{"title":"城市学校的植被复杂性和绿地多样性","authors":"A.R. Cunninghame, M.C. Stanley","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban greenspaces are critical for maintaining biodiversity and people’s connection to nature. Schools are distributed throughout cities and have the potential to provide for and enhance native biodiversity, while facilitating positive relationships between children and nature. However, very little is known about greenspaces on school grounds, particularly their ecological condition. We evaluated the size and quality of greenspaces in 64 urban primary schools in Auckland, Aotearoa–New Zealand by undertaking a rapid greenspace assessment to identify the relative proportions of greenspace types on school grounds, vegetation and habitat quality. All schools had trees present on their grounds, however only 36 % had a native forest patch, and habitat quality was generally low due to the dominance of sports fields, artificial turf and a lack of shrub layer. A larger number of different greenspace types on school grounds was associated with more large trees (>6 m), and a higher habitat quality score. A third of schools also had one or more environmental weed species present. The socio-economic status of schools did not appear to be a key factor in predicting the quality of a school’s greenspace. There are many opportunities to improve school greenspaces to better contribute to urban biodiversity as multifunctional spaces. Increasing greenspace type diversity, adding more vegetation layers, and increasing the diversity of native plant species on school grounds, would increase habitat complexity and improve biodiversity and cultural connection outcomes. The value of school grounds as multifunctional spaces will depend on place-specific ecological and cultural contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vegetation complexity and greenspace diversity in urban schools\",\"authors\":\"A.R. Cunninghame, M.C. Stanley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Urban greenspaces are critical for maintaining biodiversity and people’s connection to nature. Schools are distributed throughout cities and have the potential to provide for and enhance native biodiversity, while facilitating positive relationships between children and nature. However, very little is known about greenspaces on school grounds, particularly their ecological condition. We evaluated the size and quality of greenspaces in 64 urban primary schools in Auckland, Aotearoa–New Zealand by undertaking a rapid greenspace assessment to identify the relative proportions of greenspace types on school grounds, vegetation and habitat quality. All schools had trees present on their grounds, however only 36 % had a native forest patch, and habitat quality was generally low due to the dominance of sports fields, artificial turf and a lack of shrub layer. A larger number of different greenspace types on school grounds was associated with more large trees (>6 m), and a higher habitat quality score. A third of schools also had one or more environmental weed species present. The socio-economic status of schools did not appear to be a key factor in predicting the quality of a school’s greenspace. There are many opportunities to improve school greenspaces to better contribute to urban biodiversity as multifunctional spaces. Increasing greenspace type diversity, adding more vegetation layers, and increasing the diversity of native plant species on school grounds, would increase habitat complexity and improve biodiversity and cultural connection outcomes. The value of school grounds as multifunctional spaces will depend on place-specific ecological and cultural contexts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161886672400342X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161886672400342X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Vegetation complexity and greenspace diversity in urban schools
Urban greenspaces are critical for maintaining biodiversity and people’s connection to nature. Schools are distributed throughout cities and have the potential to provide for and enhance native biodiversity, while facilitating positive relationships between children and nature. However, very little is known about greenspaces on school grounds, particularly their ecological condition. We evaluated the size and quality of greenspaces in 64 urban primary schools in Auckland, Aotearoa–New Zealand by undertaking a rapid greenspace assessment to identify the relative proportions of greenspace types on school grounds, vegetation and habitat quality. All schools had trees present on their grounds, however only 36 % had a native forest patch, and habitat quality was generally low due to the dominance of sports fields, artificial turf and a lack of shrub layer. A larger number of different greenspace types on school grounds was associated with more large trees (>6 m), and a higher habitat quality score. A third of schools also had one or more environmental weed species present. The socio-economic status of schools did not appear to be a key factor in predicting the quality of a school’s greenspace. There are many opportunities to improve school greenspaces to better contribute to urban biodiversity as multifunctional spaces. Increasing greenspace type diversity, adding more vegetation layers, and increasing the diversity of native plant species on school grounds, would increase habitat complexity and improve biodiversity and cultural connection outcomes. The value of school grounds as multifunctional spaces will depend on place-specific ecological and cultural contexts.
期刊介绍:
Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries.
The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects:
-Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology.
-Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation.
-Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments.
-Management of urban forests and other vegetation.
Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.