Joseph Brealey, Rebecca Lees, Robert Tempest, Alice Law, Sonia Guarnerio, Rawan Maani, Soozana Puvanenthiran, Nick Peake, Ryan Pink, Ben Peacock
{"title":"荧光 EV 染料:通过纳米流式细胞仪评估功效、特异性和适用性","authors":"Joseph Brealey, Rebecca Lees, Robert Tempest, Alice Law, Sonia Guarnerio, Rawan Maani, Soozana Puvanenthiran, Nick Peake, Ryan Pink, Ben Peacock","doi":"10.1002/jex2.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are mediators of intercellular communication, recently recognised for their clinical applications. Accurate characterisation and quantification of EVs are critical for understanding of their function and clinical relevance. Many platforms utilise fluorescence for EV characterisation, frequently labelling surface proteins to identify EVs. The heterogeneity of EVs and the lack of a universal protein marker encourages the use of generic EV labelling methods, including membrane labelling. Using nano-flow cytometry, we evaluated six membrane dyes, including MemGlow and CellMask. Evaluation criteria included EV labelling efficacy, non-specific labelling of very low-density lipoproteins (VLDLs), brightness and dye aggregation. Significant variation was observed in dye performance, with certain dyes showing poor EV labelling efficacy or high affinity to VLDLs. Importantly, several promising candidates were identified for further investigation. Overall, this study highlights the importance of selecting appropriate membrane dyes for EV staining tailored to the aims of the study and the EV origin. MemGlow and CellMask proved favourable, allowing bright, sensitive staining of EV membranes with minimal aggregation. However, MemGlow showed an affinity to VLDLs, and CellMask requires additional sample handling for optimal labelling. These results contribute to deepening our understanding of EV membrane dyes, allowing for better dye selection and EV identification in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of extracellular biology","volume":"3 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jex2.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shining a light on fluorescent EV dyes: Evaluating efficacy, specificity and suitability by nano-flow cytometry\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Brealey, Rebecca Lees, Robert Tempest, Alice Law, Sonia Guarnerio, Rawan Maani, Soozana Puvanenthiran, Nick Peake, Ryan Pink, Ben Peacock\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jex2.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are mediators of intercellular communication, recently recognised for their clinical applications. Accurate characterisation and quantification of EVs are critical for understanding of their function and clinical relevance. Many platforms utilise fluorescence for EV characterisation, frequently labelling surface proteins to identify EVs. The heterogeneity of EVs and the lack of a universal protein marker encourages the use of generic EV labelling methods, including membrane labelling. Using nano-flow cytometry, we evaluated six membrane dyes, including MemGlow and CellMask. Evaluation criteria included EV labelling efficacy, non-specific labelling of very low-density lipoproteins (VLDLs), brightness and dye aggregation. Significant variation was observed in dye performance, with certain dyes showing poor EV labelling efficacy or high affinity to VLDLs. Importantly, several promising candidates were identified for further investigation. Overall, this study highlights the importance of selecting appropriate membrane dyes for EV staining tailored to the aims of the study and the EV origin. MemGlow and CellMask proved favourable, allowing bright, sensitive staining of EV membranes with minimal aggregation. However, MemGlow showed an affinity to VLDLs, and CellMask requires additional sample handling for optimal labelling. These results contribute to deepening our understanding of EV membrane dyes, allowing for better dye selection and EV identification in future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of extracellular biology\",\"volume\":\"3 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jex2.70006\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of extracellular biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jex2.70006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of extracellular biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jex2.70006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
细胞外囊泡(EVs)是细胞间通信的介质,其临床应用最近得到了认可。准确表征和量化 EVs 对了解其功能和临床意义至关重要。许多平台利用荧光技术对 EV 进行表征,经常标记表面蛋白来识别 EV。EVs 的异质性和通用蛋白标记的缺乏促使人们使用通用的 EV 标记方法,包括膜标记。利用纳米流式细胞仪,我们评估了六种膜染料,包括 MemGlow 和 CellMask。评估标准包括 EV 标记效果、极低密度脂蛋白 (VLDL) 的非特异性标记、亮度和染料聚集。在染料性能方面观察到了明显的差异,某些染料对 EV 的标记效果较差,或对 VLDLs 的亲和力较高。重要的是,确定了几种有希望的候选染料,以供进一步研究。总之,这项研究强调了根据研究目的和 EV 来源选择合适的 EV 染色膜染料的重要性。事实证明,MemGlow 和 CellMask 染色效果较好,能对 EV 膜进行明亮、灵敏的染色,且聚集现象极少。不过,MemGlow 对 VLDLs 有亲和力,而 CellMask 则需要额外的样品处理才能达到最佳标记效果。这些结果有助于加深我们对 EV 膜染料的理解,从而在未来的研究中更好地选择染料和鉴定 EV。
Shining a light on fluorescent EV dyes: Evaluating efficacy, specificity and suitability by nano-flow cytometry
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are mediators of intercellular communication, recently recognised for their clinical applications. Accurate characterisation and quantification of EVs are critical for understanding of their function and clinical relevance. Many platforms utilise fluorescence for EV characterisation, frequently labelling surface proteins to identify EVs. The heterogeneity of EVs and the lack of a universal protein marker encourages the use of generic EV labelling methods, including membrane labelling. Using nano-flow cytometry, we evaluated six membrane dyes, including MemGlow and CellMask. Evaluation criteria included EV labelling efficacy, non-specific labelling of very low-density lipoproteins (VLDLs), brightness and dye aggregation. Significant variation was observed in dye performance, with certain dyes showing poor EV labelling efficacy or high affinity to VLDLs. Importantly, several promising candidates were identified for further investigation. Overall, this study highlights the importance of selecting appropriate membrane dyes for EV staining tailored to the aims of the study and the EV origin. MemGlow and CellMask proved favourable, allowing bright, sensitive staining of EV membranes with minimal aggregation. However, MemGlow showed an affinity to VLDLs, and CellMask requires additional sample handling for optimal labelling. These results contribute to deepening our understanding of EV membrane dyes, allowing for better dye selection and EV identification in future studies.