环戊二烯羰基钌的双核甲基膦配合物:钌衍生物相对于铁衍生物的较高配体场强的影响

IF 3.5 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR
Oleg Rudenco, Alexandru Lupan, Radu Silaghi-Dumitrescu and R. Bruce King
{"title":"环戊二烯羰基钌的双核甲基膦配合物:钌衍生物相对于铁衍生物的较高配体场强的影响","authors":"Oleg Rudenco, Alexandru Lupan, Radu Silaghi-Dumitrescu and R. Bruce King","doi":"10.1039/D4DT02279C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The structures and energetics of the binuclear methylphosphinidene complexes of cyclopentadienylruthenium carbonyls of the type [MePRu<small><sub>2</sub></small>(CO)<small><sub><em>n</em></sub></small>Cp<small><sub>2</sub></small>] (<em>n</em> = 4, 3, 2, 1) have been investigated for comparison with their previously studied iron analogues. For the tetracarbonyls and tricarbonyls [MePM<small><sub>2</sub></small>(CO)<small><sub><em>n</em></sub></small>Cp<small><sub>2</sub></small>] (<em>n</em> = 4, 3) substituting ruthenium for iron has relatively little effect on the energetically preferred structures. Thus such structures have two-electron donor bridging MeP groups with no metal–metal bond for the tetracarbonyls and a metal–metal single bond for the tricarbonyls. This leads to favored 18-electron configurations for both ruthenium atoms in all cases. However, the higher ligand field strengths of ruthenium complexes relative to analogous iron complexes have major effects on the energetically preferred structures for the dicarbonyls and monocarbonyls [MePM<small><sub>2</sub></small>(CO)<small><sub><em>n</em></sub></small>Cp<small><sub>2</sub></small>] (M = Fe, Ru; <em>n</em> = 2, 1). Thus the 11 lowest energy structures for the dicarbonyl [MePFe<small><sub>2</sub></small>(CO)<small><sub>2</sub></small>Cp<small><sub>2</sub></small>] are triplet or quintet spin state structures whereas the 6 lowest energy structures for the ruthenium analogue [MePRu<small><sub>2</sub></small>(CO)<small><sub>2</sub></small>Cp<small><sub>2</sub></small>] are all singlet structures. These low-energy singlet [MePRu<small><sub>2</sub></small>(CO)<small><sub>2</sub></small>Cp<small><sub>2</sub></small>] structures include species in which both ruthenium atoms attain the favored 18-electron configurations in different ways: either by a Ru–Ru single bond and an agostic C–H–Ru interaction from the methyl group, a Ru–Ru single bond and a four-electron donor bridging MeP ligand with P<img>Ru double bonds, or a formal Ru<img>Ru double bond with a two-electron donor bridging MeP ligand. The 8 lowest energy structures for the diiron monocarbonyl [MePFe<small><sub>2</sub></small>(CO)Cp<small><sub>2</sub></small>] are all triplet or quintet spin structures whereas the lowest energy structure for the diruthenium monocarbonyl [MePRu<small><sub>2</sub></small>(CO)Cp<small><sub>2</sub></small>] by more than 20 kcal mol<small><sup>−1</sup></small> is a singlet structure with a formal Ru<img>Ru double bond and bridging CO and four-electron donor MeP groups. Thermochemical information predicts such monocarbonyl derivatives to be the dominant binuclear decarbonylation products of the tricarbonyls [RPRu<small><sub>2</sub></small>(CO)<small><sub>3</sub></small>Cp<small><sub>2</sub></small>] by thermal or photochemical methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":71,"journal":{"name":"Dalton Transactions","volume":" 43","pages":" 17654-17663"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/dt/d4dt02279c?