出生体重对纵向行为结果的性别特异性影响:使用多基因评分的孟德尔随机化方法

IF 4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Lars Meinertz Byg , Carol Wang , John Attia , Andrew Whitehouse , Craig Pennell
{"title":"出生体重对纵向行为结果的性别特异性影响:使用多基因评分的孟德尔随机化方法","authors":"Lars Meinertz Byg ,&nbsp;Carol Wang ,&nbsp;John Attia ,&nbsp;Andrew Whitehouse ,&nbsp;Craig Pennell","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>It is unclear whether sex differences in behavior arising from birth weight (BW) are genuine because of the cross-sectional nature and potential confounding in previous studies. We aimed to test whether sex differences associated with BW phenotype were reproducible using a Mendelian randomization approach, i.e., association between polygenic score (PGS) for BW and behavior outcomes across childhood and adolescence.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using data from the Raine Study, we had 1484 genotyped participants with a total of 6446 Child Behavior Checklist assessments from ages 5 to 17 years. We used BW-PGSs in linear mixed-effect models to predict parentally assessed attention, aggression, and social problems scales; we also derived estimates and significance for a sex-by-genotype interaction. We used a Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold and tested robustness of the results with teacher assessments of behavior and a second PGS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We found a sex-by-genotype interaction with lower BW-PGSs associated with increased aggression in males compared with females. These findings were consistent across various analyses, including teacher assessments. Surprisingly, a lower BW-PGS showed protective effects in females, while a lower BW phenotype had detrimental effects in males with evidence of a genotype-phenotype mismatch increasing aggression problems in males only.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study underscores the genuine nature of behavioral sex differences arising from low BW and highlights the sex-dependent and diverging effects of environmental and genetic BW determinants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72373,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry global open science","volume":"4 6","pages":"Article 100387"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex-Specific Effects of Birth Weight on Longitudinal Behavioral Outcomes: A Mendelian Randomization Approach Using Polygenic Scores\",\"authors\":\"Lars Meinertz Byg ,&nbsp;Carol Wang ,&nbsp;John Attia ,&nbsp;Andrew Whitehouse ,&nbsp;Craig Pennell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>It is unclear whether sex differences in behavior arising from birth weight (BW) are genuine because of the cross-sectional nature and potential confounding in previous studies. We aimed to test whether sex differences associated with BW phenotype were reproducible using a Mendelian randomization approach, i.e., association between polygenic score (PGS) for BW and behavior outcomes across childhood and adolescence.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using data from the Raine Study, we had 1484 genotyped participants with a total of 6446 Child Behavior Checklist assessments from ages 5 to 17 years. We used BW-PGSs in linear mixed-effect models to predict parentally assessed attention, aggression, and social problems scales; we also derived estimates and significance for a sex-by-genotype interaction. We used a Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold and tested robustness of the results with teacher assessments of behavior and a second PGS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We found a sex-by-genotype interaction with lower BW-PGSs associated with increased aggression in males compared with females. These findings were consistent across various analyses, including teacher assessments. Surprisingly, a lower BW-PGS showed protective effects in females, while a lower BW phenotype had detrimental effects in males with evidence of a genotype-phenotype mismatch increasing aggression problems in males only.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study underscores the genuine nature of behavioral sex differences arising from low BW and highlights the sex-dependent and diverging effects of environmental and genetic BW determinants.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological psychiatry global open science\",\"volume\":\"4 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 100387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological psychiatry global open science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667174324001009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry global open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667174324001009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景由于以往研究的横断面性质和潜在混杂因素,出生体重(BW)引起的行为性别差异是否真实尚不清楚。我们的目的是采用孟德尔随机化方法检验与出生体重表型相关的性别差异是否具有可重复性,即出生体重的多基因评分(PGS)与儿童和青少年时期行为结果之间的关联。方法利用雷恩研究(Raine Study)的数据,我们对 1484 名参与者进行了基因分型,并对其 5 至 17 岁期间的 6446 项儿童行为检查表进行了评估。我们在线性混合效应模型中使用 BW-PGS 来预测父母评估的注意力、攻击性和社会问题量表;我们还得出了性别-基因型交互作用的估计值和显著性。我们使用了 Bonferroni 校正的显著性阈值,并通过教师对行为的评估和第二个 PGS 检验了结果的稳健性。结果我们发现了性别-基因型交互作用,与女性相比,较低的 BW-PGS 与男性的攻击性增加有关。这些结果在包括教师评估在内的各种分析中都是一致的。令人惊讶的是,较低的体重-PGS 对女性有保护作用,而较低的体重表型则对男性有不利影响,有证据表明基因型-表型不匹配只会增加男性的攻击性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex-Specific Effects of Birth Weight on Longitudinal Behavioral Outcomes: A Mendelian Randomization Approach Using Polygenic Scores

Background

It is unclear whether sex differences in behavior arising from birth weight (BW) are genuine because of the cross-sectional nature and potential confounding in previous studies. We aimed to test whether sex differences associated with BW phenotype were reproducible using a Mendelian randomization approach, i.e., association between polygenic score (PGS) for BW and behavior outcomes across childhood and adolescence.

Methods

Using data from the Raine Study, we had 1484 genotyped participants with a total of 6446 Child Behavior Checklist assessments from ages 5 to 17 years. We used BW-PGSs in linear mixed-effect models to predict parentally assessed attention, aggression, and social problems scales; we also derived estimates and significance for a sex-by-genotype interaction. We used a Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold and tested robustness of the results with teacher assessments of behavior and a second PGS.

Results

We found a sex-by-genotype interaction with lower BW-PGSs associated with increased aggression in males compared with females. These findings were consistent across various analyses, including teacher assessments. Surprisingly, a lower BW-PGS showed protective effects in females, while a lower BW phenotype had detrimental effects in males with evidence of a genotype-phenotype mismatch increasing aggression problems in males only.

Conclusions

This study underscores the genuine nature of behavioral sex differences arising from low BW and highlights the sex-dependent and diverging effects of environmental and genetic BW determinants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological psychiatry global open science
Biological psychiatry global open science Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
91 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信