Erratum to “Localization of peripheral reactions and sensitivity to the imaginary potential” [Nucl. Phys. A 1006 (2021) 122109]

We have found a typo mistake in the code used to obtain the double folding results discussed in the above paper. However the single folding results were unaffected as they were calculated with a different code.

The correct code provides values bringing the double folding and the single folding results closer to each other at an incident energy around 60 A.MeV, as it can be seen in Table 1 and Figs. 1 and 2 presented in the following. However the main conclusions of the paper are qualitatively unaffected because the single folding model still provides larger reaction cross sections and strong absorption radii indicating the important effect of surface absorption. This is particularly true in the high energy case for which there are also data shown in the four panels of Fig. 3 where the energy dependence of the reaction cross section for four different projectiles is studied comparing data with the single folding and double folding results. There are only a few small projectile cases shown in Table 1 for which the single folding provides smaller cross sections and strong absorption radii than the double folding.