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Binuclear methylphosphinidine complexes of cyclopentadienylruthenium carbonyls: effects of the higher ligand field strength of ruthenium derivatives relative to iron derivatives†\",\"authors\":\"Oleg Rudenco, Alexandru Lupan, Radu Silaghi-Dumitrescu and R. Bruce King\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4DT02279C\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The structures and energetics of the binuclear methylphosphinidene complexes of cyclopentadienylruthenium carbonyls of the type [MePRu<small><sub>2</sub></small>(CO)<small><sub><em>n</em></sub></small>Cp<small><sub>2</sub></small>] (<em>n</em> = 4, 3, 2, 1) have been investigated for comparison with their previously studied iron analogues. For the tetracarbonyls and tricarbonyls [MePM<small><sub>2</sub></small>(CO)<small><sub><em>n</em></sub></small>Cp<small><sub>2</sub></small>] (<em>n</em> = 4, 3) substituting ruthenium for iron has relatively little effect on the energetically preferred structures. Thus such structures have two-electron donor bridging MeP groups with no metal–metal bond for the tetracarbonyls and a metal–metal single bond for the tricarbonyls. This leads to favored 18-electron configurations for both ruthenium atoms in all cases. However, the higher ligand field strengths of ruthenium complexes relative to analogous iron complexes have major effects on the energetically preferred structures for the dicarbonyls and monocarbonyls [MePM<small><sub>2</sub></small>(CO)<small><sub><em>n</em></sub></small>Cp<small><sub>2</sub></small>] (M = Fe, Ru; <em>n</em> = 2, 1). Thus the 11 lowest energy structures for the dicarbonyl [MePFe<small><sub>2</sub></small>(CO)<small><sub>2</sub></small>Cp<small><sub>2</sub></small>] are triplet or quintet spin state structures whereas the 6 lowest energy structures for the ruthenium analogue [MePRu<small><sub>2</sub></small>(CO)<small><sub>2</sub></small>Cp<small><sub>2</sub></small>] are all singlet structures. These low-energy singlet [MePRu<small><sub>2</sub></small>(CO)<small><sub>2</sub></small>Cp<small><sub>2</sub></small>] structures include species in which both ruthenium atoms attain the favored 18-electron configurations in different ways: either by a Ru–Ru single bond and an agostic C–H–Ru interaction from the methyl group, a Ru–Ru single bond and a four-electron donor bridging MeP ligand with P<img>Ru double bonds, or a formal Ru<img>Ru double bond with a two-electron donor bridging MeP ligand. The 8 lowest energy structures for the diiron monocarbonyl [MePFe<small><sub>2</sub></small>(CO)Cp<small><sub>2</sub></small>] are all triplet or quintet spin structures whereas the lowest energy structure for the diruthenium monocarbonyl [MePRu<small><sub>2</sub></small>(CO)Cp<small><sub>2</sub></small>] by more than 20 kcal mol<small><sup>−1</sup></small> is a singlet structure with a formal Ru<img>Ru double bond and bridging CO and four-electron donor MeP groups. Thermochemical information predicts such monocarbonyl derivatives to be the dominant binuclear decarbonylation products of the tricarbonyls [RPRu<small><sub>2</sub></small>(CO)<small><sub>3</sub></small>Cp<small><sub>2</sub></small>] by thermal or photochemical methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":71,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dalton Transactions\",\"volume\":\" 43\",\"pages\":\" 17654-17663\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/dt/d4dt02279c?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dalton Transactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/dt/d4dt02279c\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dalton Transactions","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/dt/d4dt02279c","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了 MePRu2(CO)nCp2(n = 4、3、2、1)型环戊二烯钌羰基双核甲基亚膦配合物的结构和能量,并将其与之前研究过的铁类似物进行了比较。对于四羰基和三羰基 MePM2(CO)nCp2(n = 4、3),用钌代替铁对能量优选结构的影响相对较小。因此,这种结构具有两个电子供体桥接 MeP 基团,四羰基没有金属-金属键,三羰基有金属-金属单键。这就导致在所有情况下,两个钌原子都倾向于 18 电子构型。