic analyses are conducted from both process and system perspectives, and economic performance under different pathway combinations is investigated. The results indicate that the energy consumption for isobaric storage is significantly lower than the exergy destruction under isochoric storage. The compressed heat evaporation path can effectively reduce evaporation loss and achieves a charging efficiency of 73.56 %. The discharge path (D-path) coupled with waste heat can significantly increase system capacity, with discharge efficiency improving from 62.73 % to 70.68 %. Utilizing the ambient heat evaporation without external heat source, the optimal roundtrip efficiency is 53.42 % and the corresponding low storage pressure is 4.2 MPa. Moreover, under the combination of flash evaporation and external heat source, the system roundtrip efficiency decreases with promotion of the low storage pressure, and the optimal energy and exergy efficiencies of 42.83 % and 75.95 % can be achieved near the critical pressure. The integration of compression heat evaporation and external heat source offers the competitive economic performance, the levelized cost of unit electricity and payback period are 0.144$/kWh and 7.07 years by coupling with low-temperature waste heat at 400 K.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019689042401029X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019689042401029X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

减缓多时间尺度上的波动对于大规模集成可再生能源至关重要,而压缩二氧化碳储能(CCES)是最有前途的技术途径之一。为了提高 CCES 系统的性能,本文提出了一种等压二氧化碳储能装置,并构建了各种充放电途径。本文从过程和系统两个角度进行了热力学分析,并研究了不同路径组合下的经济性能。结果表明,等压贮存的能耗明显低于等时贮存的放能破坏。压缩热蒸发路径可有效减少蒸发损耗,充电效率达到 73.56%。放电路径(D-路径)与余热相结合,可大幅提高系统容量,放电效率从 62.73% 提高到 70.68%。在没有外部热源的情况下利用环境热蒸发,最佳往返效率为 53.42%,相应的低存储压力为 4.2 兆帕。此外,在闪蒸与外部热源相结合的情况下,系统往返效率随着低储存压力的升高而降低,在临界压力附近可达到 42.83 % 和 75.95 % 的最佳能量效率和放能效率。通过与 400 K 低温余热耦合,压缩热蒸发与外部热源的整合具有极具竞争力的经济效益,单位电量的平准化成本为 0.144 美元/千瓦时,投资回收期为 7.07 年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprehensive thermo-economic analysis of an isobaric compressed CO2 energy storage system: Improvement of the thermodynamic pathway
Mitigating fluctuations across multi-time scales is crucial for the large-scale integration of renewable energy, and compressed carbon dioxide energy storage (CCES) is one of the most promising technological pathways. To enhance the performance of CCES systems, this paper proposes an isobaric CO2 storage device and constructs various charge–discharge pathways. Thermodynamic analyses are conducted from both process and system perspectives, and economic performance under different pathway combinations is investigated. The results indicate that the energy consumption for isobaric storage is significantly lower than the exergy destruction under isochoric storage. The compressed heat evaporation path can effectively reduce evaporation loss and achieves a charging efficiency of 73.56 %. The discharge path (D-path) coupled with waste heat can significantly increase system capacity, with discharge efficiency improving from 62.73 % to 70.68 %. Utilizing the ambient heat evaporation without external heat source, the optimal roundtrip efficiency is 53.42 % and the corresponding low storage pressure is 4.2 MPa. Moreover, under the combination of flash evaporation and external heat source, the system roundtrip efficiency decreases with promotion of the low storage pressure, and the optimal energy and exergy efficiencies of 42.83 % and 75.95 % can be achieved near the critical pressure. The integration of compression heat evaporation and external heat source offers the competitive economic performance, the levelized cost of unit electricity and payback period are 0.144$/kWh and 7.07 years by coupling with low-temperature waste heat at 400 K.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信