然而,与类似的铁络合物相比,钌络合物的配体场强更高,这对二羰基和单羰基 MePM2(CO)nCp2 (M = Fe、Ru;n = 2、1)的优先能量结构产生了重大影响。因此,二羰基 MePFe2(CO)2Cp2 的 11 种最低能量结构都是三重或五重自旋态结构,而钌类似物 MePRu2(CO)2Cp2 的 6 种最低能量结构都是单重结构。这些低能单质 MePRu2(CO)2Cp2 结构包括两个钌原子以不同方式获得有利的 18 电子构型的物种:通过 Ru-Ru 单键和来自甲基的不稳定 C-H-Ru 相互作用、Ru-Ru 单键和带有 P=Ru 双键的四电子供体桥接 MeP 配体,或正式的 Ru=Ru 双键和双电子供体桥接 MeP 配体。二铁单羰基 MePFe2(CO)Cp2 的 8 个最低能量结构都是三重或五重自旋结构,而二钌单羰基 MePRu2(CO)Cp2 的最低能量结构则超过 20 kcal/mol,是一个具有形式 Ru=Ru 双键、桥接 CO 和四电子供体 MeP 基团的单重结构。热化学信息预测,通过热或光化学方法,这种单羰基衍生物将成为三羰基 RPRu2(CO)3Cp2 的主要双核脱羰基产物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Binuclear methylphosphinidine complexes of cyclopentadienylruthenium carbonyls: effects of the higher ligand field strength of ruthenium derivatives relative to iron derivatives†

Binuclear methylphosphinidine complexes of cyclopentadienylruthenium carbonyls: effects of the higher ligand field strength of ruthenium derivatives relative to iron derivatives†

The structures and energetics of the binuclear methylphosphinidene complexes of cyclopentadienylruthenium carbonyls of the type [MePRu2(CO)nCp2] (n = 4, 3, 2, 1) have been investigated for comparison with their previously studied iron analogues. For the tetracarbonyls and tricarbonyls [MePM2(CO)nCp2] (n = 4, 3) substituting ruthenium for iron has relatively little effect on the energetically preferred structures. Thus such structures have two-electron donor bridging MeP groups with no metal–metal bond for the tetracarbonyls and a metal–metal single bond for the tricarbonyls. This leads to favored 18-electron configurations for both ruthenium atoms in all cases. However, the higher ligand field strengths of ruthenium complexes relative to analogous iron complexes have major effects on the energetically preferred structures for the dicarbonyls and monocarbonyls [MePM2(CO)nCp2] (M = Fe, Ru; n = 2, 1). Thus the 11 lowest energy structures for the dicarbonyl [MePFe2(CO)2Cp2] are triplet or quintet spin state structures whereas the 6 lowest energy structures for the ruthenium analogue [MePRu2(CO)2Cp2] are all singlet structures. These low-energy singlet [MePRu2(CO)2Cp2] structures include species in which both ruthenium atoms attain the favored 18-electron configurations in different ways: either by a Ru–Ru single bond and an agostic C–H–Ru interaction from the methyl group, a Ru–Ru single bond and a four-electron donor bridging MeP ligand with PRu double bonds, or a formal RuRu double bond with a two-electron donor bridging MeP ligand. The 8 lowest energy structures for the diiron monocarbonyl [MePFe2(CO)Cp2] are all triplet or quintet spin structures whereas the lowest energy structure for the diruthenium monocarbonyl [MePRu2(CO)Cp2] by more than 20 kcal mol−1 is a singlet structure with a formal RuRu double bond and bridging CO and four-electron donor MeP groups. Thermochemical information predicts such monocarbonyl derivatives to be the dominant binuclear decarbonylation products of the tricarbonyls [RPRu2(CO)3Cp2] by thermal or photochemical methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dalton Transactions
Dalton Transactions 化学-无机化学与核化学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1832
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Dalton Transactions is a journal for all areas of inorganic chemistry, which encompasses the organometallic, bioinorganic and materials chemistry of the elements, with applications including synthesis, catalysis, energy conversion/storage, electrical devices and medicine. Dalton Transactions welcomes high-quality, original submissions in all of these areas and more, where the advancement of knowledge in inorganic chemistry is significant.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信